Characteristics of interbody bone graft fusion after transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion according to intervertebral space division

被引:1
|
作者
Xu, Songjie [1 ]
Zang, Lei [2 ]
Lu, Qian [1 ]
Zhao, Peng [1 ]
Wu, Qichao [2 ]
Chen, Xueming [1 ]
机构
[1] Capital Med Univ, Beijing Luhe Hosp, Dept Orthoped, Beijing, Peoples R China
[2] Capital Med Univ, Beijing Chaoyang Hosp, Dept Orthoped, Beijing, Peoples R China
来源
FRONTIERS IN SURGERY | 2022年 / 9卷
关键词
lumbar vertebra; interbody fusion; CT; intervertebral space division; inner cage; POSTEROLATERAL FUSION; SPINAL-FUSION; CAGES; DISKECTOMY; ALLOGRAFT;
D O I
10.3389/fsurg.2022.1004230
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
BackgroundAccording to intervertebral space division, the characteristics of interbody bone graft fusion after transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) were assessed via computed tomography (CT) scan to provide a theoretical basis for selecting the bone grafting site of interbody fusion. MethodsThe medical records of 57 patients with lumbar spinal stenosis and disc herniation treated with TLIF were analysed retrospectively. In total, 57 segments received lumbar interbody fusion. A thin-layer CT scan was performed to evaluate fusion in each zone of the fusion space. ResultsThe fusion rates were 57.89% (n = 33) in the anterior cage zone, 73.68% (n = 42) in the posterior cage zone, 66.67% (n = 38) in the decompression zone, 26.32% (n = 15) in the contralateral decompression zone and 94.74% (n = 54) in the inner cage zone. There were significant differences among the fusion rates of the five zones (P < 0.001). Further pairwise comparison revealed that the fusion rates in the inner cage significantly differed from the anterior and posterior cages and decompression and contralateral decompression zones (P = 0.001, 0.002, 0.001 and 0.001, respectively). ConclusionWe think the central cage zone (i.e., inner cage) should be the focus of bone grafting. Although there is small volume of bone graft on the posterior cage zone, the fusion rate is relatively high, only secondary to the inner cage zone. The fusion rate is of the contralateral decompression zone is lower although there is a bone graft.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Effect of Approach Based Lumbar Interbody Fusion on Sagittal Spinopelvic Parameters and Functional Outcomes: Comparison between Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion (OLIF) and Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (TLIF)
    Jain, Mantu
    Sethy, Siddharth S.
    Sahoo, Auroshish
    Khan, Shahnawaz
    Tripathy, Sujit
    Ramasubbu, Mathan Kumar
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDICS, 2025, 59 (01) : 40 - 46
  • [32] Comparative effectiveness of two different interbody fusion methods for transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: cage versus morselized impacted bone grafts
    Chaoliang Lv
    Xianzhou Li
    Haicheng Zhang
    Junrong Lv
    Hongmei Zhang
    BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 16
  • [33] Posterolateral lumbar fusion versus transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of degenerative lumbar scoliosis
    Li, Fang-cai
    Chen, Qi-xin
    Chen, Wei-shan
    Xu, Kan
    Wu, Qiong-hua
    Chen, Gang
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NEUROSCIENCE, 2013, 20 (09) : 1241 - 1245
  • [34] Comparative effectiveness of two different interbody fusion methods for transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: cage versus morselized impacted bone grafts
    Lv, Chaoliang
    Li, Xianzhou
    Zhang, Haicheng
    Lv, Junrong
    Zhang, Hongmei
    BMC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS, 2015, 16
  • [35] Comparative analysis of the efficacy of oblique lateral interbody fusion versus transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in the treatment of lumbar disc herniation
    Chen, Daodong
    Liu, Tao
    Du, Kunyang
    Zhu, Zhenjun
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2024, 14 (01):
  • [36] The relation between zoledronic acid infusion and interbody fusion in patients undergoing transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion surgery
    Li, Chao
    Wang, Hui-Ren
    Li, Xi-Lei
    Zhou, Xiao-Gang
    Dong, Jian
    ACTA NEUROCHIRURGICA, 2012, 154 (04) : 731 - 738
  • [37] Usefulness of Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion at L5-S1 Level Compared to Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion
    Mun, Hah Yong
    Ko, Myeong Jin
    Kim, Young Baeg
    Park, Seung Won
    JOURNAL OF KOREAN NEUROSURGICAL SOCIETY, 2020, 63 (06) : 723 - 729
  • [38] Percutaneous transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of degenerative lumbar instability
    Scheufler, Kai-Michael
    Dohmen, Hildegard
    Vougioukas, Vassilios I.
    NEUROSURGERY, 2007, 60 (04) : 203 - 212
  • [39] Complications associated with single-level transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion
    Rihn, Jeffrey A.
    Patel, Ravi
    Makda, Junaid
    Hong, Joseph
    Anderson, David G.
    Vaccaro, Alexander R.
    Hilibrand, Alan S.
    Albert, Todd J.
    SPINE JOURNAL, 2009, 9 (08) : 623 - 629
  • [40] Modified Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Technique Can Potentially Improve Safety of Interbody Graft Placement
    Kurtom, Khalid H.
    Towers, Wendy S.
    OPERATIVE NEUROSURGERY, 2018, 15 (03) : 296 - 301