Superior liver sparing by combined coplanar/noncoplanar volumetric-modulated arc therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma: A planning and feasibility study

被引:6
作者
Tsai, Yi-Chun [1 ]
Tsai, Chiao-Ling [1 ]
Hsu, Feng-Ming [1 ]
Wu, Jian-Kuen [1 ,5 ]
Wu, Chien-Jang [5 ]
Cheng, Jason Chia-Hsien [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Natl Taiwan Univ Hosp, Dept Oncol, Div Radiat Oncol, Taipei 10002, Taiwan
[2] Natl Taiwan Univ, Coll Med, Grad Inst Oncol, Taipei 10764, Taiwan
[3] Natl Taiwan Univ, Coll Med, Grad Inst Clin Med, Taipei 10764, Taiwan
[4] Natl Taiwan Univ, Coll Med, Canc Res Ctr, Taipei 10764, Taiwan
[5] Natl Taiwan Normal Univ, Inst Electroopt Sci & Technol, Taipei, Taiwan
关键词
Volumetric-modulated arc therapy; Hepatocellular carcinoma; Liver; Noncoplanar; STEREOTACTIC BODY RADIOTHERAPY; PROTON-BEAM THERAPY; RADIATION-THERAPY; LOCAL RADIOTHERAPY; DISEASE; RADIOSURGERY;
D O I
10.1016/j.meddos.2013.04.003
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Compared with step-and-shoot intensity-modulated radiotherapy (sIMRT) and tomotherapy, volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) allows additional arc configurations in treatment planning and noncoplanar (NC) delivery. This study was first to compare VMAT planning with sIMRT planning, and the second to evaluate the toxicity of coplanar (C)/NC-VMAT treatment in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Fifteen patients with HCC (7 with left-lobe and 8 with right-lobe tumors) were planned with C-VMAT, C/NC-VMAT, and sIMRT. The median total dose was 49 Gy (range: 40 to 56 Gy), whereas the median fractional dose was 3.5 Gy (range: 3 to 8 Gy). Different doses/fractionations were converted to normalized doses of 2 Gy per fraction using an alpha/beta ratio of 2.5. The mean liver dose, volume fraction receiving more than 10 Gy (V10), 20 Gy (V20), 30 Gy (V30), effective volume (V-eff), and equivalent uniform dose (EUD) were compared. C/NC-VMAT in 6 patients was evaluated for delivery accuracy and treatment-related toxicity. Compared with sIMRT, both C-VMAT (p = 0.001) and C/NC-VMAT (p = 0.03) had significantly improved target conformity index. Compared with C-VMAT and sIMRT, C/NC-VMAT for treating left-lobe tumors provided significantly better liver sparing as evidenced by differences in mean liver dose (p = 0.03 and p = 0.007), V10 (p = 0.003 and p = 0.009), V20 (p = 0.006 and p = 0.01), V30 (p = 0.02 and p = 0.002), V-eff (P = 0.006 and p = 0.001), and EUD = 0.04 and p = 0.003), respectively. For right-lobe tumors, there was no difference in liver sparing between C/NC-VMAT, C-VMAT, and sIMRT. In all patients, dose to more than 95% of target points met the 3%/3 mm criteria. All 6 patients tolerated C/NC-VMAT and none of them had treatment-related >= grade 2 toxicity. The C/NC-VMAT can be used clinically for HCC and provides significantly better liver sparing in patients with left-lobe tumors. (C) 2013 American Association of Medical Dosimetrists.
引用
收藏
页码:366 / 371
页数:6
相关论文
共 24 条
  • [1] Dosimetric comparison of volumetric modulated arc therapy and intensity-modulated radiation therapy for pancreatic malignancies
    Ali, Arif N.
    Dhabaan, Anees H.
    Jarrio, Christie S.
    Siddiqi, Arsalan K.
    Landry, Jerome C.
    [J]. MEDICAL DOSIMETRY, 2012, 37 (03) : 271 - 275
  • [2] Biologic susceptibility of hepatocellular carcinoma patients treated with radiotherapy to radiation-induced liver disease
    Cheng, JCH
    Wu, JK
    Lee, PCT
    Liu, HS
    Jian, JJM
    Lin, YM
    Sung, JL
    Jan, GJ
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2004, 60 (05): : 1502 - 1509
  • [3] Radiation-induced liver disease after three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: Dosimetric analysis and implication
    Cheng, JCH
    Wu, JK
    Huang, CM
    Liu, HS
    Huang, DY
    Cheng, SH
    Tsai, SY
    Jian, JJM
    Lin, YM
    Cheng, TI
    Horng, CF
    Huang, AT
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2002, 54 (01): : 156 - 162
  • [4] Local radiotherapy with or without transcatheter arterial chemoemboliziation for patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma
    Cheng, JCH
    Chuang, VP
    Cheng, SH
    Huang, AT
    Lin, YM
    Cheng, TI
    Yang, PS
    You, DL
    Jian, JJM
    Tsai, SY
    Sung, JL
    Horng, CF
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2000, 47 (02): : 435 - 442
  • [5] SYNERGISTIC EFFECT OF RADIATION AND INTERLEUKIN-6 ON HEPATITIS B VIRUS REACTIVATION IN LIVER THROUGH STAT3 SIGNALING PATHWAY
    Chou, Chia Hung
    Chen, Pei-Jer
    Jeng, Yung-Ming
    Cheng, Ann-Lti
    Huang, Li-Rung
    Cheng, Jason Chia-Hsien
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2009, 75 (05): : 1545 - 1552
  • [6] FEASIBILITY OF SINGLE-ISOCENTER VOLUMETRIC MODULATED ARC RADIOSURGERY FOR TREATMENT OF MULTIPLE BRAIN METASTASES
    Clark, Grant M.
    Popple, Richard A.
    Young, P. Edward
    Fiveash, John B.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2010, 76 (01): : 296 - 302
  • [7] Dawson LA, 2002, INT J RADIAT ONCOL, V53, P810, DOI 10.1016/S0360-3016(02)02846-8
  • [8] Individualized image guided iso-NTCP based liver cancer SBRT
    Dawson, Laura A.
    Eccles, Cynthia
    Craig, Tim
    [J]. ACTA ONCOLOGICA, 2006, 45 (07) : 856 - 864
  • [9] Delana A, 2009, STRAHLENTHER ONKOL, V185, P453, DOI 10.1007/s00066-009-1888-9
  • [10] Dosimetric comparisons of helical tomotherapy treatment plans and step-and-shoot intensity-modulated radiosurgery treatment plans in intracranl stereotactic radiosurgery
    Han, Chunhui
    Liu, An
    Schultheiss, Timothy E.
    Pezner, Richard D.
    Chen, Yi-Jen
    Wong, Jeffrey Y. C.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2006, 65 (02): : 608 - 616