Lessons from the RAMPART study-and which is the best route of administration of benzodiazepines in status epilepticus

被引:41
作者
Silbergleit, Robert [1 ]
Lowenstein, Daniel [2 ]
Durkalski, Valerie [3 ]
Conwit, Robin [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Michigan, Dept Emergency Med, Ann Arbor, MI 48105 USA
[2] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Neurol, San Francisco, CA USA
[3] Med Univ S Carolina, Dept Publ Hlth Sci, Coll Med, Charleston, SC 29425 USA
[4] NINDS, NIH, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Midazolam; Lorazepam; Comparative efficacy; Emergency medical services; Intramuscular; DIAZEPAM; MIDAZOLAM; TRIALS;
D O I
10.1111/epi.12284
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Early treatment of prolonged seizures with benzodiazepines given intravenously by paramedics in the prehospital setting had been shown to be associated with improved outcomes, but the comparative efficacy and safety of an intramuscular (IM) route, which is faster and consistently achievable, was previously unknown. RAMPART (the Rapid Anticonvulsant Medication Prior to Arrival Trial) was a double-blind randomized clinical trial to determine if the efficacy of intramuscular (IM) midazolam is noninferior by a margin of 10% to that of intravenous (IV) lorazepam in patients treated by paramedics for status epilepticus (SE). In children and adults with >5min of convulsions and who are still seizing at paramedic arrival, midazolam administered by IM autoinjector was noninferior to IV lorazepam on the primary efficacy outcome with comparable safety. Patients treated with IM midazolam were more likely to have stopped seizing at emergency department (ED) arrival, without emergency medical services (EMS) rescue therapy, and were less likely to require any hospitalization or admission to an intensive care unit. Lessons from the RAMPART study's findings and potential implications on clinical practice, on the potential role of other routes of administration, on the effect of timing of interventions, and on future clinical trials are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:74 / 77
页数:4
相关论文
共 7 条
  • [1] A comparison of lorazepam, diazepam, and placebo for the treatment of out-of-hospital status epilepticus
    Alldredge, BK
    Gelb, AM
    Isaacs, SM
    Corry, MD
    Allen, F
    Ulrich, S
    Gottwald, MD
    O'Neil, N
    Neuhaus, JM
    Segal, MR
    Lowenstein, DH
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2001, 345 (09) : 631 - 637
  • [2] Challenges in the design and analysis of non-inferiority trials: a case study
    Durkalski, Valerie
    Silbergleit, Robert
    Lowenstein, Daniel
    [J]. CLINICAL TRIALS, 2011, 8 (05) : 601 - 608
  • [3] Midazolam Versus Diazepam for the Treatment of Status Epilepticus in Children and Young Adults: A Meta-analysis
    McMullan, Jason
    Sasson, Comilla
    Pancioli, Arthur
    Silbergleit, Robert
    [J]. ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2010, 17 (06) : 575 - 582
  • [4] THE 60-DAY TEMPERATURE-DEPENDENT DEGRADATION OF MIDAZOLAM AND LORAZEPAM IN THE PREHOSPITAL ENVIRONMENT
    McMullan, Jason T.
    Pinnawin, Ashley
    Jones, Elizabeth
    Denninghoff, Kurt
    Siewart, Nicholas
    Spaite, Daniel W.
    Zaleski, Erin
    Silbergleit, Robert
    [J]. PREHOSPITAL EMERGENCY CARE, 2013, 17 (01) : 1 - 7
  • [5] Implementation of the Exception From Informed Consent Regulations in a Large Multicenter Emergency Clinical Trials Network: The RAMPART Experience
    Silbergleit, Robert
    Biros, Michelle H.
    Harney, Deneil
    Dickert, Neal
    Baren, Jill
    [J]. ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2012, 19 (04) : 448 - 454
  • [6] Intramuscular versus Intravenous Therapy for Prehospital Status Epilepticus
    Silbergleit, Robert
    Durkalski, Valerie
    Lowenstein, Daniel
    Conwit, Robin
    Pancioli, Arthur
    Palesch, Yuko
    Barsan, William
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2012, 366 (07) : 591 - 600
  • [7] Midazolam and diazepam for pediatric seizures in the prehospital setting
    Warden, Craig R.
    Frederick, Carrie
    [J]. PREHOSPITAL EMERGENCY CARE, 2006, 10 (04) : 463 - 467