Graphical Jogthrough: expert based methodology for user interface evaluation, applied in the case of an educational simulation interface

被引:5
|
作者
Demetriadis, S [1 ]
Karoulis, A [1 ]
Pombortsis, A [1 ]
机构
[1] Aristotelian Univ Salonika, Dept Comp Sci, GR-54006 Salonika, Greece
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0360-1315(99)00009-3
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Walkthrough and "Jogthrough" techniques are well known;expert based methodologies for the evaluation of user interface design. In this paper we describe the use of "Graphical" Jogthrough method for evaluating the interface design of the Network Simulator, an educational simulation program that enables users to virtually build a computer network, install hardware and software components, make the necessary settings and test the functionality of the network. Graphical Jogthrough is a further modification of a typical Jogthrough method, where evaluators' ratings produce evidence in the form of a graph, presenting estimated proportion of users who effectively use the interface versus the time they had to work with it in order to succeed effectiveness. We comment on the question: "What are the possible benefits and limitations of the Graphical Jogthrough method when applied in the case of educational software interface design?" We present the results of the evaluation session, and concluding from our experience we argue that the method could offer designers quantitative and qualitative data for formulating a useful (though rough in some aspects) estimation about the novice-becoming-expert pace that end users might follow when working with the evaluated interface. (C) 1999 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:285 / 299
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Component-Based Development of Educational Games: The Case of the User Interface
    Maciuszek, Dennis
    Ruddeck, Geraldine
    Martens, Alke
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 4TH EUROPEAN CONFERENCE ON GAMES BASED LEARNING, 2010, : 208 - 217
  • [32] Visual Design Checklist for Graphical User Interface (GUI) Evaluation
    Camargo, Murilo C.
    Barros, Rodolfo M.
    Barros, Vanessa T. O.
    33RD ANNUAL ACM SYMPOSIUM ON APPLIED COMPUTING, 2018, : 670 - 672
  • [33] A comparison of natural user interface and graphical user interface for narrative in HMD-based augmented reality
    Jin, Yunshui
    Ma, Minhua
    Zhu, Yongning
    MULTIMEDIA TOOLS AND APPLICATIONS, 2022, 81 (04) : 5795 - 5826
  • [34] SIMULATION OF VISUAL ASSESSMENT FOR THE GIVEN DEPLOYMENT OF GRAPHICAL USER INTERFACE ELEMENTS
    Skiera, Daniel
    Hoenig, Mark
    Hoetzel, Juergen
    Dabrowski, Pawel
    Nikiel, Slawomir
    PROCEEDINGS 26TH EUROPEAN CONFERENCE ON MODELLING AND SIMULATION ECMS 2012, 2012, : 216 - +
  • [35] LECA: Educational package with graphical user interface for descriptive statistics and probability in R
    Barbosa, Ana Carolina A.
    Gebert, Deyse M. P.
    Kist, Airton
    SIGMAE, 2019, 8 (02): : 306 - 314
  • [36] Modelling, simulation, and graphical user interface for industrial gas carburising process
    Gupta, GS
    Chaudhuri, A
    Kumar, PV
    MATERIALS SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2002, 18 (10) : 1188 - 1194
  • [37] Knowledge based expert systems: User interface implications
    Berrais, A
    ADVANCES IN ENGINEERING SOFTWARE, 1997, 28 (01) : 31 - 41
  • [38] Building a graphical user interface for the expert system of fiber reinforced plastics liquid containers
    Ghany, KMA
    Farag, MM
    CURRENT ADVANCES IN MECHANICAL DESIGN AND PRODUCTION VI, 1996, : 349 - 357
  • [39] Fragments-Expert: A graphical user interface MATLAB toolbox for classification of file fragments
    Teimouri, Mehdi
    Seyedghorban, Zahra
    Amirjani, Fatemeh
    Concurrency and Computation: Practice and Experience, 2021, 33 (09)
  • [40] Evaluation of user interaction with daylighting simulation in a tangible user interface
    Nasman, Joshua
    Cutler, Barbara
    AUTOMATION IN CONSTRUCTION, 2013, 36 : 117 - 127