Children's Cognitive and Behavioral Reactions to an Autonomous Versus Controlled Social Robot Dog

被引:33
作者
Chernyak, Nadia [1 ]
Gary, Heather E. [2 ]
机构
[1] Boston Univ, Dept Psychol & Brain Sci, 64 Cummington Mall, Boston, MA 02215 USA
[2] Univ Washington, Dept Psychol, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
关键词
INFERENCES; EXPLANATIONS; PERCEPTION; BELIEFS;
D O I
10.1080/10409289.2016.1158611
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Research Findings: Interactive technology has become ubiquitous in young children's lives, but little is known about how children incorporate such technologies into their intuitive biological theories. Here we explore how the manner in which technology is introduced to young children impacts their biological reasoning, moral regard, and prosocial behavior toward it. We asked 5-and 7-year-old children to interact with a robot dog that was described either as moving autonomously or as remote controlled. Compared with a controlled robot, the autonomous robot caused children to ascribe higher emotional and physical sentience to the robot, to reference the robot as having desires and physiological states, and to reference moral concerns as applying to the robot. Children who owned a dog at home were more likely to behave prosocially toward the autonomous robot than those who did not. Practice or Policy: Recent work has begun to use robots as learning tools. Our results suggest that the manner in which robots are introduced to young children may differentially impact children's learning. Presenting robots as autonomous agents may help promote children's social-emotional development, whereas presenting robots as human controlled may help promote robots as purely cognitive educational tools.
引用
收藏
页码:1175 / 1189
页数:15
相关论文
共 41 条
[31]   SOCIAL COGNITIVE-DEVELOPMENT - DOMAIN DISTINCTIONS AND COORDINATIONS [J].
SMETANA, JG .
DEVELOPMENTAL REVIEW, 1983, 3 (02) :131-147
[32]  
Smith CE, 2013, PLOS ONE, V8, DOI [10.1371/journal.pone.0059510, 10.1371/annotation/4b9340db-455b-4e0d-86e5-b6783747111f]
[33]   The blicket within: Preschoolers' inferences about insides and causes [J].
Sobel, David M. ;
Yoachim, Caroline M. ;
Gopnik, Alison ;
Meltzoff, Andrew N. ;
Blumenthal, Emily J. .
JOURNAL OF COGNITION AND DEVELOPMENT, 2007, 8 (02) :159-182
[34]   Remote control and children's understanding of robots [J].
Somanader, Mark C. ;
Saylor, Megan M. ;
Levin, Daniel T. .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL CHILD PSYCHOLOGY, 2011, 109 (02) :239-247
[35]   Experience matters: The impact of doing versus watching on infants' subsequent perception of tool-use events [J].
Sommerville, Jessica A. ;
Hildebrand, Elina A. ;
Crane, Catharyn C. .
DEVELOPMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2008, 44 (05) :1249-1256
[36]   The Two Sources of Moral Standing [J].
Sytsma, Justin ;
Machery, Edouard .
REVIEW OF PHILOSOPHY AND PSYCHOLOGY, 2012, 3 (03) :303-324
[37]  
Turiel E., 1983, The development of social knowledge: Morality and convention
[38]   Three-year-old children intervene in third-party moral transgressions [J].
Vaish, Amrisha ;
Missana, Manuela ;
Tomasello, Michael .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF DEVELOPMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2011, 29 (01) :124-130
[39]   Helping the In-Group Feels Better: Children's Judgments and Emotion Attributions in Response to Prosocial Dilemmas [J].
Weller, Drika ;
Lagattuta, Kristin Hansen .
CHILD DEVELOPMENT, 2013, 84 (01) :253-268
[40]   Reinvigorating Explanations for the Study of Early Cognitive Development [J].
Wellman, Henry M. .
CHILD DEVELOPMENT PERSPECTIVES, 2011, 5 (01) :33-38