Genotypic difference of cadmium tolerance and the associated microRNAs in wild and cultivated barley

被引:13
|
作者
Yu, Jiahua [1 ]
Wu, Liyuan [1 ]
Fu, Liangbo [1 ]
Shen, Qiufang [1 ]
Kuang, Liuhui [1 ]
Wu, Dezhi [1 ]
Zhang, Guoping [1 ]
机构
[1] Zhejiang Univ, Dept Agron, Key Lab Crop Germplasm Resource Zhejiang Prov, Hangzhou 310058, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
RNA sequencing; Degradome analysis; MiRNA; Target gene; Cd stress; GENOME-WIDE IDENTIFICATION; RESPONSIVE MICRORNAS; CD ACCUMULATION; SCARECROW GENE; AUXIN RESPONSE; ARABIDOPSIS; STRESS; ROOTS; EXPRESSION; MIRNA;
D O I
10.1007/s10725-019-00479-1
中图分类号
Q94 [植物学];
学科分类号
071001 ;
摘要
Little study was performed to know how microRNAs (miRNAs) are responsive to cadmium (Cd) stress in barley (Hordeum vulgare). In this study, 16 small RNA libraries of shoot and root tissues from a wild barley accession (WB-1) and cultivated barley (Golden Promise) with contrasting Cd tolerance were constructed and sequenced. Moreover, a degradome library was constructed and analyzed to identify target genes of the miRNAs. Based on high-throughput sequencing, 216 conserved miRNAs (in 59 miRNA families) and 87 novel miRNAs were identified. A total of 238 target genes for 149 miRNAs (113 conserved and 36 novel miRNAs) were detected by the degradome analysis. Among these miRNAs, 45 miRNAs (40 conserved and 5 novel miRNAs) and 43 miRNAs (40 conserved and 3 novel miRNAs) showed differential expression in roots and shoots of two genotypes under Cd conditions. Compared with cultivar Golden Promise, the wild genotype WB-1 had genotype-dependent responses of miR156, miR159, miR166, miR167, miR171 and miR393, which regulate target genes including SPL, MYB, HD-Zip, ARF, GRAS and TIR. Correspondingly, WB-1 had lower Cd concentration and stronger Cd tolerance than Golden Promise. It indicates that miRNAs may play critical roles underlying genotypic difference of Cd tolerance in barley.
引用
收藏
页码:389 / 401
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Genotypic difference of cadmium tolerance and the associated microRNAs in wild and cultivated barley
    Jiahua Yu
    Liyuan Wu
    Liangbo Fu
    Qiufang Shen
    Liuhui Kuang
    Dezhi Wu
    Guoping Zhang
    Plant Growth Regulation, 2019, 87 : 389 - 401
  • [2] Genotypic Difference in the Responses to Nitrogen Fertilizer Form in Tibetan Wild and Cultivated Barley
    Naz, Shama
    Shen, Qiufang
    Lwalaba, Jonas Lwalaba Wa
    Zhang, Guoping
    PLANTS-BASEL, 2021, 10 (03): : 1 - 12
  • [3] Identification of the proteins associated with low potassium tolerance in cultivated and Tibetan wild barley
    Zeng, Jianbin
    He, Xiaoyan
    Quan, Xiaoyan
    Cai, Shengguan
    Han, Yong
    Nadira, Umme Aktari
    Zhang, Guoping
    JOURNAL OF PROTEOMICS, 2015, 126 : 1 - 11
  • [4] Genotypic differences in physiological characteristics in the tolerance to drought and salinity combined stress between Tibetan wild and cultivated barley
    Ahmed, Imrul Mosaddek
    Dai, Huaxin
    Zheng, Weite
    Cao, Fangbin
    Zhang, Guoping
    Sun, Dongfa
    Wu, Feibo
    PLANT PHYSIOLOGY AND BIOCHEMISTRY, 2013, 63 : 49 - 60
  • [5] Identification of microRNAs in response to aluminum stress in the roots of Tibetan wild barley and cultivated barley
    Liyuan Wu
    Jiahua Yu
    Qiufang Shen
    Lu Huang
    Dezhi Wu
    Guoping Zhang
    BMC Genomics, 19
  • [6] Identification of microRNAs in response to aluminum stress in the roots of Tibetan wild barley and cultivated barley
    Wu, Liyuan
    Yu, Jiahua
    Shen, Qiufang
    Huang, Lu
    Wu, Dezhi
    Zhang, Guoping
    BMC GENOMICS, 2018, 19
  • [7] Physiological and Transcriptome Indicators of Salt Tolerance in Wild and Cultivated Barley
    Gharaghanipor, Narges
    Arzani, Ahmad
    Rahimmalek, Mehdi
    Ravash, Rudabeh
    FRONTIERS IN PLANT SCIENCE, 2022, 13
  • [8] GENOTYPIC VARIATION FOR GLYCINEBETAINE ACCUMULATION BY CULTIVATED AND WILD BARLEY IN RELATION TO WATER-STRESS
    LADYMAN, JAR
    DITZ, KM
    GRUMET, R
    HANSON, AD
    CROP SCIENCE, 1983, 23 (03) : 465 - 468
  • [9] Genotypic difference in the influence of aluminum and low pH on ion flux, rhizospheric pH and ATPase activity between Tibetan wild and cultivated barley
    Liu, Wenxing
    Feng, Xue
    Qiu, Yue
    Chen, Zhong-Hua
    Zeng, Fanrong
    Zhang, Guoping
    Wu, Feibo
    ENVIRONMENTAL AND EXPERIMENTAL BOTANY, 2018, 156 : 16 - 24
  • [10] Identification of microRNAs in response to low potassium stress in the shoots of Tibetan wild barley and cultivated
    Ye, Zhilan
    Zeng, Jianbin
    Long, Lizhi
    Ye, Lingzhen
    Zhang, Guoping
    CURRENT PLANT BIOLOGY, 2021, 25