Ki67 and proliferation in breast cancer

被引:174
|
作者
Pathmanathan, Nirmala [1 ,2 ,5 ]
Balleine, Rosemary L. [3 ,4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Westmead Hosp, Westmead Breast Canc Inst, Westmead, NSW 2145, Australia
[2] Inst Clin Pathol & Med Res, Westmead, NSW, Australia
[3] Western Sydney & Nepean Blue Mt Local Hlth Dist, Dept Translat Oncol, Westmead, NSW, Australia
[4] Westmead Millennium Inst, Westmead Inst Canc Res, Westmead, NSW, Australia
[5] Univ Sydney, Sydney Med Sch Westmead, Westmead, NSW 2145, Australia
关键词
INTERNATIONAL EXPERT CONSENSUS; PROGNOSTIC VALUE; PRIMARY THERAPY; LABELING INDEX; ANTIBODY KI-67; METAANALYSIS; HIGHLIGHTS; RECURRENCE; WOMEN; TAMOXIFEN;
D O I
10.1136/jclinpath-2012-201085
中图分类号
R36 [病理学];
学科分类号
100104 ;
摘要
New approaches to the prognostic assessment of breast cancer have come from molecular profiling studies. A major feature of this work has been to emphasise the importance of cancer cell proliferation as a key discriminative indicator of recurrence risk for oestrogen receptor positive breast cancer in particular. Mitotic count scoring, as a component of histopathological grade, has long formed part of a routine evaluation of breast cancer biology. However, there is an increasingly compelling case to include a specific proliferation score in breast cancer pathology reports based on expression of the cell cycle regulated protein Ki67. Immunohistochemical staining for Ki67 is a widely available and economical test with good tolerance of pre-analytical variations and staining conditions. However, there is currently no evidence based protocol established to derive a reliable and informative Ki67 score for routine clinical use. In this circumstance, pathologists must establish a standardised framework for scoring Ki67 and communicating results to a multidisciplinary team.
引用
收藏
页码:512 / 516
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Prognosis related to Ki67 in early breast cancer.
    Gerson, R.
    Alban, F.
    Villalobos, A.
    Serrano, A.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2010, 28 (15)
  • [32] Ki67 expression in triple negative and luminal A breast cancer
    Sullu, Y.
    Demirag, G. G.
    Ozen, N.
    VIRCHOWS ARCHIV, 2011, 459 : S81 - S82
  • [33] Questions about Ki67 staining in luminal breast cancer
    Kadri Altundag
    Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, 2018, 167 : 599 - 599
  • [34] Questions about Ki67 staining in luminal breast cancer
    Altundag, Kadri
    BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2018, 167 (02) : 599 - 599
  • [35] Value of Ki67 in breast cancer: the debate is still open
    Colozza, Mariantonietta
    Sidoni, Angelo
    Piccart-Gebhart, Martine
    LANCET ONCOLOGY, 2010, 11 (05): : 414 - 415
  • [36] Strategies for developing Ki67 as a useful biomarker in breast cancer
    Denkert, Carsten
    Budczies, Jan
    von Minckwitz, Gunter
    Wienert, Stephan
    Loibl, Sibylle
    Klauschen, Frederick
    BREAST, 2015, 24 : S67 - S72
  • [37] Evaluation of Ki67 as a useful routine marker in breast cancer
    Bhagwat, P.
    Ally, M.
    Moorehead, J.
    VIRCHOWS ARCHIV, 2014, 465 : S108 - S108
  • [38] Proliferation of trophoblasts and Ki67 expression in preeclampsia
    Kaya, Baris
    Nayki, Umit
    Nayki, Cenk
    Ulug, Pasa
    Oner, Gokalp
    Gultekin, Emre
    Yildirim, Yusuf
    ARCHIVES OF GYNECOLOGY AND OBSTETRICS, 2015, 291 (05) : 1041 - 1046
  • [39] Proliferation of trophoblasts and Ki67 expression in preeclampsia
    Barış Kaya
    Umit Nayki
    Cenk Nayki
    Pasa Ulug
    Gokalp Oner
    Emre Gultekin
    Yusuf Yildirim
    Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 2015, 291 : 1041 - 1046
  • [40] A comparative study between Ki67 positive versus Ki67 negative females with breast cancer: Cross sectional study
    Bahaddin, Mowafak Masoud
    ANNALS OF MEDICINE AND SURGERY, 2020, 60 : 232 - 235