Socratic Pedagogy: Perplexity, humiliation, shame and a broken egg

被引:17
作者
Boghossian, Peter [1 ]
机构
[1] Portland State Univ, Dept Philosophy, Portland, OR 97207 USA
关键词
Socratic method; Socratic pedagogy; perplexity; humiliation; shame; confusion; MORAL DISENGAGEMENT; GUILT; EXERCISE; AGENCY;
D O I
10.1111/j.1469-5812.2011.00773.x
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
This article addresses and rebuts the claim that the purpose of the Socratic method is to humiliate, shame, and perplex participants. It clarifies pedagogical and exegetical confusions surrounding the Socratic method, what the Socratic method is, what its epistemological ambitions are, and how the historical Socrates likely viewed it. First, this article explains the Socratic method; second, it clarifies a misunderstanding regarding Socrates' role in intentionally perplexing his interlocutors; third, it discusses two different types of perplexity and relates these to philosophical inquiry and dialectical pedagogy; finally, it refutes the claim that those who use the Socratic method intentionally attempt to shame and humiliate students.
引用
收藏
页码:710 / 720
页数:11
相关论文
共 48 条
[1]  
ABBS P, 1994, ED IMPERATIVE DEFENS
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1995, SELF CONSCIOUS EMOTI
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1999, NEB. L. REV.
[4]   MORALISM AND CRUELTY - REFLECTIONS ON HUME AND KANT [J].
BAIER, AC .
ETHICS, 1993, 103 (03) :436-457
[5]  
Baier AnnetteC., 1994, Moral Prejudices: Essays on Ethics
[6]   Mechanisms of moral disengagement in the exercise of moral agency [J].
Bandura, A ;
Barbaranelli, C ;
Caprara, GV .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1996, 71 (02) :364-374
[7]  
Bandura A, 1999, Pers Soc Psychol Rev, V3, P193, DOI 10.1207/s15327957pspr0303_3
[8]   Selective moral disengagement in the exercise of moral agency [J].
Bandura, A .
JOURNAL OF MORAL EDUCATION, 2002, 31 (02) :101-119
[9]  
Bandura Albert., 1990, Origins of Terrorism, P161
[10]  
Benson HughH., 1990, OXFORD STUDIES ANCIE, V8, P19