Guideline appraisal with AGREE II: online survey of the potential influence of AGREE II items on overall assessment of guideline quality and recommendation for use

被引:99
作者
Hoffmann-Esser, Wiebke [1 ,2 ]
Siering, Ulrich [1 ]
Neugebauer, Edmund A. M. [3 ]
Brockhaus, Anne Catharina [1 ]
McGauran, Natalie [1 ]
Eikermann, Michaela [4 ]
机构
[1] Inst Qual & Efficiency Hlth Care IQWiG, Mediapk 8, D-50670 Cologne, Germany
[2] Univ Witten Herdecke, Inst Res Operat Med IFOM, Campus Cologne, Cologne, Germany
[3] Univ Witten Herdecke, Hlth Serv Res, Alfred Herrhausen Str 50, D-58448 Witten, Germany
[4] German Social Hlth Insurance MDS, Med Advisory Serv, Theodor Althoff Str 47, D-45133 Essen, Germany
关键词
Clinical practice guidelines; Methodological guideline appraisal; Methodological quality; Systematic reviews; CLINICAL-PRACTICE GUIDELINES; MANAGEMENT; CANCER; IMPLEMENTATION; CARE; DISSEMINATION; DIAGNOSIS; PROGRAM; DISEASE; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1186/s12913-018-2954-8
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: The AGREE II instrument is the most commonly used guideline appraisal tool. It includes 23 appraisal criteria (items) organized within six domains. AGREE II also includes two overall assessments (overall guideline quality, recommendation for use). Our aim was to investigate how strongly the 23 AGREE II items influence the two overall assessments. Methods: An online survey of authors of publications on guideline appraisals with AGREE II and guideline users from a German scientific network was conducted between 10th February 2015 and 30th March 2015. Participants were asked to rate the influence of the AGREE II items on a Likert scale (0 = no influence to 5 = very strong influence). The frequencies of responses and their dispersion were presented descriptively. Results: Fifty-eight of the 376 persons contacted (15.4%) participated in the survey and the data of the 51 respondents with prior knowledge of AGREE II were analysed. Items 7-12 of Domain 3 (rigour of development) and both items of Domain 6 (editorial independence) had the strongest influence on the two overall assessments. In addition, Items 15-17 (clarity of presentation) had a strong influence on the recommendation for use. Great variations were shown for the other items. The main limitation of the survey is the low response rate. Conclusions: In guideline appraisals using AGREE II, items representing rigour of guideline development and editorial independence seem to have the strongest influence on the two overall assessments. In order to ensure a transparent approach to reaching the overall assessments, we suggest the inclusion of a recommendation in the AGREE II user manual on how to consider item and domain scores. For instance, the manual could include an a-priori weighting of those items and domains that should have the strongest influence on the two overall assessments. The relevance of these assessments within AGREE II could thereby be further specified.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 62 条
[1]   Quality Assessment of Asthma Clinical Practice Guidelines A Systematic Appraisal [J].
Acuna-Izcaray, Agustin ;
Sanchez-Angarita, Efrain ;
Plaza, Vicente ;
Rodrigo, Gustavo ;
Montes de Oca, Maria ;
Gich, Ignasi ;
Bonfill, Xavier ;
Alonso-Coello, Pablo .
CHEST, 2013, 144 (02) :390-397
[2]  
AGREE Collaboration, 2006, APPR GUID RES EV AGR
[3]   A Systematic Review of Recent Clinical Practice Guidelines on the Diagnosis, Assessment and Management of Hypertension [J].
Al-Ansary, Lubna A. ;
Tricco, Andrea C. ;
Adi, Yaser ;
Bawazeer, Ghada ;
Perrier, Laure ;
Al-Ghonaim, Mohammed ;
AlYousefi, Nada ;
Tashkandi, Mariam ;
Straus, Sharon E. .
PLOS ONE, 2013, 8 (01)
[4]   The quality of clinical practice guidelines over the last two decades: a systematic review of guideline appraisal studies [J].
Alonso-Coello, Pablo ;
Irfan, Affan ;
Sola, Ivan ;
Gich, Ignasi ;
Delgado-Noguera, Mario ;
Rigau, David ;
Tort, Sera ;
Bonfill, Xavier ;
Burgers, Jako ;
Schunemann, Holger .
QUALITY & SAFETY IN HEALTH CARE, 2010, 19 (06) :e58
[5]   Alzheimer's Disease Dementia Guidelines for Diagnostic Testing: A Systematic Review [J].
Arevalo-Rodriguez, Ingrid ;
Pedraza, Olga L. ;
Rodriguez, Andrea ;
Sanchez, Erick ;
Gich, Ignasi ;
Sola, Ivan ;
Bonfill, Xavier ;
Alonso-Coello, Pablo .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ALZHEIMERS DISEASE AND OTHER DEMENTIAS, 2013, 28 (02) :111-119
[6]   Practitioner Review: Evidence-based practice guidelines on alcohol and drug misuse among adolescents: a systematic review [J].
Bekkering, G. E. ;
Aertgeerts, B. ;
Asueta-Lorente, J. -F. ;
Autrique, M. ;
Goossens, M. ;
Smets, K. ;
van Bussel, J. C. H. ;
Vanderplasschen, W. ;
Van Royen, P. ;
Hannes, K. .
JOURNAL OF CHILD PSYCHOLOGY AND PSYCHIATRY, 2014, 55 (01) :3-21
[7]   Underreporting of conflicts of interest in clinical practice guidelines: cross sectional study [J].
Bindslev, Julie Bolette Brix ;
Schroll, Jeppe ;
Gotzsche, Peter C. ;
Lundh, Andreas .
BMC MEDICAL ETHICS, 2013, 14
[8]   Quality of Guidelines for Cognitive Rehabilitation Following Traumatic Brain Injury [J].
Bragge, Peter ;
Pattuwage, Loyal ;
Marshall, Shawn ;
Pitt, Veronica ;
Piccenna, Loretta ;
Stergiou-Kita, Mary ;
Tate, Robyn L. ;
Teasell, Robert ;
Wiseman-Hakes, Catherine ;
Kua, Ailene ;
Ponsford, Jennie ;
Velikonja, Diana ;
Bayley, Mark .
JOURNAL OF HEAD TRAUMA REHABILITATION, 2014, 29 (04) :277-289
[9]   A Systematic Critical Appraisal of Non-Pharmacological Management of Rheumatoid Arthritis with Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II [J].
Brosseau, Lucie ;
Rahman, Prinon ;
Poitras, Stephane ;
Toupin-April, Karine ;
Paterson, Gail ;
Smith, Christine ;
King, Judy ;
Casimiro, Lynn ;
De Angelis, Gino ;
Loew, Laurianne ;
Cavallo, Sabrina ;
Mc Ewan, Jessica .
PLOS ONE, 2014, 9 (05)
[10]   A Systematic Critical Appraisal for Non-Pharmacological Management of Osteoarthritis Using the Appraisal of Guidelines Research and Evaluation II Instrument [J].
Brosseau, Lucie ;
Rahman, Prinon ;
Toupin-April, Karine ;
Poitras, Stephane ;
King, Judy ;
De Angelis, Gino ;
Loew, Laurianne ;
Casimiro, Lynn ;
Paterson, Gail ;
McEwan, Jessica .
PLOS ONE, 2014, 9 (01)