Comparison of amide proton transfer imaging and magnetization transfer imaging in revealing glioma grades and proliferative activities: a histogram analysis

被引:6
|
作者
Su, Changliang [1 ]
Jiang, Jingjing [2 ]
Liu, Chengxia [2 ]
Shi, JingJing [2 ]
Li, Shihui [2 ]
Chen, Xiaowei [3 ]
Ao, Qilin [4 ]
机构
[1] Sun Yat Sen Univ Canc Ctr, State Key Lab Oncol South China, Collaborat Innovat Ctr Canc Med, Guangzhou 510060, Peoples R China
[2] Huazhong Univ Sci & Technol, Tongji Hosp, Tongji Med Coll, Dept Radiol, 1095 JieFang Ave, Wuhan 430030, Peoples R China
[3] Huazhong Univ Sci & Technol, Tongji Med Coll, Cent Hosp Wuhan, Wuhan, Peoples R China
[4] Huazhong Univ Sci & Technol, Tongji Med Coll, Tongji Hosp, Dept Pathol, 1095 JieFang Ave, Wuhan 430030, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Magnetic resonance imaging; Amide proton transfer imaging; Magnetization transfer imaging; Tumor grading; Tumor proliferation; BRAIN; TUMORS; MRI; DIFFERENTIATION; CONTRAST;
D O I
10.1007/s00234-020-02547-0
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose Comprehensive understanding glioma metabolic characters is of great help for patient management. We aimed to compare amide proton transfer imaging (APTw) and magnetization transfer imaging (MT) in predicting glioma malignancy and reflecting tumor proliferation. Methods Thirty low-grade gliomas (LGGs) and 39 high-grade gliomas (HGGs) were prospectively included, of which 58 samples Ki-67 levels were quantified. Anatomical MRI, APTw, and MT were scanned, and magnetization transfer ratio (MTR) and asymmetric magnetic transfer ratio at 3.5 ppm (MTRasym(3.5ppm)) were calculated. ROIs were semi-automatically drawn with ImageJ, from which histogram features, including 5th, 25th, 50th, mean, 70th, 90th, and 95th percentiles were extracted. The independentttest was used to test differences in LGGs and HGGs, and correlations between histogram features and tumor grades, Ki-67 were revealed by Spearman's rank or Pearson's correlation analysis. Results The maximum correlation coefficient (R) values of APTw were 0.526 (p< 0.001) with tumor grades and 0.397 (p< 0.001) with Ki-67 at 90th percentiles, while only 5th and 25th percentiles of MT significantly correlated with tumor grades. Moreover, APTw features were significantly different in LGGs and HGGs, except 5th percentile. The most significantly different feature was 95th percentile, providing the excellent AUC of 0.808. However, the best feature in MTR was 5th percentiles with AUC of 0.703. Combing 5th and 95th of APTw achieved highest AUC Of 0.837. Conclusions Both APTw and MT provide quantitative information for tumor metabolite imaging. However, APTw supplys more specific information in reflecting glioma biological behaviors than MT, and well differentiates glioma malignancy.
引用
收藏
页码:685 / 693
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Comparison of Diffusion Kurtosis Imaging and Amide Proton Transfer Imaging in the Diagnosis and Risk Assessment of Prostate Cancer
    Yin, Huijia
    Wang, Dongdong
    Yan, Ruifang
    Jin, Xingxing
    Hu, Ying
    Zhai, Zhansheng
    Duan, Jinhui
    Zhang, Jian
    Wang, Kaiyu
    Han, Dongming
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2021, 11
  • [22] A new approach for imaging brain tumors: Amide proton transfer (APT) imaging
    Blakeley, Jaishri O.
    Van Zijl, Peter
    Pomper, Martin G.
    Jones, Craig
    Laterra, John
    Zhou, Jinyuan
    NEUROLOGY, 2007, 68 (12) : A288 - A288
  • [23] Editorial for "Amide Proton Transfer-Weighted Imaging in Assessing the Aggressive and Proliferative Potential of Bladder Cancer"
    Li, Jianqi
    JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2025, 61 (02) : 713 - 714
  • [24] Amide proton transfer imaging for differentiation of benign and atypical meningiomas
    Joo, Bio
    Han, Kyunghwa
    Choi, Yoon Seong
    Lee, Seung-Koo
    Ahn, Sung Soo
    Chang, Jong Hee
    Kang, Seok-Gu
    Kim, Se Hoon
    Zhou, Jinyuan
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2018, 28 (01) : 331 - 339
  • [25] Amide proton transfer imaging for differentiation of benign and atypical meningiomas
    Bio Joo
    Kyunghwa Han
    Yoon Seong Choi
    Seung-Koo Lee
    Sung Soo Ahn
    Jong Hee Chang
    Seok-Gu Kang
    Se Hoon Kim
    Jinyuan Zhou
    European Radiology, 2018, 28 : 331 - 339
  • [26] Amide proton transfer (APT) contrast for imaging of brain tumors
    Zhou, JY
    Lal, B
    Wilson, DA
    Laterra, J
    van Zijl, PCM
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 2003, 50 (06) : 1120 - 1126
  • [27] Amide Proton Transfer Imaging of Cavernous Malformation in the Cavernous Sinus
    Bohara, Manisha
    Kamimura, Kiyohisa
    Nakajo, Masanori
    Yoneyama, Tomohide
    Yoshiura, Takashi
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2019, 18 (02) : 109 - 110
  • [28] Quantitative amide proton transfer imaging with reduced interferences from magnetization transfer asymmetry for human brain tumors at 3T
    Zhao, Xuna
    Wen, Zhibo
    Li, Chunmei
    Chen, Min
    Wang, Yi
    Gao, Jia-Hong
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 2015, 74 (01) : 208 - 216
  • [29] Differentiation between glioma recurrence and treatment effects using amide proton transfer imaging: A miniBayesian bivariate meta-analysis
    Chen, Kai
    Jiang, Xi-Wen
    Deng, Li-jing
    She, Hua-Long
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2022, 12
  • [30] Amide proton transfer (APT) magnetic resonance imaging of prostate cancer: comparison with Gleason scores
    Takayama, Yukihisa
    Nishie, Akihiro
    Sugimoto, Masaaki
    Togao, Osamu
    Asayama, Yoshiki
    Ishigami, Kousei
    Ushijima, Yasuhiro
    Okamoto, Daisuke
    Fujita, Nobuhiro
    Yokomizo, Akira
    Keupp, Jochen
    Honda, Hiroshi
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE MATERIALS IN PHYSICS BIOLOGY AND MEDICINE, 2016, 29 (04) : 671 - 679