Reliability of a smartphone-based goniometer for knee joint goniometry

被引:85
作者
Ferriero, Giorgio [1 ]
Vercelli, Stefano [1 ]
Sartorio, Francesco [1 ]
Munoz Lasa, Susana [4 ]
Ilieva, Elena [5 ]
Brigatti, Elisa [2 ]
Ruella, Carolina
Foti, Calogero [3 ]
机构
[1] Salvatore Maugeri Fdn, IRCCS, Sci Inst Veruno, Unit Occupat Rehabil & Ergon, I-28010 Veruno, Italy
[2] Salvatore Maugeri Fdn, IRCCS, Dept Neurorehabil, Sci Inst Tradate, Tradate, Italy
[3] Univ Roma Tor Vergata, Dept Phys & Rehabil Med, Rome, Italy
[4] Univ Complutense, Dept Phys Med & Rehabil, E-28040 Madrid, Spain
[5] Plovdiv Med Univ, St George Med Univ Hosp, Dept Phys Med & Rehabil, Plovdiv, Bulgaria
关键词
knee; mHealth; mobile phone; range of motion; reliability; smartphone; tests and measurements; validation; MOTION; RANGE; PHOTOGRAPHY; ELBOW;
D O I
10.1097/MRR.0b013e32835b8269
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
The aim of this study was to assess the reliability of a smartphone-based application developed for photographic-based goniometry, DrGoniometer (DrG), by comparing its measurement of the knee joint angle with that made by a universal goniometer (UG). Joint goniometry is a common mode of clinical assessment used in many disciplines, in particular in rehabilitation. One validated method is photographic-based goniometry, but the procedure is usually complex: the image has to be downloaded from the camera to a computer and then edited using dedicated software. This disadvantage may be overcome by the new generation of mobile phones (smartphones) that have computer-like functionality and an integrated digital camera. This validation study was carried out under two different controlled conditions: (i) with the participant to measure in a fixed position and (ii) with a battery of pictures to assess. In the first part, four raters performed repeated measurements with DrG and UG at different knee joint angles. Then, 10 other raters measured the knee at different flexion angles ranging 20-145 degrees on a battery of 35 pictures taken in a clinical setting. The results showed that inter-rater and intra-rater correlations were always more than 0.958. Agreement with the UG showed a width of 18.2 degrees [95% limits of agreement (LoA)= -7.5/ + 10.7 degrees] and 14.1 degrees (LoA = -6.6/ + 7.5 degrees). In conclusion, DrG seems to be a reliable method for measuring knee joint angle. This mHealth application can be an alternative/additional method of goniometry, easier to use than other photographic-based goniometric assessments. Further studies are required to assess its reliability for the measurement of other joints.
引用
收藏
页码:146 / 151
页数:6
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]   Measurement of knee joint motion using digital imaging [J].
Bennett, Damien ;
Hanratty, Brian ;
Thompson, Neville ;
Beverland, David .
INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS, 2009, 33 (06) :1627-1631
[2]   STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT [J].
BLAND, JM ;
ALTMAN, DG .
LANCET, 1986, 1 (8476) :307-310
[3]   Validation of a photography-based goniometry method for measuring joint range of motion [J].
Blonna, Davide ;
Zarkadas, Peter C. ;
Fitzsimmons, James S. ;
O'Driscoll, Shawn W. .
JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2012, 21 (01) :29-35
[4]   Intra- and intertester reliability and criterion validity of the parallelogram and universal goniometers for measuring maximum active knee flexion and extension of patients with knee restrictions [J].
Brosseau, L ;
Balmer, S ;
Tousignant, M ;
O'Sullivan, JP ;
Goudreault, C ;
Goudreault, M ;
Gringras, S .
ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 2001, 82 (03) :396-402
[5]   Digital goniometric measurement of knee joint motion. Evaluation of usefulness for research settings and clinical practice [J].
Cleffen, Berry ;
van Breukelen, Gerard ;
Brink, Peter ;
van Mameren, Henk ;
Olde Damink, Steven .
KNEE, 2007, 14 (05) :385-389
[6]   Pronation and supination after forearm fractures in children: Reliability of visual estimation and conventional goniometry measurement [J].
Colaris, Joost ;
van der Linden, Marleen ;
Selles, Ruud ;
Coene, Napoleon ;
Allema, Jan Hein ;
Verhaar, Jan .
INJURY-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE CARE OF THE INJURED, 2010, 41 (06) :643-646
[7]   Procedural considerations for photographic-based joint angle measurements [J].
Dunlevy, Colin ;
Cooney, Marese ;
Gormely, John .
PHYSIOTHERAPY RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL, 2005, 10 (04) :190-200
[8]   Joint angle measurement: a comparative study of the reliability of goniometry and wire tracing for the hand [J].
Ellis, B ;
Bruton, A ;
Goddard, JR .
CLINICAL REHABILITATION, 1997, 11 (04) :314-320
[9]   Reliability of a New Application for Smartphones (DrGoniometer) for Elbow Angle Measurement [J].
Ferriero, Giorgio ;
Sartorio, Francesco ;
Foti, Calogero ;
Primavera, Diego ;
Brigatti, Elisa ;
Vercelli, Stefano .
PM&R, 2011, 3 (12) :1153-1154
[10]   SOURCES OF GONIOMETRIC ERROR AT THE ELBOW [J].
FISH, DR ;
WINGATE, L .
PHYSICAL THERAPY, 1985, 65 (11) :1666-1670