How identity influences public attitudes towards the US federal government: lessons from the European Union

被引:0
作者
Williams, Christopher J. [1 ]
Shufeldt, Gregory [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Arkansas, Sch Publ Affairs, Little Rock, AR 72204 USA
[2] Butler Univ, Dept Polit Sci, Indianapolis, IN 46208 USA
关键词
Federalism; Multilevel government; Diffuse support; Racial politics; Ethnocentrism; European Union; RACIAL-ATTITUDES; POLITICAL RELEVANCE; PARTIES RESPOND; HEALTH-CARE; OPINION; SUPPORT; TRUST; PREFERENCES; AMERICANS; REPRESENTATION;
D O I
10.1057/s41269-020-00169-1
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
This study examines why Americans have positive or negative affect towards the US federal government. Specifically, it draws on existing theoretical and empirical research regarding individual attitudes towards the European Union, examining the effect of ethnocentrism on American attitudes towards the federal government. Relying on this existing research regarding the EU, it is hypothesized that those who are more ethnocentric will be more negative towards the US federal government. To test this expectation, we use longitudinal data from the American National Election Study from 1992 to 2012. We find those who are more ethnocentric are significantly more likely to possess negative attitudes towards the federal government. These findings have important implications for policymaking at both the federal and state levels, as well as party positioning both at the time of and between American elections, and the overall stability of multilevel governance in the United States. Additionally, the findings of this study indicate that theories designed to explain phenomena in the European Union are applicable to the US case.
引用
收藏
页码:21 / 51
页数:31
相关论文
共 112 条
[81]   Racism and xenophobia experienced by Polish migrants in the UK before and after Brexit vote [J].
Rzepnikowska, Alina .
JOURNAL OF ETHNIC AND MIGRATION STUDIES, 2019, 45 (01) :61-77
[82]  
Sanchez-Cuenca I., 2000, European Union Politics, V1, P147, DOI [DOI 10.1177/1465116500001002001, 10.1177/1465116500001002001]
[83]  
Schildkraut DeborahJ., 2010, AM 21 CENTURY PUBLIC
[84]   Is it really racism? The origins of white Americans opposition to race-targeted policies [J].
Sears, DO ;
VanLaar, C ;
Carrillo, M ;
Kosterman, R .
PUBLIC OPINION QUARTERLY, 1997, 61 (01) :16-53
[85]   Euroscepticism and the Global Financial Crisis [J].
Serricchio, Fabio ;
Tsakatika, Myrto ;
Quaglia, Lucia .
JCMS-JOURNAL OF COMMON MARKET STUDIES, 2013, 51 (01) :51-64
[86]  
Sides JohnMichael Tesler Lynn Vavreck., 2018, IDENTITY CRISIS 2016
[87]  
Silver N., 2020, POPULAR IS DONALD TR
[88]   Opinion representation and policy feedback: Canada in comparative perspective [J].
Soroka, SN ;
Wlezien, C .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE-REVUE CANADIENNE DE SCIENCE POLITIQUE, 2004, 37 (03) :531-559
[89]   It takes two: how Eurosceptic public opinion and party divisions influence party positions [J].
Spoon, Jae-Jae ;
Williams, Christopher .
WEST EUROPEAN POLITICS, 2017, 40 (04) :741-762
[90]   DYNAMIC REPRESENTATION [J].
STIMSON, JA ;
MACKUEN, MB ;
ERIKSON, RS .
AMERICAN POLITICAL SCIENCE REVIEW, 1995, 89 (03) :543-565