Why do patients with multimorbidity in England report worse experiences in primary care? Evidence from the General Practice Patient Survey

被引:37
|
作者
Paddison, Charlotte A. M. [1 ]
Saunders, Catherine L. [2 ]
Abel, Gary A. [1 ]
Payne, Rupert A. [1 ]
Campbe, John L. [3 ]
Roland, Martin [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cambridge, Cambridge Ctr Hlth Serv Res, Cambridge, England
[2] RAND Europe, Cambridge, England
[3] Univ Exeter, Dept Primary Care, Exeter, Devon, England
来源
BMJ OPEN | 2015年 / 5卷 / 03期
关键词
CLINICAL-PRACTICE GUIDELINES; MULTIPLE CHRONIC CONDITIONS; HEALTH; QUALITY; PREVALENCE; PAY; PERFORMANCE; MANAGEMENT; OUTCOMES; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006172
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives: To describe and explain the primary care experiences of people with multiple long-term conditions in England. Design and methods: Using questionnaire data from 906 578 responders to the English 2012 General Practice Patient Survey, we describe the primary care experiences of patients with long-term conditions, including 583 143 patients who reported one or more long-term conditions. We employed mixed effect logistic regressions to analyse data on six items covering three care domains (access, continuity and communication) and a single item on overall primary care experience. We controlled for sociodemographic characteristics, and for general practice using a random effect, and further, controlled for, and explored the importance of, health-related quality of life measured using the EuroQoL (EQ-5D) scale. Results: Most patients with long-term conditions report a positive experience of care at their general practice (after adjusting for sociodemographic characteristics and general practice, range 74.0-93.1% reporting positive experience of care across seven questions) with only modest variation by type of condition. For all three domains of patient experience, an increasing number of comorbid conditions is associated with a reducing percentage of patients reporting a positive experience of care. For example, compared with respondents with no long-term condition, the OR for reporting a positive experience is 0.83 (95% CI 0.80 to 0.87) for respondents with four or more long-term conditions. However, this relationship is no longer observed after adjusting for health-related quality of life (OR (95% CI) single condition=1.23 (1.21 to 1.26); four or more conditions=1.31 (1.25 to 1.37)), with pain making the greatest difference among five quality of life variables included in the analysis. Conclusions: Patients with multiple long-term conditions more frequently report worse experiences in primary care. However, patient-centred measures of health-related quality of life, especially pain, are more important than the number of conditions in explaining why patients with multiple long-term conditions report worse experiences of care.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 30 条
  • [21] How do adults with physical disability experience primary care? A nationwide cross-sectional survey of access among patients in England
    Popplewell, Nicola T. A.
    Rechel, Boika P. D.
    Abel, Gary A.
    BMJ OPEN, 2014, 4 (08):
  • [22] Patients' perceptions of safety in general practice captured using an online patient safety questionnaire for primary care (PREOS-PC)
    Salema, N.
    Gangannagaripalli, J.
    Mounce, L.
    Valderas, J. M.
    Ricci-Cabello, I.
    Avery, A.
    PHARMACOEPIDEMIOLOGY AND DRUG SAFETY, 2020, 29 : 20 - 20
  • [23] Is the co-location of GPs in primary care centres associated with a higher patient satisfaction? Evidence from a population survey in Italy
    Bonciani, Manila
    Barsanti, Sara
    Murante, Anna Maria
    BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2017, 17
  • [24] Why do so few patients with heart failure participate in cardiac rehabilitatior? A cross-sectional survey from England, Wales and Northern Ireland
    Dalal, Hasnain M.
    Wingham, Jennifer
    Palmer, Joanne
    Taylor, Rod
    Petre, Corinna
    Lewin, Robert
    BMJ OPEN, 2012, 2 (02):
  • [25] Effects of Intensive Primary Care on High-Need Patient Experiences: Survey Findings from a Veterans Affairs Randomized Quality Improvement Trial
    Zulman, Donna M.
    Chang, Evelyn T.
    Wong, Ava
    Yoon, Jean
    Stockdale, Susan E.
    Ong, Michael K.
    Rubenstein, Lisa V.
    Asch, Steven M.
    JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2019, 34 (Suppl 1) : 75 - 81
  • [26] Patient, Provider, and Practice Characteristics Predicting Use of Diagnostic Imaging in Primary Care: Cross-Sectional Data From the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey
    Yi, Sue Y.
    Narayan, Anand K.
    Miles, Randy C.
    Rother, Maria D. Martin
    Robbins, Jessica B.
    Flores, Efren J.
    Ross, Andrew B.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF RADIOLOGY, 2023, 20 (12) : 1193 - 1206
  • [27] The impact of family doctor system on patients' utilisation of general practitioner in primary care facilities-Evidence from Hangzhou, China
    Yu, Yang
    Ye, Aizhen
    Chen, Cen
    Dai, Weidong
    Liu, Xu
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEALTH PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT, 2022, 37 (06) : 3089 - 3102
  • [28] Delivery of patient-centered care in complementary medicine: Insights and evidence from the Chinese medical practitioners and patients in primary care consultations in Hong Kong
    Pun, Jack
    Chor, Winnie
    Zhong, Linda
    COMPLEMENTARY THERAPIES IN MEDICINE, 2019, 45 : 198 - 204
  • [29] Continuity of care and consultation mode in general practice: a cross-sectional and longitudinal study using patient-level and practice-level data from before and during the COVID-19 pandemic in England
    Parry, Will
    Fraser, Caroline
    Crellin, Elizabeth
    Hughes, Jay
    Vestesson, Emma
    Clarke, Geraldine M.
    BMJ OPEN, 2023, 13 (11):
  • [30] Do patients with mental health and substance use conditions experience discrimination and diagnostic overshadowing in primary care in Aotearoa New Zealand? Results from a national online survey
    Cunningham, Ruth
    Imlach, Fiona
    Lockett, Helen
    Lacey, Cameron
    Haitana, Tracy
    Every-Palmer, Susanna
    Clark, Mau Te Rangimarie
    Peterson, Debbie
    JOURNAL OF PRIMARY HEALTH CARE, 2023, 15 (02) : 112 - 121