The Smc complexes in DNA damage response

被引:93
作者
Wu, Nan [1 ]
Yu, Hongtao [1 ]
机构
[1] Howard Hughes Med Inst, Dept Pharmacol, Dallas, TX 75390 USA
来源
CELL AND BIOSCIENCE | 2012年 / 2卷
关键词
Cohesin; Condensin; Smc5; Smc6; homologous recombination; DNA repair; DNA damage checkpoint; rDNA; SUMO; SISTER-CHROMATID COHESION; DOUBLE-STRAND-BREAK; S-PHASE CHECKPOINT; PROTEIN PHOSPHATASE 2A; HOMOLOGOUS RECOMBINATION; SMC5-SMC6; COMPLEX; SCHIZOSACCHAROMYCES-POMBE; STRUCTURAL MAINTENANCE; IONIZING-RADIATION; REPLICATION FORKS;
D O I
10.1186/2045-3701-2-5
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
The structural maintenance of chromosomes (Smc) proteins regulate nearly all aspects of chromosome biology and are critical for genomic stability. In eukaryotes, six Smc proteins form three heterodimers-Smc1/3, Smc2/4, and Smc5/6-which together with non-Smc proteins form cohesin, condensin, and the Smc5/6 complex, respectively. Cohesin is required for proper chromosome segregation. It establishes and maintains sister-chromatid cohesion until all sister chromatids achieve bipolar attachment to the mitotic spindle. Condensin mediates chromosome condensation during mitosis. The Smc5/6 complex has multiple roles in DNA repair. In addition to their major functions in chromosome cohesion and condensation, cohesin and condensin also participate in the cellular DNA damage response. Here we review recent progress on the functions of all three Smc complexes in DNA repair and their cell cycle regulation by posttranslational modifications, such as acetylation, phosphorylation, and sumoylation. An in-depth understanding of the mechanisms by which these complexes promote DNA repair and genomic stability may help us to uncover the molecular basis of genomic instability in human cancers and devise ways that exploit this instability to treat cancers.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Alternative Splicing and DNA Damage Response in Plants
    Nimeth, Barbara Anna
    Riegler, Stefan
    Kalyna, Maria
    FRONTIERS IN PLANT SCIENCE, 2020, 11
  • [42] The role of arginine methylation in the DNA damage response
    Auclair, Yannick
    Richard, Stephane
    DNA REPAIR, 2013, 12 (07) : 459 - 465
  • [43] RAD54 forms DNA repair foci in response to DNA damage in living plant cells
    Hirakawa, Takeshi
    Hasegawa, Junko
    White, Charles I.
    Matsunaga, Sachihiro
    PLANT JOURNAL, 2017, 90 (02) : 372 - 382
  • [44] Targeting DNA damage response in cancer therapy
    Hosoya, Noriko
    Miyagawa, Kiyoshi
    CANCER SCIENCE, 2014, 105 (04) : 370 - 388
  • [45] Targeting the DNA damage response for cancer therapy
    Powell, Simon N.
    Bindra, Ranjit S.
    DNA REPAIR, 2009, 8 (09) : 1153 - 1165
  • [46] Targeting the DNA damage response for cancer therapy
    Wang, Ruoxi
    Sun, Yating
    Li, Chunshuang
    Xue, Yaoyao
    Ba, Xueqing
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR SCIENCES, 2023, 24 (21)
  • [47] The bacterial chromosome: architecture and action of bacterial SMC and SMC-like complexes
    Nolivos, Sophie
    Sherratt, David
    FEMS MICROBIOLOGY REVIEWS, 2014, 38 (03) : 380 - 392
  • [48] The p53-inducible gene 3 (PIG3) contributes to early cellular response to DNA damage
    Lee, J-H
    Kang, Y.
    Khare, V.
    Jin, Z-Y
    Kang, M-Y
    Yoon, Y.
    Hyun, J-W
    Chung, M-H
    Cho, S-I
    Jun, J. Y.
    Chang, I-Y
    You, H. J.
    ONCOGENE, 2010, 29 (10) : 1431 - 1450
  • [49] Roles of homologous recombination in response to ionizing radiation-induced DNA damage
    Nickoloff, Jac A.
    Sharma, Neelam
    Allen, Christopher P.
    Taylor, Lynn
    Allen, Sage J.
    Jaiswal, Aruna S.
    Hromas, Robert
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION BIOLOGY, 2023, 99 (06) : 903 - 914
  • [50] Role of H2AX in DNA damage response and human cancers
    Srivastava, Niloo
    Gochhait, Sailesh
    de Boer, Peter
    Bamezai, Rameshwar N. K.
    MUTATION RESEARCH-REVIEWS IN MUTATION RESEARCH, 2009, 681 (2-3) : 180 - 188