Influential Factors Regarding Carbon Emission Intensity in China: A Spatial Econometric Analysis from a Provincial Perspective

被引:15
作者
Xue, Li-Ming [1 ]
Meng, Shuo [1 ]
Wang, Jia-Xing [1 ]
Liu, Lei [1 ]
Zheng, Zhi-Xue [2 ]
机构
[1] China Univ Min & Technol Beijing CUMTB, Fac Energy & Min, Beijing 100083, Peoples R China
[2] Peking Univ, Coll Engn, Beijing 100871, Peoples R China
关键词
carbon emission intensity; spatial econometrics; panel data; spatial Durbin model; regional cooperation; China; PANEL-DATA ANALYSIS; CO2; EMISSIONS; STRUCTURAL DECOMPOSITION; ECONOMIC-GROWTH; ENERGY; REDUCTION; EFFICIENCY; MECHANISM; POLLUTION; INDUSTRY;
D O I
10.3390/su12198097
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Emission reduction strategies based on provinces are key for China to mitigate its carbon emission intensity (CEI). As such, it is valuable to analyze the driving mechanism of CEI from a provincial view, and to explore a coordinated emission mitigation mechanism. Based on spatial econometrics, this study conducts a spatial-temporal effect analysis on CEI, and constructs a Spatial Durbin Model on the Panel data (SDPM) of CEI and its eight influential factors: GDP, urbanization rate (URB), industrial structure (INS), energy structure (ENS), energy intensity (ENI), technological innovation (TEL), openness level (OPL), and foreign direct investment (FDI). The main findings are as follows: (1) overall, there is a significant and upward trend of the spatial autocorrelation of CEI on 30 provinces in China. (2) The spatial spillover effect of CEI is positive, with a coefficient of 0.083. (3) The direct effects of ENI, ENS and TEL are significantly positive in descending order, while INS and GDP are significantly negative. The indirect effects of URB and ENS are significantly positive, while GDP, ENI, OPL and FDI are significantly negative in descending order. Economic and energy-related emission reduction measures are still crucial to the achievement of CEI reduction targets for provinces in China.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 26
页数:26
相关论文
共 55 条
[1]   A semi-parametric panel data analysis on the urbanisation-carbon emissions nexus for the MENA countries [J].
Abdallh, Atif Awad ;
Abugamos, Hoda .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2017, 78 :1350-1356
[2]   Modelling carbon emission intensity: Application of artificial neural network [J].
Acheampong, Alex O. ;
Boateng, Emmanuel B. .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2019, 225 :833-856
[3]   Carbon emissions, energy consumption and economic growth: An aggregate and disaggregate analysis of the Indian economy [J].
Ahmad, Ashfaq ;
Zhao, Yuhuan ;
Shahbaz, Muhammad ;
Bano, Sadia ;
Zhang, Zhonghua ;
Wang, Song ;
Liu, Ya .
ENERGY POLICY, 2016, 96 :131-143
[4]   Relevance of Carbon Capture & Sequestration in India's Energy Mix to Achieve the Reduction in Emission Intensity by 2030 as per INDCs [J].
Akash, A. R. ;
Rao, Anand B. ;
Chandel, Munish K. .
13TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES, GHGT-13, 2017, 114 :7492-7503
[5]  
Allen R, 1998, Paper No. 56
[6]   Decomposition analysis and Innovative Accounting Approach for energy-related CO2 (carbon dioxide) emissions intensity over 1996-2009 in Portugal [J].
Alves, Margarita Robaina ;
Moutinho, Victor .
ENERGY, 2013, 57 :775-787
[7]  
Anselin L, 2008, Spatial Panel Econometrics The Econometrics of Panel Data
[8]   Economic development and CO2 emissions:: A nonparametric panel approach [J].
Azomahou, Theophile ;
Laisney, Francois ;
Van, Phu Nguyen .
JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ECONOMICS, 2006, 90 (6-7) :1347-1363
[9]   Driving forces of global carbon emissions: From time- and spatial-dynamic perspectives [J].
Chang, Chun-Ping ;
Dong, Minyi ;
Sui, Bo ;
Chu, Yin .
ECONOMIC MODELLING, 2019, 77 :70-80
[10]  
Chen L Z, 2017, SCI TECHNOLOGY MANAG, V37, P228, DOI [10.3969/j.issn.1000-7695.2017.22.032, DOI 10.3969/J.ISSN.1000-7695.2017.22.032, DOI 10.3969/J.ISSN.1000-7695.2017.23.006]