Defining the notion of 'Information Content' and reasoning about it in a database

被引:2
作者
Xu, Kaibo [1 ,2 ]
Feng, Junkang [1 ,2 ]
Crowe, Malcolm [2 ]
机构
[1] Beijing Union Univ, Coll Business, E Business Res Inst, Beijing, Peoples R China
[2] Univ W Scotland, Sch Comp, Database Res Grp, Paisley, Renfrew, Scotland
关键词
Information content; Reasoning; Data semantics; Semantic information theory; Inference rules; SYSTEMS;
D O I
10.1007/s10115-008-0129-3
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
The problem of 'information content' of an information system appears elusive. In the field of databases, the information content of a database has been taken as the instance of a database. We argue that this view misses two fundamental points. One is a convincing conception of the phenomenon concerning information in databases, especially a properly defined notion of 'information content'. The other is a framework for reasoning about information content. In this paper, we suggest a modification of the well known definition of 'information content' given by Dretske(Knowledge and the flow of information,1981). We then define what we call the 'information content inclusion' relation (IIR for short) between two random events. We present a set of inference rules for reasoning about information content, which we call the IIR Rules. Then we explore how these ideas and the rules may be used in a database setting to look at databases and to derive otherwise hidden information by deriving new relations from a given set of IIR. A prototype is presented, which shows how the idea of IIR-Reasoning might be exploited in a database setting including the relationship between real world events and database values.
引用
收藏
页码:29 / 59
页数:31
相关论文
共 50 条
[41]   Information Transfer During a Transitive Reasoning Task [J].
Brzezicka, Aneta ;
Kaminski, Maciej ;
Kaminski, Jan ;
Blinowska, Katarzyna .
BRAIN TOPOGRAPHY, 2011, 24 (01) :1-8
[42]   Decisions, Graphs, and Artificial Reasoning for Uncertainty of Information [J].
Raglin, Adrienne ;
Metu, Somiya ;
Lott, Dawn A. .
ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND MACHINE LEARNING FOR MULTI-DOMAIN OPERATIONS APPLICATIONS III, 2021, 11746
[43]   Information Transfer During a Transitive Reasoning Task [J].
Aneta Brzezicka ;
Maciej Kamiński ;
Jan Kamiński ;
Katarzyna Blinowska .
Brain Topography, 2011, 24 :1-8
[44]   Effects of Information Content in Work Instructions for Operator Performance [J].
Li, Dan ;
Mattsson, Sandra ;
Salunkhe, Omkar ;
Fast-Berglund, Asa ;
Skoogh, Anders ;
Broberg, Jesper .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE 8TH SWEDISH PRODUCTION SYMPOSIUM (SPS 2018), 2018, 25 :628-635
[45]   Additional evidence for a dual-strategy model of reasoning: Probabilistic reasoning is more invariant than reasoning about logical validity [J].
Markovits, Henry ;
Brisson, Janie ;
de Chantal, Pier-Luc .
MEMORY & COGNITION, 2015, 43 (08) :1208-1215
[46]   Moving in and out of contexts in collaborative reasoning about equations [J].
Rystedt, Elisabeth ;
Helenius, Ola ;
Kilhamn, Cecilia .
JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICAL BEHAVIOR, 2016, 44 :50-64
[47]   Additional evidence for a dual-strategy model of reasoning: Probabilistic reasoning is more invariant than reasoning about logical validity [J].
Henry Markovits ;
Janie Brisson ;
Pier-Luc de Chantal .
Memory & Cognition, 2015, 43 :1208-1215
[48]   Good and Bad Reasoning about COVID-19 [J].
Cummings, Louise .
INFORMAL LOGIC, 2020, 40 (04) :521-544
[49]   Reasoning about mathematical fuzzy logic and its future [J].
Novak, Vilem .
FUZZY SETS AND SYSTEMS, 2012, 192 :25-44
[50]   Unveiling and Reasoning about Co-change Dependencies [J].
de Oliveira, Marcos Cesar ;
Bonifacio, Rodrigo ;
Ramos, Guilherme N. ;
Ribeiro, Marcio .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE 15TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MODULARITY (MODULARITY'16), 2016, :25-36