Compliance with biodiversity compensation on New Zealand's public conservation lands

被引:2
作者
Brower, Ann [1 ]
Heijs, Laurien [1 ]
Kimani, Ruth [1 ]
Ross, James [1 ]
Doscher, Crile [1 ]
机构
[1] Lincoln Univ, Dept Environm Management, POB 84, Canterbury 7647, New Zealand
来源
NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF ECOLOGY | 2018年 / 42卷 / 01期
关键词
biodiversity compensation; compliance; concession; Conservation Act; Department of Conservation; enforcement; implementation; monitoring; New Zealand; policy; NO NET LOSS; ECOLOGICAL COMPENSATION; HABITAT COMPENSATION; OFFSET POLICIES; MITIGATION; PERFORMANCE; ENFORCEMENT; BANKING; SUCCESS; CANADA;
D O I
10.20417/nzjecol.42.4
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
This article assesses compliance with biodiversity compensation on New Zealand's conservation land. Of the 261 Department of Conservation (DOC) concessions for commercial activity searched, only about 15% included compensation provisions. A sample of 20 concessions of that 15% suggests 68% achieve full compliance. Our results suggest compliance is influenced by factors such as habitat and activity type, protected area category, and whether a concession holder has pending concessions and/or renewals. Inconsistencies in compliance monitoring, enforcement, and reporting merit attention. Although New Zealand's rate of full compliance with biodiversity compensation conditions is higher than that observed in other countries, compensation is rarely requested. This rarity and the lack of national guidelines on how and what to ask for in compensation, suggest that compliance with compensation once requested, and the quality and consistency of requests, limit biodiversity protection. Jurisdictions engaging in biodiversity compensation should attend not just to compliance, but also to the requests themselves. To do so, they should develop clear guidelines, enforcement strategies, and reporting processes.
引用
收藏
页码:11 / 17
页数:7
相关论文
共 42 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2000, NZ BIOD STRAT 2000 2
[2]  
[Anonymous], WHO OWNS HIGH COUNTR
[3]   ENVIRONMENTAL AUDITING - ARTIFICIAL WATERWAY DEVELOPMENTS IN WESTERN-AUSTRALIA [J].
BAILEY, J ;
HOBBS, V ;
SAUNDERS, A .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 1992, 34 (01) :1-13
[4]   The biodiversity bank cannot be a lending bank [J].
Bekessy, Sarah A. ;
Wintle, Brendan A. ;
Lindenmayer, David B. ;
Mccarthy, Michael A. ;
Colyvan, Mark ;
Burgman, Mark A. ;
Possingham, Hugh P. .
CONSERVATION LETTERS, 2010, 3 (03) :151-158
[5]  
Binning C, 2000, 0026 CSIRO WILDL EC
[6]   Wetland ecological and compliance assessments in the San Francisco bay region, california, USA [J].
Breaux, A ;
Cochrane, S ;
Evens, J ;
Martindale, M ;
Pavlik, B ;
Suer, L ;
Benner, D .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2005, 74 (03) :217-237
[7]  
Brown MA, 2017, LAST LINE OF DEFENCE
[8]   Ecological compensation: an evaluation of regulatory compliance in New Zealand [J].
Brown, Marie A. ;
Clarkson, Bruce D. ;
Barton, Barry J. ;
Joshi, Chaitanya .
IMPACT ASSESSMENT AND PROJECT APPRAISAL, 2013, 31 (01) :34-44
[9]  
Brown SC, 2001, WETLANDS, V21, P508, DOI 10.1672/0277-5212(2001)021[0508:EOCWMI]2.0.CO
[10]  
2