Reducing metal artifacts between implants in cone-beam CT by adjusting angular position of the subject

被引:9
作者
Min, Chang-Ki [1 ]
Kim, Kyoung-A [1 ]
机构
[1] Jeonbuk Natl Univ, Sch Dent, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Radiol, Gunjiro 20, Jeonju, South Korea
关键词
Diagnostic imaging; Cone-beam computed tomography; Artifacts; Dental implant; REDUCTION; CBCT; SCATTER; MOTION; RANGE;
D O I
10.1007/s11282-020-00458-7
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Objectives To reduce inter-implant metal artifacts in cone-beam CT (CBCT) imaging by adjusting angular position of the subject relative to the source-detector plane. Materials and methods Two dental implants were placed in a block made of homogeneous dental impression material. Using a custom-made apparatus, the specimen was scanned with a CBCT machine at seven different angles (0 degrees, 15 degrees, 30 degrees, 45 degrees, 60 degrees, 75 degrees, and 90 degrees) along three different spatial axes, yielding 21 experimental groups. Thirteen volumes of interest (VOI) including inter- and peri-implant areas were selected from each axial reconstruction perpendicular to the implants. Gray values (GVs) of each pixel within these VOIs were measured. Mean differences in GV (Delta GV) between the VOIs and control area were calculated and expressed as a percentage. These Delta GVs from different spatial angle were compared and analyzed by Welch's analysis of variance (ANOVA) and linear regression using SPSS 25.0 software. Results As alpha angle increased, the Delta GV of the inter-implant area increased from - 62.02% to near-zero while the standard deviation decreased. Welch's ANOVA and linear regression analysis revealed Delta GV increased significantly with alpha angle (p < 0.001,R-2 = 0.406). VOIs on the extension line of two implants showed similar results. After adjusting the beta and gamma angles, there was no significant change in Delta GV. Conclusions Increasing the alpha angle can reduce metal artifacts in the inter-implant area in CBCT images.
引用
收藏
页码:385 / 394
页数:10
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]   A post-reconstruction method to correct cupping artifacts in cone beam breast computed tomography [J].
Altunbas, M. C. ;
Shaw, C. C. ;
Chen, L. ;
Lai, C. ;
Liu, X. ;
Han, T. ;
Wang, T. .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2007, 34 (07) :3109-3118
[2]   Artifacts in CT: Recognition and avoidance [J].
Barrett, JF ;
Keat, N .
RADIOGRAPHICS, 2004, 24 (06) :1679-1691
[3]   Metal artefact reduction with cone beam CT: an in vitro study [J].
Bechara, B. B. ;
Moore, W. S. ;
McMahan, C. A. ;
Noujeim, M. .
DENTOMAXILLOFACIAL RADIOLOGY, 2012, 41 (03) :248-253
[4]  
Brown JH, 1999, AM J NEURORADIOL, V20, P694
[5]   Metallic materials in the exomass impair cone beam CT voxel values [J].
Candemil, Amanda P. ;
Salmon, Benjamin ;
Freitas, Deborah Q. ;
Ambrosano, Glaucia M. B. ;
Haiter-Neto, Francisco ;
Oliveira, Matheus L. .
DENTOMAXILLOFACIAL RADIOLOGY, 2018, 47 (06)
[6]   Evaluation of cervical range of motion and isometric neck muscle strength: reliability and validity [J].
Chiu, TTW ;
Lo, SK .
CLINICAL REHABILITATION, 2002, 16 (08) :851-858
[7]   Quantitative evaluation of metal artifacts using different CBCT devices, high-density materials and field of views [J].
Codari, Marina ;
Vasconcelos, Karla de Faria ;
Pinheiro Nicolielo, Laura Ferreira ;
Neto, Francisco Haiter ;
Jacobs, Reinhilde .
CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2017, 28 (12) :1509-1514
[8]  
De Man B., 1998, 1998 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record. 1998 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference (Cat. No.98CH36255), P1860, DOI 10.1109/NSSMIC.1998.773898
[9]   Beam hardening artefacts occur in dental implant scans with the NewTom® cone beam CT but not with the dental 4-row multidetector CT [J].
Draenert, F. G. ;
Coppenrath, E. ;
Herzog, P. ;
Muller, S. ;
Mueller-Lisse, U. G. .
DENTOMAXILLOFACIAL RADIOLOGY, 2007, 36 (04) :198-203
[10]   COMPTON SCATTER EFFECTS IN CT RECONSTRUCTIONS [J].
GLOVER, GH .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1982, 9 (06) :860-867