Religious Pluralisms: From Homogenization to Radicality

被引:4
作者
Burley, Mikel [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Leeds, Sch Philosophy Relig & Hist Sci, Leeds LS2 9JT, W Yorkshire, England
关键词
Religious diversity; Religious pluralism; John Hick; John Cobb; D; Z; Phillips; Radical pluralism; Contemplative philosophy of religion; INTERNAL REALISM; SANKARA;
D O I
10.1007/s11841-017-0636-3
中图分类号
B [哲学、宗教];
学科分类号
01 ; 0101 ;
摘要
Among the philosophical and theological responses to the phenomenon of religious diversity, religious pluralism has been both prominent and influential. Of its various proponents, John Hick and John Cobb represent two important figures whose respective positions, especially that of Hick, have done much to shape the debate over religious pluralism. This article critically analyses their positions, arguing that, by unhelpfully homogenizing religious perspectives, each of them fails to do justice to the radical diversity that exists. As an alternative to these homogenizing tendencies, the article builds upon D. Z. Phillips' contemplative conception of philosophy to develop a radical pluralist approach, which prioritizes a deepening of understanding of religious diversity rather than the promotion of one's own theological preferences.
引用
收藏
页码:311 / 331
页数:21
相关论文
共 76 条
[1]  
Almond PhilipC., 1988, BRIT DISCOVERY BUDDH
[2]  
Appleton N., 2015, 10 GREAT BIRTH STORI, V2
[3]  
Armstrong K., 2010, The case for God: What religion really means
[4]  
BIDERMAN S, 1978, J INDIAN PHILOS, V6, P405
[8]  
Burley Mikel., 2012, Contemplating Religious Forms of Life: Wittgenstein and D.Z. Phillips
[9]  
Carrin M, 2012, BRILLS ENCY HINDUISM, P588
[10]  
Cobb J.B., 1990, Christian Uniqueness Reconsidered: Tlw Myth of a Pluralistic Theology of Religions, P81, DOI DOI 10.1017/S0036930600046044