Perceiving economic inequality in everyday life decreases tolerance to inequality

被引:65
作者
Diego Garcia-Castro, Juan [1 ,2 ]
Rodriguez-Bailon, Rosa [2 ]
Willis, Guillermo B. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Costa Rica, San Jose, Costa Rica
[2] Univ Granada, Granada, Spain
关键词
Economic inequality; Everyday life; Perceived inequality; Tolerance to inequality; Attitudes toward redistribution; REDISTRIBUTION EVIDENCE; SOCIAL-CLASS; PERCEPTIONS; SUPPORT; ATTITUDES; PREFERENCES; NATIONS; SHAPES; WEALTH;
D O I
10.1016/j.jesp.2020.104019
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Economic inequality is one of the main issues of modern societies, and one of the ways to reduce it is through decreasing inequality tolerance and increasing support for economic redistribution. However, there are no consistent results in previous research about the relationship between perceived economic inequality, tolerance to inequality, and support for redistributive policies. In this paper, we argue that rather than measuring the effects of abstract perceived inequality (e.g., measured at the country level), it is important to consider Perceived Economic Inequality in Everyday Life (PEIEL) and close relationships. In one correlational study (N = 207) we found that a PEIEL scale predicts intolerance toward inequality controlling for the common measures of perceived inequality. Moreover, we developed a novel manipulation which was validated in a pilot study (N = 293), and in four experimental studies (N = 261; N = 373; N = 289, N = 289), we found that PEIEL decreases tolerance to inequality. Furthermore, we found a preliminary indirect effect of PEIEL on attitudes toward redistribution through intolerance to inequality. A mini meta-analysis using political ideology, social class, sex, and age as covariates, corroborated these results. All studies were preregistered. In short, these results highlight the importance of perceived inequality in everyday life as an additional tool when considering the psychosocial effects of economic inequality.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 62 条
[1]  
Alvaredo FacundoChancel., 2017, WORLD INEQUALITY REP
[2]  
[Anonymous], **DATA OBJECT**, DOI DOI 10.4232/1.12777
[3]   The Wealth of Nations: International Judgments Regarding Actual and Ideal Resource Distributions [J].
Arsenio, William F. .
CURRENT DIRECTIONS IN PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2018, 27 (05) :357-362
[4]  
Atkinson Anthony, 2015, Inequality: What Can be Done?
[5]   Living apart, losing sympathy? How neighbourhood context affects attitudes to redistribution and to welfare recipients [J].
Bailey, Nick ;
Gannon, Maria ;
Kearns, Ade ;
Livingston, Mark ;
Leyland, Alastair H. .
ENVIRONMENT AND PLANNING A-ECONOMY AND SPACE, 2013, 45 (09) :2154-2175
[6]   Polarized perceptions, polarized preferences? Understanding the relationship between inequality and preferences for redistribution [J].
Bobzien, Licia .
JOURNAL OF EUROPEAN SOCIAL POLICY, 2020, 30 (02) :206-220
[7]   Wanting What Is Fair: How Party Cues and Information about Income Inequality Affect Public Support for Taxes [J].
Boudreau, Cheryl ;
MacKenzie, Scott A. .
JOURNAL OF POLITICS, 2018, 80 (02) :367-381
[8]   Subjective Status Shapes Political Preferences [J].
Brown-Iannuzzi, Jazmin L. ;
Lundberg, Kristjen B. ;
Kay, Aaron C. ;
Payne, B. Keith .
PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2015, 26 (01) :15-26
[9]  
Castillo Juan Carlos, 2012, Psykhe, V21, P99
[10]  
Chester D., 2019, CONSTRUCT VALIDATION, DOI [10.31234/osf.io/t7ev9., DOI 10.31234/OSF.IO/T7EV9]