European guidelines for quality assurance in colorectal cancer screening and diagnosis. First Edition Organisation

被引:29
作者
Malila, N. [1 ]
Senore, C. [2 ,3 ]
Armaroli, P. [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Finnish Canc Registry, FIN-00130 Helsinki, Finland
[2] CPO Piemonte, Turin, Italy
[3] CPO Piemonte, S Giovanni Univ Hosp, Turin, Italy
关键词
mass screening; colorectal neoplasms; organisation; implementation; multidisciplinary evidence-based guidelines; population-based programmes;
D O I
10.1055/s-0032-1309783
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Multidisciplinary, evidence-based guidelines for quality assurance in colorectal cancer screening and diagnosis have been developed by experts in a project coordinated by the International Agency for Research on Cancer. The full guideline document covers the entire process of population-based screening. It consists of 10 chapters and over 250 recommendations, graded according to the strength of the recommendation and the supporting evidence. The 450-page guidelines and the extensive evidence base have been published by the European Commission. The chapter on organisation includes 29 graded recommendations. The content of the chapter is presented here to promote international discussion and collaboration by making the principles and standards recommended in the new EU Guidelines known to a wider professional and scientific community. Following these recommendations has the potential to enhance the control of colorectal cancer through improvement in the quality and effectiveness of the screening process, including multi-disciplinary diagnosis and management of the disease.
引用
收藏
页码:SE31 / SE48
页数:18
相关论文
共 131 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1968, PUBLIC HLTH PAP, DOI DOI 10.1001/ARCHINTE.1969.00300130131020
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2005, IARC handbooks of cancer prevention
[3]   A randomized single-blind trial of split-dose PEG-electrolyte solution without dietary restriction compared with whole dose PEG-electrolyte solution with dietary restriction for colonoscopy preparation [J].
Aoun, E ;
Abdul-Baki, H ;
Azar, C ;
Mourad, F ;
Barada, K ;
Berro, Z ;
Tarchichi, M ;
Sharara, AI .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2005, 62 (02) :213-218
[4]   European guidelines for quality assurance in colorectal cancer screening and diagnosis. First Edition Colonoscopic surveillance following adenoma removal [J].
Atkin, W. S. ;
Valori, R. ;
Kuipers, E. J. ;
Hoff, G. ;
Senore, C. ;
Segnan, N. ;
Jover, R. ;
Schmiegel, W. ;
Lambert, R. ;
Pox, C. .
ENDOSCOPY, 2012, 44 :SE151-SE163
[5]   Single blind, randomised trial of efficacy and acceptability of oral Picolax versus self administered phosphate enema in bowel preparation for flexible sigmoidoscopy screening [J].
Atkin, WS ;
Hart, A ;
Edwards, R ;
Cook, CF ;
Wardle, J ;
McIntyre, P ;
Aubrey, R ;
Baron, C ;
Sutton, S ;
Cuzick, J ;
Senapati, A ;
Northover, JMA .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2000, 320 (7248) :1504-1508
[6]   European guidelines for quality assurance in colorectal cancer screening and diagnosis. First Edition Communication [J].
Austoker, J. ;
Giordano, L. ;
Hewitson, P. ;
Villain, P. .
ENDOSCOPY, 2012, 44 :SE164-SE185
[7]   Measures of familial aggregation depend on definition of family history: meta-analysis for colorectal cancer [J].
Baglietto, L ;
Jenkins, MA ;
Severi, G ;
Giles, GG ;
Bishop, DT ;
Boyle, P ;
Hopper, JL .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2006, 59 (02) :114-124
[8]   Interventions to improve follow-up of abnormal findings in cancer screening [J].
Bastani, R ;
Yabroff, KR ;
Myers, RE ;
Glenn, B .
CANCER, 2004, 101 (05) :1188-1200
[9]   Association of Colonoscopy and Death From Colorectal Cancer [J].
Baxter, Nancy N. ;
Goldwasser, Meredith A. ;
Paszat, Lawrence F. ;
Saskin, Refik ;
Urbach, David R. ;
Rabeneck, Linda .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2009, 150 (01) :1-W1
[10]   Systematic review: oral bowel preparation for colonoscopy [J].
Belsey, J. ;
Epstein, O. ;
Heresbach, D. .
ALIMENTARY PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 2007, 25 (04) :373-384