Evaluation of the EDI enzyme linked immunosorbent assays for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 IgM and IgG antibodies in human plasma

被引:32
作者
Bundschuh, Christian [1 ,2 ]
Egger, Margot [1 ,2 ]
Wiesinger, Kurt [1 ,2 ]
Gabriel, Christian [3 ,4 ]
Clodi, Martin [5 ]
Mueller, Thomas [6 ]
Dieplinger, Benjamin [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Konventhosp Barmherzige Brueder Linz, Dept Lab Med, Seilerstaette 2-4, A-4020 Linz, Austria
[2] Ordensklinikum Linz Barmherzige Schwestern, Seilerstaette 2-4, A-4020 Linz, Austria
[3] Med Univ Graz, Dept Blood Grp Serol & Transfus Med, Graz, Austria
[4] Ludwig Boltzmann Inst Expt & Clin Traumatol Vienn, Vienna, Austria
[5] Konventhosp Barmherzige Brueder Linz, Dept Internal Med, Linz, Austria
[6] Hosp Bolzano, Dept Clin Pathol, Bolzano, Italy
关键词
COVID-19; SARS-CoV-2; ELISA; Antibody testing; Serological test; SOLUBLE ST2;
D O I
10.1016/j.cca.2020.05.047
中图分类号
R446 [实验室诊断]; R-33 [实验医学、医学实验];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Background: Besides SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR testing, serological testing is emerging as additional option in COVID-19 diagnostics. Aim of this study was to evaluate novel immunoassays for detection of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in human plasma. Methods: Using EDI (TM) Novel Coronavirus COVID-19 Enzyme Linked Immunosorbent Assays (ELISAs), we measured SARS-CoV-2 IgM and IgG antibodies in 64 SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR confirmed COVID-19 patients with serial blood samples (n = 104) collected at different time points from symptom onset. Blood samples from 200 healthy blood donors and 256 intensive care unit (ICU) patients collected before the COVID-19 outbreak were also used. Results: The positivity rates in the COVID-19 patients were 5.9% for IgM and 2.9% for IgG <= 5 days after symptom onset; Between day 5 and day 10 the positivity rates were 37.1% for IgM and 37.1% for IgG and rose to 76.4% for IgM and 82.4% for IgG after > 10-15 days. After 15-22 days the "true" positivity rates were 94.4% for IgM and 100% for IgG. The "false" positivity rates were 0.5% for IgM and 1.0% for IgG in the healthy blood donors, 1.6% for IgM and 1.2% for IgG in ICU patients. Conclusions: This study shows high "true" vs. low "false" positivity rates for the EDI (TM) SARS-CoV-2 IgM and IgG ELISAs.
引用
收藏
页码:79 / 82
页数:4
相关论文
共 15 条
[11]   Report from the American Society for Microbiology COVID-19 International Summit, 23 March 2020: Value of Diagnostic Testing for SARS-CoV-2/COVID-19 [J].
Patel, Robin ;
Babady, Esther ;
Theel, Elitza S. ;
Storch, Gregory A. ;
Pinsky, Benjamin A. ;
St George, Kirsten ;
Smith, Tara C. ;
Bertuzzi, Stefano .
MBIO, 2020, 11 (02)
[12]   Interpreting Diagnostic Tests for SARS-CoV-2 [J].
Sethuraman, Nandini ;
Jeremiah, Sundararaj Stanleyraj ;
Ryo, Akihide .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2020, 323 (22) :2249-2251
[13]  
Sun L., 2020, CHINA CDC WEEKLY, V8, P1, DOI DOI 10.46234/ccdcw2020.032
[14]   Virological assessment of hospitalized patients with COVID-2019 [J].
Woelfel, Roman ;
Corman, Victor M. ;
Guggemos, Wolfgang ;
Seilmaier, Michael ;
Zange, Sabine ;
Mueller, Marcel A. ;
Niemeyer, Daniela ;
Jones, Terry C. ;
Vollmar, Patrick ;
Rothe, Camilla ;
Hoelscher, Michael ;
Bleicker, Tobias ;
Bruenink, Sebastian ;
Schneider, Julia ;
Ehmann, Rosina ;
Zwirglmaier, Katrin ;
Drosten, Christian ;
Wendtner, Clemens .
NATURE, 2020, 581 (7809) :465-+
[15]   Comparison of Four Molecular In Vitro Diagnostic Assays for the Detection of SARS-CoV-2 in Nasopharyngeal Specimens [J].
Zhen, Wei ;
Manji, Ryhana ;
Smith, Elizabeth ;
Berry, Gregory J. .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2020, 58 (08)