EMBRYO DONATION IN IRAN: AN ETHICAL REVIEW

被引:11
|
作者
Afshar, Leila [1 ]
Bagheri, Alireza [2 ]
机构
[1] Shiraz Univ Med Sci, Shiraz, Iran
[2] Univ Tehran Med Sci, Ctr Med Eth, Tehran 1468715463, Iran
关键词
embryo donation; ARTs; Islamic bioethics; Iran; DISCLOSURE;
D O I
10.1111/j.1471-8847.2012.00334.x
中图分类号
B82 [伦理学(道德学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Iran is the only Muslim country that has legislation on embryo donation, adopted in 2003. With an estimated 10-15% of couples in the country that are infertile, there are not any legal or religious barriers that prohibit an infertile couple from taking advantage of Assisted Reproductive Technologies (ARTs). Although all forms of ARTs available in Iran have been legitimized by religious authorities, there is a lack of legislation in all ARTs except embryo donation. By highlighting ethical issues in embryo donation, the paper presents a critical review of the Act of Embryo Donation in Iran. The paper argues that the Act does not provide enough safeguards for the future child and assurance for the safety of the donated embryos. It also does not restrict embryo donation to surplus embryos from infertile couples and is silent about the number of embryos that could be donated by each couple as well as the number of recipients for donated embryos by a couple. The Act is also silent about the issues of genetic linkage (nasab) and heritage which are challenging issues, especially in a conservative Islamic society. As a result, the future child may not inherit from their birth parents, as it is not required by the Act, or from the genetically related parents under the anonymity policy. Finally there is no standard national protocol or guidelines to evaluate the safety of the donated embryos. The paper concludes that despite its benefits, the Act lacks clarity, and it is subject to misunderstanding and confusion.
引用
收藏
页码:119 / 124
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Embryo donation:: outcome and attitudes among embryo donors and recipients
    Söderström-Anttila, V
    Foudila, T
    Ripatti, UR
    Siegberg, R
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2001, 16 (06) : 1120 - 1128
  • [22] Defining embryo donation: a committee opinion
    Amato, Paula
    Brzyski, Robert
    Braverman, Andrea
    Benward, Jean
    Stein, Andrea
    Steinbock, Bonnie
    Wilder, Bruce
    Reindollar, Richard
    Lamb, Dolores
    Robertson, John
    Daar, Judith
    Francis, Leslie
    Gibson, Mark
    Rebar, Robert
    Tipton, Sean
    Fisseha, Senait
    Ralston, Steven
    Spillman, Monique
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2013, 99 (07) : 1846 - 1847
  • [23] Egg and embryo donation and the meaning of motherhood
    Kirkman, M
    WOMEN & HEALTH, 2003, 38 (02) : 1 - 18
  • [24] What do parents say to their children when they have been conceived by embryo donation or double donation treatment?
    Doherty, N.
    MacCallum, F.
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2015, 30 : 342 - 343
  • [25] THE CONTRIBUTIONS OF EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE TO SOCIO-ETHICAL DEBATES ON FRESH EMBRYO DONATION FOR HUMAN EMBRYONIC STEM CELL RESEARCH
    Haimes, Erica
    Taylor, Ken
    BIOETHICS, 2011, 25 (06) : 334 - 341
  • [26] The increasing trend of blood donation in Iran
    Soodejani, Moslem Taheri
    Haghdoost, Ali Akbar
    Sedaghat, Abbas
    Baneshi, Mohammad Reza
    Zolala, Farzaneh
    BLOOD RESEARCH, 2019, 54 (04) : 269 - 273
  • [27] Attitudes towards embryo donation in Swedish women and men of reproductive age
    Wanggren, Kjell
    Prag, Frida
    Svanberg, Agneta Skoog
    UPSALA JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2013, 118 (03) : 187 - 195
  • [28] Attitudes toward embryo donation among staff at in vitro fertilization clinics
    Wanggren, Kjell
    Baban, Mario
    Svanberg, Agneta Skoog
    ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2014, 93 (08) : 765 - 770
  • [29] Embryo Donation or Embryo Adoption? Practice and Policy in the New Zealand Context
    Goedeke, Sonja
    Daniels, Ken R.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LAW POLICY AND THE FAMILY, 2017, 31 (01) : 1 - 19
  • [30] They Can't Have My Embryo: The Ethics of Conditional Embryo Donation
    Frith, Lucy
    Blyth, Eric
    BIOETHICS, 2013, 27 (06) : 317 - 324