Effectiveness of Health Impact Assessments: A Synthesis of Data From Five Impact Evaluation Reports

被引:39
作者
Dannenberg, Andrew L. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Washington, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Environm & Occupat Hlth Sci, Box 357234, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
来源
PREVENTING CHRONIC DISEASE | 2016年 / 13卷
关键词
LIVING WAGE ORDINANCE; NEW-ZEALAND; 2005-2009; DECISION-MAKING; UNITED-STATES; AUSTRALIA; FRAMEWORK; STRATEGY; POLICIES; CITIES; CITY;
D O I
10.5888/pcd13.150559
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Introduction Since the 1990s, the use of health impact assessments (HIAs) has grown for considering the potential health impacts of proposed policies, plans, programs, and projects in various sectors. Evaluation of HIA impacts is needed for understanding the value of HIAs, improving the methods involved in HIAs, and potentially expanding their application. Impact evaluations examine whether HIAs affect decisions and lead to other effects. Methods I reviewed HIA impact evaluations identified by literature review and professional networking. I abstracted and synthesized data on key findings, success factors, and challenges from 5 large evaluations conducted in the United States, Europe, Australia, and New Zealand and published from 2006 through 2015. These studies analyzed impacts of approximately 200 individual HIAs. Results Major impacts of HIAs were directly influencing some decisions, improving collaboration among stakeholders, increasing awareness of health issues among decision makers, and giving community members a stronger voice in local decisions. Factors that contributed to successful HIAs included engaging stakeholders, timeliness, policy and systems support for conducting HIAs, having people with appropriate skills on the HIA team, obtaining the support of decision makers, and providing clearly articulated, feasible recommendations. Challenges that may have reduced HIA success were poor timeliness, underestimation of time and re-sources needed, difficulty in accessing relevant data, use of jargon in HIA reports, difficulty in involving decision makers in the HIA process, and absence of a requirement to conduct HIAs. Conclusion HIAs can be useful to promote health and mitigate adverse impacts of decisions made outside of the health sector. Stakeholder interactions and community engagement may be as important as direct impacts of HIAs. Multiple factors are required for HIA success. Further work could strengthen the role of HIAs in promoting equity, examine HIA impacts in specific sectors, and document the role of HIAs in a "health in all policies" approach.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 65 条
  • [1] Enabling factors and barriers for the use of health impact assessment in decision-making processes
    Ahmad, B.
    Chappel, D.
    Pless-Mulloli, T.
    White, M.
    [J]. PUBLIC HEALTH, 2008, 122 (05) : 452 - 457
  • [2] Ali S., 2009, Critical Public Health, V19, P171, DOI 10.1080/09581590802392777
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2010, MINIMUM ELEMENTS PRA
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2013, INTEGRATING HLTH IMP
  • [5] Estimation of health benefits from a local living wage ordinance
    Bhatia, R
    Katz, M
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2001, 91 (09) : 1398 - 1402
  • [6] Bhatia R., 2010, Minimum Elements and Practice Standards for Health Impact Assessment, Version 2
  • [7] Integrating human health into environmental impact assessment: An unrealized opportunity for environmental health and justice
    Bhatia, Rajiv
    Wernham, Aaron
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH PERSPECTIVES, 2008, 116 (08) : 991 - 1000
  • [8] Protecting health using an environmental impact assessment: A case study of San Francisco land use decisionmaking
    Bhatia, Rajiv
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2007, 97 (03) : 406 - 413
  • [9] Birley M., 2011, Health impact assessment principles and practice
  • [10] An Evaluation of Health Impact Assessments in the United States, 2011-2014
    Bourcier, Emily
    Charbonneau, Diana
    Cahill, Carol
    Dannenberg, Andrew L.
    [J]. PREVENTING CHRONIC DISEASE, 2015, 12