Identifying Cochlear Implant Channels With Relatively Poor Electrode-Neuron Interfaces Using the Electrically Evoked Compound Action Potential

Objectives: The primary objective of this study was to quantify local (within ear) and global (between ear) variation in the cochlear implant (CI) electrode-neuron interface (ENI) using the electrically evoked compound action potential (ECAP). We tested the hypothesis that, within an ear, ECAP measures can be used to identify channels with presumed good and poor ENIs, which may be influenced by a combination of spiral ganglion neuron (SGN) density, electrode position, and cochlear resistivity. We also hypothesized that ECAP responses would reflect age-related differences in the global quality of the ENI between younger and older listeners who theoretically differ in SGN density. Design: Data were obtained from 18 implanted ears (13 individuals) with Advanced Bionics HiRes 90K devices. Six participants (8 ears) were adolescents or young adults (age range: 14-32 years), and 7 participants (10 ears) were older adults (age range: 54-88 years). In each ear, single-channel auditory detection thresholds were measured on channels 2 through 15 in response to a spatially focused electrode configuration (steered quadrupolar; focusing coefficient = 0.9). ECAP amplitudes, amplitude growth function (AGF) slopes, and thresholds were assessed on a subset of channels in each ear in response to three interphase gaps (0, 7, and 30 mu s). ECAP peak amplitudes were assessed on all channels between 2 and 15. AGFs and ECAP thresholds were measured on the two nonadjacent channels with the lowest and highest focused behavioral thresholds in each ear. ECAP responses were compared across low- and high-threshold channels and between younger and older CI listeners. Results: Channels that were estimated to interface poorly with the auditory nerve (i.e., high-focused-threshold channels) had steeper ECAP AGF slopes, smaller dynamic ranges, and higher ECAP thresholds than channels with low focused thresholds. Younger listeners had steeper ECAP AGF slopes and larger ECAP peak amplitudes than older listeners. Moreover, younger listeners showed greater interphase gap sensitivity for ECAP amplitude than older listeners. Conclusions: ECAP responses may be used to quantify both local (within ear) and global (between ear) variation in the quality of the ENI. Results of this study support future investigation into the use of ECAP responses in site-selection CI programming strategies. The present results also support a growing body of evidence suggesting that adolescents and young adults with CIs may have denser populations of functional SGNs relative to older adults. Potential differences in global SGN integrity between younger and older listeners warrant investigation of optimal CI programming interventions based on their divergent hearing histories.