Observing regional divergence of Chinese nanotechnology centers

被引:13
作者
Motoyama, Yasuyuki [1 ]
Cao, Cong [2 ]
Appelbaum, Richard [3 ]
机构
[1] Ewing Marion Kauffman Fdn, Kansas City, MO 64110 USA
[2] Univ Nottingham, Sch Contemporary Chinese Studies, Nottingham NG8 1BB, England
[3] Univ Calif Santa Barbara, Ctr Nanotechnol Soc, Santa Barbara, CA 93160 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
China; Nanotechnology; Patents; Spatial analysis; RESEARCH-AND-DEVELOPMENT; UNIVERSITY-RESEARCH; UNITED-STATES; INNOVATION; SPILLOVERS; PROXIMITY; PATENTS; CONVERGENCE; CITATIONS; GEOGRAPHY;
D O I
10.1016/j.techfore.2013.02.013
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
While China has emerged as one of the world's leading technological innovators, past studies have uncovered that technology centers have been overwhelmingly concentrated in Beijing and Shanghai. We take a step further to investigate whether this geographic concentration has persisted over time with nanotechnology-related patents. We apply the spatial analysis techniques and employ Gini's coefficient and global Moran's I. We additionally test the spatial patterns at four scales: the municipality, the county, the intra-metropolitan, and the distance-based. We find that while Beijing and Shanghai have remained the two dominant nanotechnology clusters, the Shanghai region, together with Jiangsu and Zhejiang, surpassed the traditionally productive Beijing-Tianjin region by 2007. We did not identify spatial autocorrelation at the province level, but at the county level, and at the scale between 20 km and 75 km. The intra-metropolitan analysis in Beijing and Shanghai further confirmed that the geographic concentration of nanotechnology is small, around 20 km. These results support the regional divergence theory and a small scale of technology diffusion, as well as the possibility of continually increasing inequality in China and its technology development. (C) 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:11 / 21
页数:11
相关论文
共 55 条
[1]  
Acs Z., 1989, KYKLOS, V42
[2]  
Acs Z., 1996, EVOLUTIONARY EC NEW, P183
[3]  
Acs Z.J., 1994, Managerial and Decision Economics, V15, P131, DOI [10.1002/mde.4090150205, DOI 10.1002/MDE.4090150205]
[4]   Patents and innovation counts as measures of regional production of new knowledge [J].
Acs, ZJ ;
Anselin, L ;
Varga, A .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2002, 31 (07) :1069-1085
[5]  
ALDSTADT J., 2010, Handbook of Applied Spatial Analysis, P279, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-03647-7_15
[6]  
[Anonymous], SCI PUBLIC POLICY, DOI [10.3152/030234208x319366, DOI 10.3152/030234208X319366]
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2010, Science and Engineering Indicators, VNSB 10-01
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2011, NY TIMES
[9]  
[Anonymous], 2008, NAT NANOTECHNOL, V3, P309
[10]  
[Anonymous], 1993, The East Asian Miracle: Economic Growth and Public Policy