Techno-economic analysis of producing solid biofuels and biochar from forest residues using portable systems

被引:142
作者
Sahoo, Kamalakanta [1 ,2 ]
Bilek, Edward [1 ]
Bergman, Richard [1 ]
Mani, Sudhagar [2 ]
机构
[1] US Forest Serv, Forest Prod Lab, Madison, WI 53726 USA
[2] Univ Georgia, Sch Chem Mat & Biomed Engn, Athens, GA 30602 USA
关键词
Portable biomass conversion technology (BCT); Briquettes; Torrefied briquettes; Biochar; Techno-economic analysis; And forest residues; LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT; BIOMASS PELLETS; SUPPLY CHAIN; ECONOMIC-ANALYSIS; PYROLYSIS SYSTEM; POWER-GENERATION; CLIMATE-CHANGE; BIO-OIL; ENERGY; TORREFACTION;
D O I
10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.10.076
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Wildfires are getting extreme and more frequent because of increased fuel loads in the forest and extended dry conditions. Prevention of wildfire by fuel treatment methods will generate forest residues in large volumes, which in addition to available logging residues, can be used to produce biofuels and bioproducts. In this study, the techno-economic assessment of three portable systems to produce woodchips briquettes (WCB), torrefied-woodchips briquettes (TWCB) and biochar from forest residues were evaluated using pilot-scale experimental data. A discounted cash flow rate of return method was used to estimate minimum selling prices (MSPs) for each product, to conduct sensitivity analyses, and to identify potential cost-reduction strategies. Using a before-finance -and-tax 16.5% nominal required return on investment, and a mean transport distance of 200 km, the estimated delivered MSPs per oven-dry metric ton (ODMT) of WCB, TWCB, and biochar were $162, $274, and $1044 respectively. The capital investment (16-30%), labor cost (23-28%), and feedstock cost (10-13%) without stumpage cost were the major factors influencing the MSP of solid biofuels and biochar. However, the MSPs of WCB, TWCB, and biochar could be reduced to $65, $145, and $470/ODMT respectively with technologically improved portable systems. In addition, the MSPs of solid biofuels and biochar could be further reduced by renewable energy and carbon credits, if the greenhouse gas (GHG) reduction potentials are quantified and remunerated. In conclusion, portable systems could be economically feasible to use forest residues and make useful products at current market prices while simultaneously reducing potential wildfires and GHG emissions.
引用
收藏
页码:578 / 590
页数:13
相关论文
共 86 条
[1]   Comparative cradle-to-gate life cycle assessment of wood pellet production with torrefaction [J].
Adams, P. W. R. ;
Shirley, J. E. J. ;
McManus, M. C. .
APPLIED ENERGY, 2015, 138 :367-380
[2]   A comparative economic analysis of torrefied pellet production based on state-of-the-art pellets [J].
Agar, David A. .
BIOMASS & BIOENERGY, 2017, 97 :155-161
[3]   The role of biochar and biochar-compost in improving soil quality and crop performance: A review [J].
Agegnehu, Getachew ;
Srivastava, A. K. ;
Bird, Michael I. .
APPLIED SOIL ECOLOGY, 2017, 119 :156-170
[4]   A COMPARATIVE LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT OF BRIQUETTING LOGGING RESIDUES AND LUMBER MANUFACTURING COPRODUCTS IN WESTERN UNITED STATES [J].
Alanya-Rosenbaum, S. ;
Bergman, R. D. ;
Ganguly, I. ;
Pierobon, F. .
APPLIED ENGINEERING IN AGRICULTURE, 2018, 34 (01) :11-24
[5]  
ALL Power Labs, 2017, PP20 POW PALL
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2013, STATE BIOCHAR IND SU
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2014, Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change 2013
[8]  
[Anonymous], THESIS
[9]  
[Anonymous], 2013, PNNL23053
[10]  
[Anonymous], 2011, EP4963FEB2006 ASAE