Partisanship, Ministers, and Biotechnology Policy

被引:28
|
作者
Back, Hanna [1 ]
Debus, Marc [2 ]
Tosun, Jale [3 ]
机构
[1] Lund Univ, Dept Polit Sci, Lund, Sweden
[2] Univ Mannheim, Sch Social Sci, Mannheim, Germany
[3] Heidelberg Univ, Inst Polit Sci, D-69115 Heidelberg, Germany
关键词
biotechnology; cabinet portfolios; cultivation bans; European Union; genetically modified organisms; issue saliency; party competition; regulation; PARTIES MATTER; ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE; POLITICAL-PARTIES; GM PRODUCTS; GOVERNMENT; WESTERN; DETERMINANTS; INSTITUTIONS; RELIGION; SYSTEMS;
D O I
10.1111/ropr.12134
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
Research in public policy and political economy has provided many insights in the evolution of public resistance against genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in the last two decades. But how does the partisan composition of a government, its programmatic orientation and the allocation of cabinet offices affect policy making in this specific area? We argue that the regulation of GMOs is determined by the ideological orientation of governments and the presence of parties with a specific ideological background in the cabinet. In addition, we hypothesize that the parties' control over relevant cabinet posts matter for GMO regulation. We test our hypotheses by using an innovative dataset that contains information on biotechnology regulation outputs of European governments in the time period from 1996 until 2013, the partisan composition and policy-area specific positions of governments, and the party affiliation of key cabinet actors. The results show that the presence of a Christian democratic party in a cabinet increases the chances of a ban on biotech crops, in particular if it controls the Ministry of the Environment.
引用
收藏
页码:556 / 575
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The Partisanship of Ministers in the Formation of Cabinets in Colombia
    Guinand, Luis Bernardo Mejia
    Rodriguez-Raga, Juan Carlos
    Daza, Santiago Giraldo
    COLOMBIA INTERNACIONAL, 2024, 120 : 51 - 80
  • [2] Mayoral Partisanship and Municipal Fiscal Policy
    de Benedictis-Kessner, Justin
    Warshaw, Christopher
    JOURNAL OF POLITICS, 2016, 78 (04): : 1124 - 1138
  • [3] Assessment of factors affecting innovation policy in biotechnology
    Aghmiuni, Samira Khodi
    Siyal, Saeed
    Wang, Qiang
    Duan, Yuzhen
    JOURNAL OF INNOVATION & KNOWLEDGE, 2020, 5 (03): : 179 - 189
  • [4] Religion, Partisanship, and Attitudes Toward Science Policy
    Jelen, Ted G.
    Lockett, Linda A.
    SAGE OPEN, 2014, 4 (01):
  • [5] Citizen Partisanship, Local Government, and Environmental Policy Implementation
    Switzer, David
    URBAN AFFAIRS REVIEW, 2019, 55 (03) : 675 - 702
  • [6] Pathways to policy: Partisanship and bipartisanship in renewable energy legislation
    Brown, Kate Pride
    Hess, David J.
    ENVIRONMENTAL POLITICS, 2016, 25 (06) : 971 - 990
  • [7] Political advisers in Portugal: Partisanship and loyalty in policy processes
    Silva, Patricia
    PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION, 2017, 95 (02) : 378 - 392
  • [8] Multidimensional partisanship shapes climate policy support and behaviours
    Mayer, Adam P.
    Smith, E. Keith
    NATURE CLIMATE CHANGE, 2023, 13 (01) : 32 - +
  • [9] What parties are and what parties do: partisanship and welfare state reform in an era of austerity
    Finseraas, Henning
    Vernby, Kare
    SOCIO-ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2011, 9 (04) : 613 - 638
  • [10] Party politics and the shaping of migration policy in the Council of Ministers
    Fink, Simon
    EUROPEAN POLICY ANALYSIS, 2024, 10 (01) : 128 - 151