Genotypic difference of cadmium tolerance and the associated microRNAs in wild and cultivated barley

被引:13
|
作者
Yu, Jiahua [1 ]
Wu, Liyuan [1 ]
Fu, Liangbo [1 ]
Shen, Qiufang [1 ]
Kuang, Liuhui [1 ]
Wu, Dezhi [1 ]
Zhang, Guoping [1 ]
机构
[1] Zhejiang Univ, Dept Agron, Key Lab Crop Germplasm Resource Zhejiang Prov, Hangzhou 310058, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
RNA sequencing; Degradome analysis; MiRNA; Target gene; Cd stress; GENOME-WIDE IDENTIFICATION; RESPONSIVE MICRORNAS; CD ACCUMULATION; SCARECROW GENE; AUXIN RESPONSE; ARABIDOPSIS; STRESS; ROOTS; EXPRESSION; MIRNA;
D O I
10.1007/s10725-019-00479-1
中图分类号
Q94 [植物学];
学科分类号
071001 ;
摘要
Little study was performed to know how microRNAs (miRNAs) are responsive to cadmium (Cd) stress in barley (Hordeum vulgare). In this study, 16 small RNA libraries of shoot and root tissues from a wild barley accession (WB-1) and cultivated barley (Golden Promise) with contrasting Cd tolerance were constructed and sequenced. Moreover, a degradome library was constructed and analyzed to identify target genes of the miRNAs. Based on high-throughput sequencing, 216 conserved miRNAs (in 59 miRNA families) and 87 novel miRNAs were identified. A total of 238 target genes for 149 miRNAs (113 conserved and 36 novel miRNAs) were detected by the degradome analysis. Among these miRNAs, 45 miRNAs (40 conserved and 5 novel miRNAs) and 43 miRNAs (40 conserved and 3 novel miRNAs) showed differential expression in roots and shoots of two genotypes under Cd conditions. Compared with cultivar Golden Promise, the wild genotype WB-1 had genotype-dependent responses of miR156, miR159, miR166, miR167, miR171 and miR393, which regulate target genes including SPL, MYB, HD-Zip, ARF, GRAS and TIR. Correspondingly, WB-1 had lower Cd concentration and stronger Cd tolerance than Golden Promise. It indicates that miRNAs may play critical roles underlying genotypic difference of Cd tolerance in barley.
引用
收藏
页码:389 / 401
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] SOLUTE ADJUSTMENT TO SALINITY AND CALCIUM SUPPLY IN CULTIVATED AND WILD BARLEY
    HUANG, J
    REDMANN, RE
    JOURNAL OF PLANT NUTRITION, 1995, 18 (07) : 1371 - 1389
  • [42] Comparison of Seed Germination Characteristics Between Cultivated and Wild Barley
    Le Xu
    Haoran Gao
    Jun Wu
    Siyu Wang
    Rui Pan
    Wenying Zhang
    Journal of Plant Growth Regulation, 2024, 43 : 231 - 243
  • [43] INHERITANCE OF RESISTANCE TO PUCCINIA-HORDEI IN CULTIVATED AND WILD BARLEY
    JIN, Y
    STEFFENSON, BJ
    JOURNAL OF HEREDITY, 1994, 85 (06) : 451 - 454
  • [44] Association mapping of disease resistance in cultivated and wild barley.
    Steffenson, B. J.
    Smith, K. P.
    Muehlbauer, G. J.
    PHYTOPATHOLOGY, 2007, 97 (07) : S149 - S150
  • [45] GENETIC DIVERSITY AMONG WILD AND CULTIVATED BARLEY AS REVEALED BY RFLP
    PETERSEN, L
    OSTERGARD, H
    GIESE, H
    THEORETICAL AND APPLIED GENETICS, 1994, 89 (06) : 676 - 681
  • [46] Genotypic differences in effect of cadmium on growth parameters of barley during ontogenesis
    Wu, FB
    Qian, QQ
    Zhang, GP
    COMMUNICATIONS IN SOIL SCIENCE AND PLANT ANALYSIS, 2003, 34 (13-14) : 2021 - 2034
  • [47] Tolerance to Low Temperature of Wild, Semi-cultivated, and Cultivated Poinsettia Genotypes
    Navarro-Lopez, Erik
    Teresa Colinas-Leon, Maria
    Sahagun-Castellanos, Jaime
    Cruz-San Pedro, Emmanuel
    Alia-Tejacal, Iran
    HORTSCIENCE, 2004, 39 (04) : 837 - 837
  • [48] Integrated transcriptome and metabolome analysis reveals the divergent evolution of low-P tolerance in cultivated and Tibetan wild barley
    Zhang, Junhao
    Sun, Wenyue
    Zhao, Huifang
    Liang, Qiyu
    Zhang, Guoping
    Cai, Shengguan
    ENVIRONMENTAL AND EXPERIMENTAL BOTANY, 2024, 219
  • [49] Genotypic difference in effect of cadmium on development and mineral concentrations of cotton
    Bachir, DM
    Wu, FB
    Zhang, GP
    Wu, HX
    COMMUNICATIONS IN SOIL SCIENCE AND PLANT ANALYSIS, 2004, 35 (1-2) : 285 - 299
  • [50] The mechanisms for the difference in waterlogging tolerance among sea barley, wheat and barley
    Zhengyuan Xu
    Qiufang Shen
    Guoping Zhang
    Plant Growth Regulation, 2022, 96 : 431 - 441