Virtual Reality Cognitive Therapy in Inpatient Psychiatric Wards: Protocol for a Qualitative Investigation of Staff and Patient Views Across Multiple National Health Service Sites

被引:7
作者
Brown, Poppy [1 ]
Waite, Felicity [1 ,2 ]
Lambe, Sinead [1 ,2 ]
Rosebrock, Laina [1 ,2 ]
Freeman, Daniel [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Oxford, Dept Psychiat, Oxford, England
[2] Oxford Hlth NHS Fdn Trust, Oxford, England
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
virtual reality; therapy; inpatient psychiatric care; implementation; CARE; DISORDERS; LIFE;
D O I
10.2196/20300
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Patients in psychiatric wards typically have very limited access to individual psychological therapy. Inpatients often have significant time available, and an important transition back to everyday life to prepare for-but historically, there have been few trained therapists available on wards for the delivery of evidence-based therapy. Automated virtual reality (VR) therapy may be one route to increase the provision of powerful psychological treatments in psychiatric hospitals. The gameChange automated VR cognitive therapy is targeted at helping patients overcome anxious avoidance and re-engage in everyday situations (such as walking down the street, taking a bus, or going to a shop). This treatment target may fit well for many patients preparing for discharge. However, little is known about how VR therapy may be viewed in this setting. Objective: The objectives of the study are to explore psychiatric hospital staff and patients' initial expectations of VR therapy, to gather patient and staff views of an automated VR cognitive therapy (gameChange) after briefly experiencing it, and to identify potential differences across National Health Service (NHS) mental health trusts for implementation. Guided by an implementation framework, the knowledge gained from this study will be used to assess the feasibility of VR treatment adoption into psychiatric hospitals. Methods: Focus groups will be conducted with NHS staff and patients in acute psychiatric wards at 5 NHS mental health trusts across England. Staff and patients will be interviewed in separate groups. Individual interviews will also be conducted when preferred by a participant. Within each of the 5 trusts, 1 to 2 wards will be visited. A total of 8-15 staff and patients per ward will be recruited, with a minimum total of 50 staff and patients recruited across all sites. Focus group questions have been derived from the nonadoption, abandonment, and challenges to the scale-up, spread, and sustainability (NASSS) framework. Focus groups will discuss expectations of VR therapy before participants are given the opportunity to briefly try the gameChange VR therapy. Questions will then focus on opinions about the therapy and investigate feasibility of adoption, with particular consideration given to site specific issues. A thematic analysis will be conducted. Results: As of May 15, 2020, 1 patient focus group has been conducted. Conclusions: The study will provide unique insight from patients and staff into the potential for implementing automated VR therapy in psychiatric wards. Perspectives will be captured both on the use of immersive technology hardware and therapy-specific issues in such settings.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 49 条
[1]   Understanding Implementation of a Digital Self-Monitoring Intervention for Relapse Prevention in Psychosis: Protocol for a Mixed Method Process Evaluation [J].
Allan, Stephanie ;
Mcleod, Hamish ;
Bradstreet, Simon ;
Beedie, Sara ;
Moir, Bethany ;
Gleeson, John ;
Farhall, John ;
Morton, Emma ;
Gumley, Andrew .
JMIR RESEARCH PROTOCOLS, 2019, 8 (12)
[2]   Developing a Hypothetical Implementation Framework of Expectations for Monitoring Early Signs of Psychosis Relapse Using a Mobile App: Qualitative Study [J].
Allan, Stephanie ;
Bradstreet, Simon ;
Mcleod, Hamish ;
Farhall, John ;
Lambrou, Maria ;
Gleeson, John ;
Clark, Andrea ;
Gumley, Andrew .
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2019, 21 (10)
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2007, JPI, DOI DOI 10.1017/S1742646407001136
[4]   Checklists for improving rigour in qualitative research: a case of the tail wagging the dog? [J].
Barbour, RS .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2001, 322 (7294) :1115-1117
[5]  
Bertrand JT, 2016, EVALUATION REV, V16, P198
[6]  
Braun V, 2006, Qualitative Research in Psychology, V3, P77, DOI [DOI 10.1191/1478088706QP063OA, 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa, DOI 10.1080/14780887.2020.1769238]
[7]  
Catterall M, 2017, SOCIOLOGICAL RES ONL, V2, P41, DOI [10.5153/sro.67, DOI 10.5153/SRO.67]
[8]   Meta-analysis of suicide rates in the first week and the first month after psychiatric hospitalisation [J].
Chung, Daniel ;
Hadzi-Pavlovic, Dusan ;
Wang, Maggie ;
Swaraj, Sascha ;
Olfson, Mark ;
Large, Matthew .
BMJ OPEN, 2019, 9 (03)
[9]   Anxiety disorders: why they persist and how to treat them [J].
Clark, DM .
BEHAVIOUR RESEARCH AND THERAPY, 1999, 37 :S5-S27
[10]  
Clarke I, 2009, J PSYCHIATR MENT HLT, DOI [10.1111/j.1365-2850.2009.01436.x, DOI 10.1111/J.1365-2850.2009.01436.X]