How to Determine the Upper Level of Instrumentation in Lenke Types 1 and 2 Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis A Prospective Study of 132 Patients

Background: The selection of fusion levels continues to be controversial in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). The classifications of King and Lenke remain the most widely used, but recent studies have demonstrated their shortcomings, including poor interobserver reproducibility. We propose a method of preoperative planning that is independent of anatomical classifications, based on the anticipated effect of curve reduction. The objectives of this preoperative strategy are ( 1) to achieve satisfactory T1 tilt and shoulder balance and ( 2) to restore balance in the coronal and sagittal planes. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the results of our strategy of deciding the proximal level of arthrodesis in Lenke types 1 and 2 AIS. Methods: We included 132 adolescents operated on for thoracic AIS by posterior instrumentation. The choice of the proximal fusion level was based on preoperative analysis of the rigidity of the proximal curvature, T1 tilt, and shoulder balance. The preoperative, postoperative, and last follow-up radiographs were digitized then analyzed using computer software. Radiological parameters were compared using paired t tests. Results: Average age at the time of surgery was 15.2 years (SD, 1.7 years). Mean follow-up was 30.2 months. The clavicle angle and T1 tilt were significantly improved in both Lenke types 1 and 2 curves. No correlation was found between T1 tilt and shoulder balance. At last follow-up, 89% of the patients satisfied all criteria for balance. Conclusions: The results of the present preoperative strategy, to which we adhered in 97% of cases, are encouraging and show that the systematic instrumentation of the entire proximal curvature is not justified in Lenke type 2 curves. However, long-term consequences of the residual T1 tilt need to be studied further. Level of evidence: therapeutic level IV.