Contact sensitisation in patients with chronic leg ulcers

被引:11
作者
Artuz, Ferda [1 ]
Yilmaz, Emrah [1 ]
Cakmak, Seray Kulcu [1 ]
Duzgun, Arife Polat [2 ]
机构
[1] Ankara Numune Training & Res Hosp, Dermatol Clin, Ankara, Turkey
[2] Ankara Numune Training & Res Hosp, Gen Surg Clin, Ankara, Turkey
关键词
Contact sensitisation; Leg ulcers; Patch testing; SERIES; ALLERGENS; SENSITIVITY; DERMATITIS; PREVALENCE;
D O I
10.1111/iwj.12442
中图分类号
R75 [皮肤病学与性病学];
学科分类号
100206 ;
摘要
The aim of our study is to identify the allergens in patients with leg ulcers who have contact dermatitis surrounding the skin of the ulcer and compare them with a control group consisting of patients with lower extremity contact dermatitis. A total of 40 patients with chronic leg ulcers (CLU) and contact dermatitis around the skin of ulcer were included in the study. As a control group, 20 patients with contact dermatitis of lower extremity without leg ulcers were included. The patient and control groups were patch tested with 37 allergens of the European Standard Series. Of the 40 patients, 31 (77<bold></bold>5%) had positivity to one or more allergens, and 10 (50%) of the control group patients had positivity to one or more allergens. The number of patients who had positivity to at least one allergen was significantly higher in the patient group (P < 0<bold></bold>05). Positivity to the balsam of Peru and benzocaine was significantly higher in the patient group than that in the control group (P < 0<bold></bold>05). Contact sensitisation to benzocaine and balsam of Peru was found to be associated with the presence of CLU. The efficacy of therapy in patients with leg ulcers might be increased by avoiding these allergens.
引用
收藏
页码:1190 / 1192
页数:3
相关论文
共 12 条
  • [1] Contact sensitivity to standard series allergens in 1038 patients with contact dermatitis in Turkey
    Akyol, A
    Boyvat, A
    Peksari, Y
    Gürgey, E
    [J]. CONTACT DERMATITIS, 2005, 52 (06) : 333 - 337
  • [2] Balsam of Peru or Balsam of El Salvador
    Amado, Antoine
    Taylor, James S.
    [J]. CONTACT DERMATITIS, 2006, 55 (02) : 119 - 119
  • [3] Contact allergy in chronic leg ulcers: results of a multicentre study carried out in 423 patients and proposal for an updated series of patch tests
    Barbaud, Annick
    Collet, Evelyne
    Le Coz, Christophe J.
    Meaume, Sylvie
    Gillois, Pierre
    [J]. CONTACT DERMATITIS, 2009, 60 (05) : 279 - 287
  • [4] Contact Sensitization to the Allergens of European Baseline Series in Patients With Chronic Leg Ulcers
    Beliauskiene, Aiste
    Valiukeviciene, Skaidra
    Sitkauskiene, Brigita
    Schnuch, Axel
    Uter, Wolfgang
    [J]. MEDICINA-LITHUANIA, 2011, 47 (09): : 480 - 485
  • [5] Allergic Contact Dermatitis to Benzocaine: The Importance of Concomitant Positive Patch Test Results
    Gonzalez-Rodriguez, A. J.
    Gutierrez-Paredes, E. M.
    Revert Fernandez, A.
    Jorda-Cuevas, E.
    [J]. ACTAS DERMO-SIFILIOGRAFICAS, 2013, 104 (02): : 156 - 158
  • [6] Katsarou-Katsari A, 1998, J EUR ACAD DERMATOL, V11, P9, DOI 10.1111/j.1468-3083.1998.tb00946.x
  • [7] Lachapelle J.M., 2009, Patch Testing and Prick Testing: A Practical Guide Official Publication of the ICDRG, P33, DOI [10.1007/978-3-540-92806-5_3, DOI 10.1007/978-3-540-92806-5_3]
  • [8] A high prevalence of sensitization still persists in leg ulcer patients:: a retrospective series of 106 patients tested between 2001 and 2002 and a meta-analysis of 1975-2003 data
    Machet, L
    Couhé, C
    Perrinaud, A
    Hoarau, C
    Lorette, G
    Vaillant, L
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGY, 2004, 150 (05) : 929 - 935
  • [9] CONTACT-DERMATITIS IN PATIENTS WITH LEG ULCERS - THE PREVALENCE OF LATE POSITIVE REACTIONS AND EVIDENCE AGAINST SYSTEMIC AMPLIATIVE ALLERGY
    PARAMSOTHY, Y
    COLLINS, M
    SMITH, AG
    [J]. CONTACT DERMATITIS, 1988, 18 (01) : 30 - 36
  • [10] Contact sensitivity in patients with leg ulcerations - A North American study
    Saap, L
    Fahim, S
    Arsenault, E
    Pratt, M
    Pierscianowski, T
    Falanga, V
    Pedvis-Leftick, A
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF DERMATOLOGY, 2004, 140 (10) : 1241 - 1246