The influence of triage systems and triage scores on timeliness of ED analgesic administration

被引:35
作者
Ducharme, James [2 ]
Tanabe, Paula [3 ,4 ]
Homel, Peter [5 ]
Miner, James R. [6 ,7 ]
Chang, Andrew K. [8 ]
Lee, Jacques [9 ]
Todd, Knox H. [1 ]
机构
[1] Albert Einstein Coll Med, Beth Israel Med Ctr, Pain & Emergency Med Inst, Dept Emergency Med, New York, NY 10003 USA
[2] Dalhousie Univ, Dept Emergency Med, St John, NB B3H, Canada
[3] Northwestern Univ, Dept Emergency Med, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
[4] Northwestern Univ, Inst Healthcare Studies, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
[5] Beth Israel Deaconess Med Ctr, Dept Pain Med & Palliat Care, New York, NY 10003 USA
[6] Univ Minnesota, Sch Med, Dept Emergency Med, Minneapolis, MN 55415 USA
[7] Hennepin Cty Med Ctr, Dept Emergency Med, Minneapolis, MN 55415 USA
[8] Albert Einstein Coll Med, Dept Emergency Med, Montefiore Med Ctr, Bronx, NY 10467 USA
[9] Sunnybrook Hlth Sci Ctr, Toronto, ON M4N 3MS, Canada
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.ajem.2007.11.020
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Objectives: The aim of the study was to examine the association between triage scoring systems and triage priority scores on time to initial emergency department (ED) analgesic administration. Methods: An observational, multicenter, prospective, cohort study was conducted at 20 US and Canadian EDs. Centers from the United States used the Emergency Severity Index triage system or 1 of 3 unvalidated triage systems. Canadian centers used the Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale. Patients aged 8 years or older who presented to the ED with a chief complaint of moderate to severe pain (> 3 on a 10-point numerical rating scale) and who were ultimately discharged home were eligible for study enrollment. Triage score, triage system, pain rating on arrival, and time of initial analgesic administration were recorded. Results: Among 842 enrolled subjects, 506 (60%) received an analgesic while in the ED. Lower-acuity patients consistently waited longer for analgesics. On multivariate modeling, presenting pain intensity, total time spent in the ED, white ethnicity, and triage system were associated with time to initial analgesic administration. Emergency departments using the Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale triage system exhibited the lowest rates of analgesic use and displayed longer median times to initial analgesic administration. Conclusions: Although there were some differences between triage systems, all sites and systems demonstrated unacceptably long times to analgesic provision. Many patients with moderate to severe pain received no analgesic during their ED stay. Future studies should examine whether ED overcrowding impacts timeliness of analgesic administration and identify specific strategies to improve pain management practices in this challenging environment. (c) 2008 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:867 / 873
页数:7
相关论文
共 16 条
[11]  
*PAIN MAN EM DEP, 2004, ANN EMERG MED, V44, P198
[12]   Undertreatment of acute pain in the emergency department: a challenge [J].
Stalnikowicz, R ;
Mahamid, R ;
Kaspi, S ;
Brezis, M .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR QUALITY IN HEALTH CARE, 2005, 17 (02) :173-176
[13]  
Tanabe P, 2001, J Emerg Nurs, V27, P124, DOI 10.1067/men.2001.114386
[14]   Emergency department management of acute pain episodes in sickle cell disease [J].
Tanabe, Paula ;
Myers, Randall ;
Zosel, Amy ;
Brice, Jane ;
Ansari, Altaf H. ;
Evans, Julia ;
Martinovich, Zoran ;
Todd, Knox H. ;
Paice, Judith A. .
ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2007, 14 (05) :419-425
[15]  
Tanabe Paula, 2002, J Emerg Nurs, V28, P118, DOI 10.1067/men.2002.122573
[16]  
TODD KH, 2007, J PAIN