How identity influences public attitudes towards the US federal government: lessons from the European Union

被引:0
作者
Williams, Christopher J. [1 ]
Shufeldt, Gregory [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Arkansas, Sch Publ Affairs, Little Rock, AR 72204 USA
[2] Butler Univ, Dept Polit Sci, Indianapolis, IN 46208 USA
关键词
Federalism; Multilevel government; Diffuse support; Racial politics; Ethnocentrism; European Union; RACIAL-ATTITUDES; POLITICAL RELEVANCE; PARTIES RESPOND; HEALTH-CARE; OPINION; SUPPORT; TRUST; PREFERENCES; AMERICANS; REPRESENTATION;
D O I
10.1057/s41269-020-00169-1
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
This study examines why Americans have positive or negative affect towards the US federal government. Specifically, it draws on existing theoretical and empirical research regarding individual attitudes towards the European Union, examining the effect of ethnocentrism on American attitudes towards the federal government. Relying on this existing research regarding the EU, it is hypothesized that those who are more ethnocentric will be more negative towards the US federal government. To test this expectation, we use longitudinal data from the American National Election Study from 1992 to 2012. We find those who are more ethnocentric are significantly more likely to possess negative attitudes towards the federal government. These findings have important implications for policymaking at both the federal and state levels, as well as party positioning both at the time of and between American elections, and the overall stability of multilevel governance in the United States. Additionally, the findings of this study indicate that theories designed to explain phenomena in the European Union are applicable to the US case.
引用
收藏
页码:21 / 51
页数:31
相关论文
共 112 条
[1]  
Abanes Richard., 1996, American Militias: Rebellion, Racism, & Religion
[2]   Understanding change and stability in party ideologies: Do parties respond to public opinion or to past election results? [J].
Adams, J ;
Clark, M ;
Ezrow, L ;
Glasgow, G .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE, 2004, 34 :589-610
[3]   Are niche parties fundamentally different from mainstream parties? - The causes and the electoral consequences of Western European parties' policy shifts, 1976-1998 [J].
Adams, James ;
Clark, Michael ;
Ezrow, Lawrence ;
Glasgow, Garrett .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE, 2006, 50 (03) :513-529
[4]   When in doubt, use proxies - Attitudes toward domestic politics and support for European integration [J].
Anderson, CJ .
COMPARATIVE POLITICAL STUDIES, 1998, 31 (05) :569-601
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2015, What Do the People Want?
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2000, Racialized politics: The debate about racism in America
[7]  
Anthias F., 1983, FEMINIST REV, V15, P62, DOI [DOI 10.1057/FR.1983.33, DOI 10.2307/1394792]
[8]   Policy Coordination in Federal Systems: Comparing Intergovernmental Processes and Outcomes in Canada and the United States [J].
Bakvis, Herman ;
Brown, Douglas .
PUBLIUS-THE JOURNAL OF FEDERALISM, 2010, 40 (03) :484-507
[9]   The Public's Anger: White Racial Attitudes and Opinions Toward Health Care Reform [J].
Banks, Antoine J. .
POLITICAL BEHAVIOR, 2014, 36 (03) :493-514
[10]   Emotional Substrates of White Racial Attitudes [J].
Banks, Antoine J. ;
Valentino, Nicholas A. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE, 2012, 56 (02) :286-297