Genotypic difference of cadmium tolerance and the associated microRNAs in wild and cultivated barley

被引:13
|
作者
Yu, Jiahua [1 ]
Wu, Liyuan [1 ]
Fu, Liangbo [1 ]
Shen, Qiufang [1 ]
Kuang, Liuhui [1 ]
Wu, Dezhi [1 ]
Zhang, Guoping [1 ]
机构
[1] Zhejiang Univ, Dept Agron, Key Lab Crop Germplasm Resource Zhejiang Prov, Hangzhou 310058, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
RNA sequencing; Degradome analysis; MiRNA; Target gene; Cd stress; GENOME-WIDE IDENTIFICATION; RESPONSIVE MICRORNAS; CD ACCUMULATION; SCARECROW GENE; AUXIN RESPONSE; ARABIDOPSIS; STRESS; ROOTS; EXPRESSION; MIRNA;
D O I
10.1007/s10725-019-00479-1
中图分类号
Q94 [植物学];
学科分类号
071001 ;
摘要
Little study was performed to know how microRNAs (miRNAs) are responsive to cadmium (Cd) stress in barley (Hordeum vulgare). In this study, 16 small RNA libraries of shoot and root tissues from a wild barley accession (WB-1) and cultivated barley (Golden Promise) with contrasting Cd tolerance were constructed and sequenced. Moreover, a degradome library was constructed and analyzed to identify target genes of the miRNAs. Based on high-throughput sequencing, 216 conserved miRNAs (in 59 miRNA families) and 87 novel miRNAs were identified. A total of 238 target genes for 149 miRNAs (113 conserved and 36 novel miRNAs) were detected by the degradome analysis. Among these miRNAs, 45 miRNAs (40 conserved and 5 novel miRNAs) and 43 miRNAs (40 conserved and 3 novel miRNAs) showed differential expression in roots and shoots of two genotypes under Cd conditions. Compared with cultivar Golden Promise, the wild genotype WB-1 had genotype-dependent responses of miR156, miR159, miR166, miR167, miR171 and miR393, which regulate target genes including SPL, MYB, HD-Zip, ARF, GRAS and TIR. Correspondingly, WB-1 had lower Cd concentration and stronger Cd tolerance than Golden Promise. It indicates that miRNAs may play critical roles underlying genotypic difference of Cd tolerance in barley.
引用
收藏
页码:389 / 401
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Phenotypic landscapes: phenological patterns in wild and cultivated barley
    Huebner, S.
    Bdolach, E.
    Ein-Gedy, S.
    Schmid, K. J.
    Korol, A.
    Fridman, E.
    JOURNAL OF EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY, 2013, 26 (01) : 163 - 174
  • [32] Application of genomics in assessing biodiversity in wild and cultivated barley
    Marmiroli, N
    Maestri, E
    Liviero, L
    Massari, A
    Malcevschi, A
    Monciardini, P
    MOLECULAR ECOLOGY, 1999, 8 (12) : S95 - S106
  • [33] MicroRNAs are involved in cadmium tolerance in Daphnia pulex
    Chen, Shuai
    Nichols, Krista M.
    Poynton, Helen C.
    Sepulveda, Maria S.
    AQUATIC TOXICOLOGY, 2016, 175 : 241 - 248
  • [34] The potential contribution of wild barley (Hordeum vulgare ssp spontaneum) germplasm to drought tolerance of cultivated barley (H. vulgare ssp vulgare)
    Lakew, B.
    Eglinton, J.
    Henry, R. J.
    Baum, M.
    Grando, S.
    Ceccarelli, S.
    FIELD CROPS RESEARCH, 2011, 120 (01) : 161 - 168
  • [35] Genotypic difference in salinity tolerance of green gram cultivars
    Misra, N
    Dwivedi, UN
    PLANT SCIENCE, 2004, 166 (05) : 1135 - 1142
  • [36] Preliminary screening of domestic barley and wild barley genotypes for salt tolerance
    Mohammed, Abdullah H.
    Morrison, Jesse I.
    Baldwin, Brian S.
    AGROSYSTEMS GEOSCIENCES & ENVIRONMENT, 2021, 4 (02)
  • [37] Tissue Metabolic Responses to Salt Stress in Wild and Cultivated Barley
    Wu, Dezhi
    Cai, Shengguan
    Chen, Mingxian
    Ye, Lingzhen
    Chen, Zhonghua
    Zhang, Haitao
    Dai, Fei
    Wu, Feibo
    Zhang, Guoping
    PLOS ONE, 2013, 8 (01):
  • [38] Genetic variation at flowering time loci in wild and cultivated barley
    Cockram, James
    Hones, Huw
    O'Sullivan, Donal M.
    PLANT GENETIC RESOURCES-CHARACTERIZATION AND UTILIZATION, 2011, 9 (02): : 264 - 267
  • [40] Comparison of Seed Germination Characteristics Between Cultivated and Wild Barley
    Xu, Le
    Gao, Haoran
    Wu, Jun
    Wang, Siyu
    Pan, Rui
    Zhang, Wenying
    JOURNAL OF PLANT GROWTH REGULATION, 2024, 43 (01) : 231 - 243