Impact of Preservation Method and 16S rRNA Hypervariable Region on Gut Microbiota Profiling

被引:108
作者
Chen, Zigui [1 ,2 ]
Hui, Pak Chun [2 ]
Hui, Mamie [1 ,2 ]
Yeoh, Yun Kit [1 ,2 ]
Wong, Po Yee [2 ]
Chan, Martin C. W. [2 ,3 ]
Wong, Martin C. S. [1 ]
Ng, Siew C. [1 ,4 ,5 ]
Chan, Francis K. L. [1 ,4 ]
Chan, Paul K. S. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Univ Hong Kong, Ctr Gut Microbiota Res, Fac Med, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[2] Chinese Univ Hong Kong, Dept Microbiol, Fac Med, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[3] Chinese Univ Hong Kong, Jockey Club Sch Publ Hlth & Primary Care, Fac Med, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[4] Chinese Univ Hong Kong, Dept Med & Therapeut, Fac Med, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[5] Chinese Univ Hong Kong, LKS Inst Hlth Sci, State Key Lab Digest Dis, Fac Med, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
关键词
16S rRNA gene; amplicon sequencing; bacterial culture; gut microbiota; preservative; FECAL SAMPLES; PHYLOGENETIC ANALYSIS; COLLECTION METHODS; DIVERSITY; COMMUNITY;
D O I
10.1128/mSystems.00271-18
中图分类号
Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 100705 ;
摘要
Proper preservation of stool samples to minimize microbial community shifts and inactivate infectious agents is important for self-collected specimens requiring shipment to laboratories when cold chain transport is not feasible. In this study, we evaluated the performance of six preservation solutions (Norgen, OMNI, RNAlater, CURNA, HEMA, and Shield) for these aspects. Following storage of human stool samples with these preservatives at room temperature for 7 days, three hypervariable regions of the bacterial 16S rRNA gene (V1-V2, V3-V4, and V4) were amplicon sequenced. We found that samples collected in two preservatives, Norgen and OMNI, showed the least shift in community composition relative to -80 degrees C standards compared with other storage conditions, and both efficiently inhibited the growth of aerobic and anaerobic bacteria. RNAlater did not prevent bacterial activity and exhibited relatively larger community shift. Although the effect of preservation solution was small compared to intersubject variation, notable changes in microbiota composition were observed, which could create biases in downstream data analysis. When community profiles inferred from different 16S rRNA gene hypervariable regions were compared, we found differential sensitivity of primer sets in identifying overall microbial community and certain bacterial taxa. For example, reads generated by the V4 primer pair showed a higher alpha diversity of the gut microbial community. The degenerate 27f-YM primer failed to detect the majority of Bifidobacteriales. Our data indicate that choice of preservation solution and 16S rRNA gene primer pair are critical determinants affecting gut microbiota profiling. IMPORTANCE Large-scale human microbiota studies require specimens collected from multiple sites and/or time points to maximize detection of the small effects in microbe-host interactions. However, batch biases caused by experimental protocols, such as sample collection, massively parallel sequencing, and bioinformatics analyses, remain critical and should be minimized. This work evaluated the effects of preservation solutions and bacterial 16S rRNA gene primer pairs in revealing human gut microbiota composition. Since notable changes in detecting bacterial composition and abundance were observed among choice of preservatives and primer pairs, a consistent methodology is essential in minimizing their effects to facilitate comparisons between data sets.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]   Common methods for fecal sample storage in field studies yield consistent signatures of individual identity in microbiome sequencing data [J].
Blekhman, Ran ;
Tang, Karen ;
Archie, Elizabeth A. ;
Barreiro, Luis B. ;
Johnson, Zachary P. ;
Wilson, Mark E. ;
Kohn, Jordan ;
Yuan, Michael L. ;
Gesquiere, Laurence ;
Grieneisen, Laura E. ;
Tung, Jenny .
SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2016, 6
[2]  
Bolyen E., 2018, PeerJ Inc, DOI DOI 10.7287/PEERJ.PREPRINTS.27295V2
[3]   Global patterns of 16S rRNA diversity at a depth of millions of sequences per sample [J].
Caporaso, J. Gregory ;
Lauber, Christian L. ;
Walters, William A. ;
Berg-Lyons, Donna ;
Lozupone, Catherine A. ;
Turnbaugh, Peter J. ;
Fierer, Noah ;
Knight, Rob .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2011, 108 :4516-4522
[4]   Sample storage conditions significantly influence faecal microbiome profiles [J].
Choo, Jocelyn M. ;
Leong, Lex E. X. ;
Rogers, Geraint B. .
SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2015, 5
[5]   Comparison of methods for fecal microbiome biospecimen collection [J].
Dominianni, Christine ;
Wu, Jing ;
Hayes, Richard B. ;
Ahn, Jiyoung .
BMC MICROBIOLOGY, 2014, 14
[6]   Techniques used to characterize the gut microbiota: a guide for the clinician [J].
Fraher, Marianne H. ;
O'Toole, Paul W. ;
Quigley, Eamonn M. M. .
NATURE REVIEWS GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY, 2012, 9 (06) :312-322
[7]   Critical evaluation of two primers commonly used for amplification of bacterial 16S rRNA genes [J].
Frank, Jeremy A. ;
Reich, Claudia I. ;
Sharma, Shobha ;
Weisbaum, Jon S. ;
Wilson, Brenda A. ;
Olsen, Gary J. .
APPLIED AND ENVIRONMENTAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2008, 74 (08) :2461-2470
[8]   Cancer and the microbiota [J].
Garrett, Wendy S. .
SCIENCE, 2015, 348 (6230) :80-86
[9]   The Earth Microbiome project: successes and aspirations [J].
Gilbert, Jack A. ;
Jansson, Janet K. ;
Knight, Rob .
BMC BIOLOGY, 2014, 12
[10]   Methods for Improving Human Gut Microbiome Data by Reducing Variability through Sample Processing and Storage of Stool [J].
Gorzelak, Monika A. ;
Gill, Sandeep K. ;
Tasnim, Nishat ;
Ahmadi-Vand, Zahra ;
Jay, Michael ;
Gibson, Deanna L. .
PLOS ONE, 2015, 10 (08)