Characteristics of interbody bone graft fusion after transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion according to intervertebral space division

被引:1
|
作者
Xu, Songjie [1 ]
Zang, Lei [2 ]
Lu, Qian [1 ]
Zhao, Peng [1 ]
Wu, Qichao [2 ]
Chen, Xueming [1 ]
机构
[1] Capital Med Univ, Beijing Luhe Hosp, Dept Orthoped, Beijing, Peoples R China
[2] Capital Med Univ, Beijing Chaoyang Hosp, Dept Orthoped, Beijing, Peoples R China
来源
FRONTIERS IN SURGERY | 2022年 / 9卷
关键词
lumbar vertebra; interbody fusion; CT; intervertebral space division; inner cage; POSTEROLATERAL FUSION; SPINAL-FUSION; CAGES; DISKECTOMY; ALLOGRAFT;
D O I
10.3389/fsurg.2022.1004230
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
BackgroundAccording to intervertebral space division, the characteristics of interbody bone graft fusion after transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) were assessed via computed tomography (CT) scan to provide a theoretical basis for selecting the bone grafting site of interbody fusion. MethodsThe medical records of 57 patients with lumbar spinal stenosis and disc herniation treated with TLIF were analysed retrospectively. In total, 57 segments received lumbar interbody fusion. A thin-layer CT scan was performed to evaluate fusion in each zone of the fusion space. ResultsThe fusion rates were 57.89% (n = 33) in the anterior cage zone, 73.68% (n = 42) in the posterior cage zone, 66.67% (n = 38) in the decompression zone, 26.32% (n = 15) in the contralateral decompression zone and 94.74% (n = 54) in the inner cage zone. There were significant differences among the fusion rates of the five zones (P < 0.001). Further pairwise comparison revealed that the fusion rates in the inner cage significantly differed from the anterior and posterior cages and decompression and contralateral decompression zones (P = 0.001, 0.002, 0.001 and 0.001, respectively). ConclusionWe think the central cage zone (i.e., inner cage) should be the focus of bone grafting. Although there is small volume of bone graft on the posterior cage zone, the fusion rate is relatively high, only secondary to the inner cage zone. The fusion rate is of the contralateral decompression zone is lower although there is a bone graft.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Patient Perceptions of Iliac Crest Bone Grafting in Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion
    Haws, Brittany E.
    Kheche, Benjamin
    Patel, Dil, V
    Cardinal, Kaitlyn L.
    Ganda, Jordan A.
    Singh, Kern
    CLINICAL SPINE SURGERY, 2019, 32 (10): : 430 - 434
  • [42] Is Full-Endoscopic Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Superior to Open Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Single-Level Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis? A Retrospective Study
    Yin, Jianjian
    Jiang, Xijia
    Xu, Nanwei
    Nong, Luming
    Jiang, Yuqing
    JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGICAL SURGERY PART A-CENTRAL EUROPEAN NEUROSURGERY, 2024, 85 (01) : 39 - 47
  • [43] Intraoperative Endplate Injury Following Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion
    Shi, Hang
    Wang, Xiao-Hu
    Zhu, Lei
    Chen, Lu
    Jiang, Zan -Li
    Wu, Xiao-Tao
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2022, 168 : E110 - E118
  • [44] Prospective Study of Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion With Either Interbody Graft or Interbody Cage in the Treatment of Degenerative Spondylolisthesis
    Sivaraman, A.
    Altaf, Farhaan
    Jalgaonkar, Azal
    Kakkar, Rahul
    Sirigiri, P. B. R.
    Howieson, A.
    Crawford, Robert J.
    JOURNAL OF SPINAL DISORDERS & TECHNIQUES, 2015, 28 (08): : E467 - E471
  • [45] History and Evolution of the Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion
    Prabhu, Michael C.
    Jacob, Kevin C.
    Patel, Madhav R.
    Pawlowski, Hanna
    Vanjani, Nisheka N.
    Singh, Kern
    NEUROSPINE, 2022, 19 (03) : 479 - 491
  • [46] Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (TLIF) and Unilateral Transpedicular Fixation
    Rapan, Sasa
    Jovanovic, Savo
    Gulan, Gordan
    COLLEGIUM ANTROPOLOGICUM, 2010, 34 (02) : 531 - 534
  • [47] Design of a Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (TLIF) Spine Cage
    Faadhila, Afrah
    Rahman, Siti Fauziyah
    Whulanza, Yudan
    Supriadi, Sugeng
    Tampubolon, Joshua Yoshihiko
    Wicaksana, Septian Indra
    Rahyussalim, Ahmad Jabir
    Kurniawati, Tri
    Abdullah, Abdul Halim
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY, 2022, 13 (08) : 1663 - 1671
  • [48] Comparison of Postoperative Outcomes Between Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
    Lin, Lu
    Liu, Xiao-Qin
    Shi, Lei
    Cheng, Si
    Wang, Zhi-Qiang
    Ge, Qi-Jun
    Gao, Ding-Zhi
    Ismail, Amadou Cheffou
    Ke, Zhen-Yong
    Chu, Lei
    FRONTIERS IN SURGERY, 2022, 9
  • [49] Differences in the interbody bone graft area and fusion rate between minimally invasive and traditional open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a retrospective short-term image analysis
    Yao, Yu-Cheng
    Lin, Hsi-Hsien
    Chou, Po-Hsin
    Wang, Shih-Tien
    Chang, Ming-Chau
    EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2019, 28 (09) : 2095 - 2102
  • [50] Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) versus posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) in lumbar spondylolisthesis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    de Kunder, Suzanne L.
    van Kuijk, Sander M. J.
    Rijkers, Kim
    Caelers, Inge J. M. H.
    van Hemert, Wouter L. W.
    de Bie, Rob A.
    van Santbrink, Henk
    SPINE JOURNAL, 2017, 17 (11) : 1712 - 1721