Human Error in Autonomous Underwater Vehicle Deployment: A System Dynamics Approach

被引:8
作者
Tzu Yang Loh [1 ]
Brito, Mario P. [2 ]
Bose, Neil [3 ]
Xu, Jingjing [4 ]
Tenekedjiev, Kiril [1 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tasmania, Australian Maritime Coll, 1 Maritime Way, Launceston, Tas 7250, Australia
[2] Univ Southampton, Southampton Business Sch, Ctr Risk Res, Southampton, Hants, England
[3] Mem Univ Newfoundland, St John, NF, Canada
[4] Univ Plymouth, Plymouth Business Sch, Plymouth, Devon, England
[5] Nikola Vaptsarov Naval Acad, Varna, Bulgaria
关键词
AUV; human error; risk analysis framework; risk of loss; systems-based; RISK; RETENTION; BENEATH;
D O I
10.1111/risa.13467
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
The use of autonomous underwater vehicles (AUVs) for various applications have grown with maturing technology and improved accessibility. The deployment of AUVs for under-ice marine science research in the Antarctic is one such example. However, a higher risk of AUV loss is present during such endeavors due to the extremities in the Antarctic. A thorough analysis of risks is therefore crucial for formulating effective risk control policies and achieving a lower risk of loss. Existing risk analysis approaches focused predominantly on the technical aspects, as well as identifying static cause and effect relationships in the chain of events leading to AUV loss. Comparatively, the complex interrelationships between risk variables and other aspects of risk such as human errors have received much lesser attention. In this article, a systems-based risk analysis framework facilitated by system dynamics methodology is proposed to overcome existing shortfalls. To demonstrate usefulness of the framework, it is applied on an actual AUV program to examine the occurrence of human error during Antarctic deployment. Simulation of the resultant risk model showed an overall decline in human error incident rate with the increase in experience of the AUV team. Scenario analysis based on the example provided policy recommendations in areas of training, practice runs, recruitment policy, and setting of risk tolerance level. The proposed risk analysis framework is pragmatically useful for risk analysis of future AUV programs to ensure the sustainability of operations, facilitating both better control and monitoring of risk.
引用
收藏
页码:1258 / 1278
页数:21
相关论文
共 68 条
[1]   Development of socio-technical disaster model [J].
Aini, M. S. ;
Fakhrul-Razi, A. .
SAFETY SCIENCE, 2010, 48 (10) :1286-1295
[2]   Practice and retention: A unifying analysis [J].
Anderson, JR ;
Fincham, JM ;
Douglass, S .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-LEARNING MEMORY AND COGNITION, 1999, 25 (05) :1120-1136
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1983, HDB HUMAN RELIABILIT
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2013, MAKING HARD DECISION
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2016, ORG CULTURE LEADERSH
[6]  
[Anonymous], 48 SOC
[7]   Factors that influence skill decay and retention: A quantitative review and analysis [J].
Arthur, W ;
Bennett, W ;
Stanush, PL ;
McNelly, TL .
HUMAN PERFORMANCE, 1998, 11 (01) :57-101
[8]  
Bell J., 2009, Review of human reliability assessment methods
[9]   A system dynamics model for behavioral analysis of safety conditions in a chemical storage unit [J].
Bouloiz, Hafida ;
Garbolino, Emmanuel ;
Tkiouat, Mohamed ;
Guarnieri, Franck .
SAFETY SCIENCE, 2013, 58 :32-40
[10]  
Brito Mario P., 2014, Methods in Oceanography, V10, P122, DOI 10.1016/j.mio.2014.07.003