Vector-IM-based assessment of alternative framing systems under bi-directional ground-motion

被引:28
|
作者
Malaga-Chuquitaype, C. [1 ]
Bougatsas, K. [1 ]
机构
[1] Imperial Coll London, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, London, England
关键词
Steel framing systems; Bi-directional seismic loads; 3D steel frames; Seismic fragilities; Performance-based seismic design; Vector-valued seismic assessment; INELASTIC SEISMIC RESPONSE; SPECTRAL ACCELERATION; INTENSITY MEASURES; STEEL STRUCTURES; ONE-WAY; FRAMES; COLLAPSE; DEMANDS; BUILDINGS; PERFORMANCE;
D O I
10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.11.021
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
This paper examines the seismic performance of steel buildings with alternative framing systems subjected to bi-directional ground-motion. Peak drifts of one-way (perimeter framing) and two-way (space framing) systems are assessed by means of scalar and vector-valued probabilistic methods. Extensive non-linear response history analyses over idealized 3D structures representing 6- and 9-storey buildings are performed under pairs of linearly scaled ground-motions. Both far-field and near-field non-pulselike acceleration series are considered. The spectral acceleration of the geometric mean of the two horizontal components (S-a,S-GM) is taken as the primary intensity measure (IM) while four other ground-motion parameters are employed to construct IM-vectors including: the spectral acceleration ratio (R-T3,R-T1), the spectral shape parameter (N-p), and two frequency content parameters (T-m and T-0). This paper shows that incorporating the vector < S-a,S-GM, N-p > into the assessment of bi-directionally loaded 3D buildings yields up to 40% lower conditional standard deviations than a purely scalar formulation at large drift levels while the vector < S-a,S-GM,R-T3,T-1 > is more efficient at smaller drifts. The effects of alternative framing systems on structural fragilities are found to differ depending on the number of storeys. For 6-storey structures, consistently higher capacities are observed in two-way layouts with respect to one-way systems but they are associated with increasing variabilities at larger demand levels. Conversely, the 9-storey two-way building experiences 5% lower mean capacities than its one-way counterpart. Finally, drift hazard curves are calculated by combining the building fragilities with idealized ground-motion hazard estimates. The results indicate that one-way buildings experience consistently lower drift exceedance rates regardless of the ground-motion type, especially for drift levels larger than 2% although the differences are larger for the 9-storey frames in comparison with their 6-storey counterparts. This study represents a first attempt to implement vector-valued analysis in the context of bi-directionally loaded structures and its results constitute an important step towards discerning the most favourable framing system at different seismic performance levels. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:188 / 204
页数:17
相关论文
共 10 条
  • [1] Noisy Motion Vector Elimination by Bi-directional Vector-Based Zero Comparison
    Yokoyama, Takanori
    Watanabe, Toshinori
    COMPUTER VISION - ACCV 2010 WORKSHOPS, PT I, 2011, 6468 : 104 - 112
  • [2] Dynamic Magnification Factor of Pile-Supported Wharf under Horizontally Bi-Directional Ground Motion
    Gao, Shufei
    Gong, Jinxin
    Feng, Yunfen
    JOURNAL OF EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING, 2021, 25 (01) : 139 - 161
  • [3] Inelastic seismic behavior of soil-pile raft-structure system under bi-directional ground motion
    Dutta, Sekhar Chandra
    Saha, Rajib
    Haldar, Sumanta
    SOIL DYNAMICS AND EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING, 2014, 67 : 133 - 157
  • [4] Seismic analysis of two-way asymmetric building systems under bi-directional seismic ground motions
    Lin, Jui-Liang
    Tsai, Keh-Chyuan
    EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING & STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS, 2008, 37 (02): : 305 - 328
  • [5] Inelastic seismic response of one-way plan-asymmetric systems under bi-directional ground motions
    De Stafano, M.
    Faella, G.
    Ramasco, R.
    Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 1998, 27 (04): : 363 - 376
  • [6] Inelastic seismic response of one-way plan-asymmetric systems under bi-directional ground motions
    De Stefano, M
    Faella, G
    Ramasco, R
    EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING & STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS, 1998, 27 (04): : 363 - 376
  • [7] Prediction of the "Average" Peak Nonlinear Seismic Response of Asymmetric Buildings Under Bi-directional Ground Motion Acting at an Arbitrary Angle of Incidence
    Fujii, Kenji
    SEISMIC BEHAVIOUR AND DESIGN OF IRREGULAR AND COMPLEX CIVIL STRUCTURES II, 2016, 40 : 13 - 23
  • [8] Prediction of peak seismic response of asymmetric buildings under bi-directional horizontal ground motion using equivalent SDOF model and its applicability
    Fujii, Kenji
    Journal of Structural and Construction Engineering, 2014, 79 (706): : 1783 - 1793
  • [9] Seismic response of three-dimensional r/c multi-storey frame building under uni- and bi-directional input ground motion
    Magliulo, Gennaro
    Ramasco, Roberto
    EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING & STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS, 2007, 36 (12): : 1641 - 1657
  • [10] Response- and probability-based evaluation of spectrally matched ground motion selection strategies for bi-directional dynamic analysis of low- to mid-rise RC buildings
    Demir, Ahmet
    Kayhan, Ali Haydar
    Palanci, Mehmet
    STRUCTURES, 2023, 58