Quantifying the uncertainties in life cycle greenhouse gas emissions for UK wheat ethanol

被引:14
作者
Yan, Xiaoyu [1 ,2 ]
Boies, Adam M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cambridge, Dept Engn, Cambridge CB2 1PZ, England
[2] Univ Exeter, Environm & Sustainabil Inst, Penryn TR10 9EZ, Cornwall, England
基金
英国工程与自然科学研究理事会;
关键词
life cycle; greenhouse gas emissions; uncertainty; biofuel; ethanol; wheat; LAND-USE CHANGE; BIOFUEL PRODUCTION; BIOETHANOL; IMPACT; GRAIN; LCA;
D O I
10.1088/1748-9326/8/1/015024
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Biofuels are increasingly promoted worldwide as a means for reducing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from transport. However, current regulatory frameworks and most academic life cycle analyses adopt a deterministic approach in determining the GHG intensities of biofuels and thus ignore the inherent risk associated with biofuel production. This study aims to develop a transparent stochastic method for evaluating UK biofuels that determines both the magnitude and uncertainty of GHG intensity on the basis of current industry practices. Using wheat ethanol as a case study, we show that the GHG intensity could span a range of 40-110 gCO(2)e MJ(-1) when land use change (LUC) emissions and various sources of uncertainty are taken into account, as compared with a regulatory default value of 44 gCO(2)e MJ(-1). This suggests that the current deterministic regulatory framework underestimates wheat ethanol GHG intensity and thus may not be effective in evaluating transport fuels. Uncertainties in determining the GHG intensity of UK wheat ethanol include limitations of available data at a localized scale, and significant scientific uncertainty of parameters such as soil N2O and LUC emissions. Biofuel polices should be robust enough to incorporate the currently irreducible uncertainties and flexible enough to be readily revised when better science is available.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 51 条
[1]  
AEA, 2010, REG EM BIOF CULT
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2012, 2012 GUID DEFRA DECC
[3]  
[Anonymous], DIG UK EN STAT 2012
[4]  
[Anonymous], EFFACING RAPE
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2012, Renewables 2012 Global Status Report
[6]  
Audsley E., 2009, ESTIMATION GREENHOUS
[7]   Recent trends in global production and utilization of bio-ethanol fuel [J].
Balat, Mustafa ;
Balat, Havva .
APPLIED ENERGY, 2009, 86 (11) :2273-2282
[8]   A limited LCA comparing large- and small-scale production of ethanol for heavy engines under Swedish conditions [J].
Bernesson, S ;
Nilsson, D ;
Hansson, PA .
BIOMASS & BIOENERGY, 2006, 30 (01) :46-57
[9]   Quantifying the effects of fungicides and disease resistance on greenhouse gas emissions associated with wheat production [J].
Berry, P. M. ;
Kindred, D. R. ;
Paveley, N. D. .
PLANT PATHOLOGY, 2008, 57 (06) :1000-1008
[10]   Implications of local lifecycle analyses and low carbon fuel standard design on gasohol transportation fuels [J].
Boies, Adam M. ;
McFarlane, Dane ;
Taff, Steven ;
Watts, Winthrop F. ;
Kittelson, David B. .
ENERGY POLICY, 2011, 39 (11) :7191-7201