Performance of the Reality® polyurethane female condom and a synthetic latex prototype:: a randomized crossover trial among South African women

被引:40
作者
Beksinska, M [1 ]
Smit, J
Mabude, Z
Vijayakumar, G
Joanis, C
机构
[1] Univ Witwatersrand, Reprod Hlth & HIV Res Unit, ZA-4091 Mayville, South Africa
[2] Brown Univ, Dept Dev Studies, Providence, RI 02912 USA
[3] Family Hlth Int, Res Triangle Pk, NC 27709 USA
关键词
female condom; reality; performance; synthetic latex; randomized trial; barrier methods;
D O I
10.1016/j.contraception.2005.07.015
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: This multisite, randomized, crossover trial comparing the performance of the Reality (R) female condom (FC1) with a new synthetic latex prototype (FC2) was conducted in Durban, South Africa. Method: In total, 276 women were enrolled and 201 women completed the study. Altogether, 1910 FC1 condoms and 1881 FC2 condoms were used. Results: Total breakage was 0.73% in FC1 and 0.85% in FC2 (95% confidence interval, -0.64 to 0.87). The number of clinical breakages (those that could result in a pregnancy or sexually transmitted infection) was similar for each condom type (FC1, n=9; FC2, n=8). Incorrect penetration (penis between condom and vaginal wall) was 1.26% and 0.64% for FC1 and FC2, respectively. Outer ring displacements (outer ring pushed into the vagina partially or fully) were comparable for both condoms (FC1, 3.14%; FC2, 2.98%). Slippage (condom came out of the vagina) was rare and reported in 0.37% or less of devices used. Total clinical failure was 5.24% in FC1 and 4.3% in FC2. Conclusion: The FC1 and FC2 performed comparably within this trial. (c) 2006 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:386 / 393
页数:8
相关论文
共 17 条
[1]  
Beksinska ME, 2001, S AFR MED J, V91, P672
[2]   Structural integrity of the female condom after multiple uses, washing, drying, and re-lubrication [J].
Beksinska, ME ;
Rees, HV ;
Dickson-Tetteh, KE ;
Mqoqi, N ;
Kleinschmidt, I ;
McIntyre, JA .
CONTRACEPTION, 2001, 63 (01) :33-36
[3]   CONTRACEPTIVE EFFICACY AND ACCEPTABILITY OF THE FEMALE CONDOM [J].
FARR, G ;
GABELNICK, H ;
STURGEN, K ;
DORFLINGER, L .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 1994, 84 (12) :1960-1964
[4]   Protection against sexually transmitted diseases by granting sex workers in Thailand the choice of using the male or female condom: results from a randomized controlled trial [J].
Fontanet, AL ;
Saba, J ;
Chandelying, V ;
Sakondhavat, C ;
Bhiraleus, P ;
Rugpao, S ;
Chongsomchai, C ;
Kiriwat, O ;
Tovanabutra, S ;
Dally, L ;
Lange, JM ;
Rojanapithayakorn, W .
AIDS, 1998, 12 (14) :1851-1859
[5]  
Galvao LW, 2005, CONTRACEPTION, V71, P130, DOI 10.1016/j.contraception.2004.08.008
[6]   The acceptability of the female and male condom: A randomized crossover trial [J].
Kulczycki, A ;
Kim, DJ ;
Duerr, A ;
Jamieson, DJ ;
Macaluso, M .
PERSPECTIVES ON SEXUAL AND REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH, 2004, 36 (03) :114-119
[7]  
LEEPER M A, 1989, Advances in Contraception, V5, P229, DOI 10.1007/BF01890894
[8]   Efficacy of the female condom as a barrier to semen during intercourse [J].
Macaluso, M ;
Lawson, ML ;
Hortin, G ;
Duerr, A ;
Hammond, KR ;
Blackwell, R ;
Bloom, A .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2003, 157 (04) :289-297
[9]   Latex condom breakage and slippage in a controlled clinical trial [J].
Rosenberg, MJ ;
Waugh, MS .
CONTRACEPTION, 1997, 56 (01) :17-21
[10]   Perceptions and acceptability of the female condom [Femidom®] amongst commercial sex workers in the Songkla province, Thailand [J].
Sinpisut, P ;
Chandeying, V ;
Skov, S ;
Uahgowitchai, C .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF STD & AIDS, 1998, 9 (03) :168-172