Benchmark dose profiles for joint-action continuous data in quantitative risk assessment

被引:6
作者
Deutsch, Roland C. [1 ]
Piegorsch, Walter W. [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ N Carolina, Dept Math & Stat, Greensboro, NC 27402 USA
[2] Univ Arizona, Interdisciplinary Program Stat, Tucson, AZ 85721 USA
[3] Univ Arizona, Inst BIO5, Tucson, AZ 85721 USA
关键词
Benchmark analysis; Benchmark dose approach; Benchmark profile; Joint-action model; Nonquantal data; Risk analysis; QUANTAL RESPONSE DATA; MULTIPLICITY-ADJUSTED INFERENCES; COMPOUND EXPOSURE; CONFIDENCE BANDS; MIXTURES; CARCINOGENS; OUTCOMES; MODEL;
D O I
10.1002/bimj.201300037
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Benchmark analysis is a widely used tool in biomedical and environmental risk assessment. Therein, estimation of minimum exposure levels, called benchmark doses (BMDs), that induce a prespecified benchmark response (BMR) is well understood for the case of an adverse response to a single stimulus. For cases where two agents are studied in tandem, however, the benchmark approach is far less developed. This paper demonstrates how the benchmark modeling paradigm can be expanded from the single-agent setting to joint-action, two-agent studies. Focus is on continuous response outcomes. Extending the single-exposure setting, representations of risk are based on a joint-action dose-response model involving both agents. Based on such a model, the concept of a benchmark profilea two-dimensional analog of the single-dose BMD at which both agents achieve the specified BMRis defined for use in quantitative risk characterization and assessment.
引用
收藏
页码:741 / 754
页数:14
相关论文
共 55 条
[1]   Confidence bands for low-dose risk estimation with quantal response data [J].
Al-Saidy, OM ;
Piegorsch, WW ;
West, RW ;
Nitcheva, DK .
BIOMETRICS, 2003, 59 (04) :1056-1062
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2012, R LANG ENV STAT COMP
[3]   JOINT RISK FROM MULTIPLE COMPOUND EXPOSURE [J].
AUTON, TR .
RISK ANALYSIS, 1991, 11 (02) :181-183
[4]   Continuous dose-response modeling and risk analysis with the gamma and reciprocal gamma distributions [J].
Banga, S ;
Patil, GP ;
Taillie, C .
ENVIRONMENTAL AND ECOLOGICAL STATISTICS, 2002, 9 (03) :273-293
[5]  
Barlow S, 2009, EFSA J, V1150, P1
[6]   AN ANALYSIS OF TRANSFORMATIONS [J].
BOX, GEP ;
COX, DR .
JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY SERIES B-STATISTICAL METHODOLOGY, 1964, 26 (02) :211-252
[7]   Power and sample size calculations for linear hypotheses associated with mixtures of many components using fixed-ratio ray designs [J].
Casey, M ;
Gennings, C ;
Carter, WH ;
Moser, VC ;
Simmons, JE .
ENVIRONMENTAL AND ECOLOGICAL STATISTICS, 2006, 13 (01) :11-23
[8]   ESTIMATION OF THE JOINT RISK FROM MULTIPLE-COMPOUND EXPOSURE BASED ON SINGLE-COMPOUND EXPERIMENTS [J].
CHEN, JJ ;
GAYLOR, DW ;
KODELL, RL .
RISK ANALYSIS, 1990, 10 (02) :285-290
[9]   ASYMPTOTIC CONFIDENCE BANDS FOR GENERALIZED NONLINEAR-REGRESSION MODELS [J].
COX, C ;
MA, GQ .
BIOMETRICS, 1995, 51 (01) :142-150
[10]  
Crump K. S., 2008, ENCY QUANTITATIVE RI, V1, P145