Salinity and drought interaction in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) is affected by the genotype and plant growth stage

被引:35
作者
Saqib, Muhammad [1 ]
Akhtar, Javaid [1 ]
Abbas, Ghulam [1 ]
Nasim, Muhammad [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Agr Faisalabad, Inst Soil & Environm Sci, Faisalabad, Pakistan
[2] Soil & Water Testing Lab, Behawalpur, Pakistan
关键词
Drought; Growth stage; Photosynthesis; Salinity; Water relations; Wheat; WATER-USE EFFICIENCY; SALT-RESISTANCE; STRESS; TOLERANCE; YIELD; CULTIVARS; ROOTS; SOILS;
D O I
10.1007/s11738-013-1308-8
中图分类号
Q94 [植物学];
学科分类号
071001 ;
摘要
Salinity and drought are important agro-environmental problems occurring separately as well as together with the combined occurrence increasing with time due to climate change. Screening of bread wheat genotypes against salinity or drought alone is common; however, little information is available on the response of wheat genotypes to a combination of these stresses. This study investigates the response of a salt-resistant (SARC-1) and a salt-sensitive (7-Cerros) wheat genotype to drought at different growth stages under non-saline (ECe 2.1 dS m(-1)) and saline soil (ECe 15 dS m(-1)) conditions. Drought was applied by withholding water for 21 days at a particular growth stage viz. tillering, booting, and grain filling stages. At booting stage measurements regarding water relations, leaf ionic composition and photosynthetic attributes were made. At maturity grain yield and different yield, components were recorded. Salinity and drought significantly decreased grain yield and different yield components with a higher decrease in the case of combined stress of salinity x drought. The complete drought treatment (drought at tillering + booting + grain filling stages) was most harmful for wheat followed by drought at booting stage and grain filling-tillering stages, respectively. The salt-resistant wheat genotype SARC-1 performed better than the salt-sensitive genotype 7-Cerros in different stress treatments. A decrease in the water and turgor potentials, photosynthetic and transpiration rates, stomatal conductance, leaf K+, and increased leaf Na+ were the apparent causes of growth and yield reduction of bread wheat due to salinity, drought, and salinity x drought.
引用
收藏
页码:2761 / 2768
页数:8
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]  
Ayers R, 1985, 29 FAO
[2]   APPROACHES TO IMPROVE STRESS TOLERANCE USING MOLECULAR-GENETICS [J].
BARTELS, D ;
NELSON, D .
PLANT CELL AND ENVIRONMENT, 1994, 17 (05) :659-667
[3]   Salt resistance is determined by osmotic adjustment and abscisic acid in newly developed maize hybrids in the first phase of salt stress [J].
De Costa, Weerathunga ;
Zoerb, Christian ;
Hartung, Wolfram ;
Schubert, Sven .
PHYSIOLOGIA PLANTARUM, 2007, 131 (02) :311-321
[4]  
Fageria N.K., 1991, Growth and Mineral Nutrition of Field Crops
[5]  
FAO, 2005, GLOB NETW INT SOIL M
[6]   Membrane permeability and micro- and macroelement accumulation in spring wheat cultivars during the short-term effect of salinity- and PEG-induced water stress [J].
Filek, Maria ;
Walas, Stanislaw ;
Mrowiec, Halina ;
Rudolphy-Skorska, Elzbieta ;
Sieprawska, Apolonia ;
Biesaga-Koscielniak, Jolanta .
ACTA PHYSIOLOGIAE PLANTARUM, 2012, 34 (03) :985-995
[7]   Diffusive and metabolic limitations to photosynthesis under drought and salinity in C3 plants [J].
Flexas, J ;
Bota, J ;
Loreto, F ;
Cornic, G ;
Sharkey, TD .
PLANT BIOLOGY, 2004, 6 (03) :269-279
[8]   Effect of water stress on physiological attributes and their relationship with growth and yield of wheat cultivars at different stages [J].
Gupta, NK ;
Gupta, S ;
Kumar, A .
JOURNAL OF AGRONOMY AND CROP SCIENCE-ZEITSCHRIFT FUR ACKER UND PFLANZENBAU, 2001, 186 (01) :55-62
[9]   AGRONOMIC PERFORMANCE OF WHEAT (TRITICUM-AESTIVUM L) AS INFLUENCED BY MOISTURE STRESS AT VARIOUS GROWTH-STAGES AND SEEDING RATE [J].
HASSAN, UA ;
OGUNLELA, VB ;
SINHA, TD .
JOURNAL OF AGRONOMY AND CROP SCIENCE-ZEITSCHRIFT FUR ACKER UND PFLANZENBAU, 1987, 158 (03) :172-180
[10]   Drought and salinity: A comparison of their effects on mineral nutrition of plants [J].
Hu, YC ;
Schmidhalter, U .
JOURNAL OF PLANT NUTRITION AND SOIL SCIENCE, 2005, 168 (04) :541-549