A comparative in vitro evaluation of two different magnetic devices detecting the stability of osseo-integrated implants

被引:23
作者
Geckili, O. [1 ]
Bilhan, H. [1 ]
Cilingir, A. [1 ]
Mumcu, E. [1 ]
Bural, C. [1 ]
机构
[1] Istanbul Univ, Fac Dent, Dept Prosthodont, TR-34093 Capa, Turkey
关键词
dental implant; in vitro model; interobserver reliability; intra-observer reliability; resonance frequency analysis; statistics; RESONANCE FREQUENCY-ANALYSIS; DENTAL IMPLANTS; CLINICAL-TRIAL; EXTRACTION; BONE; INTERFACE; MANDIBLES; IMMEDIATE; CAPACITY; VALIDITY;
D O I
10.1111/j.1600-0765.2011.01462.x
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Geckili O, Bilhan H, Cilingir A, Mumcu E, Bural C. A comparative in vitro evaluation of two different magnetic devices detecting the stability of osseo-integrated implants. J Periodont Res 2012; 47: 508513. (c) 2012 John Wiley & Sons A/S Background and Objective: It is unknown whether the resonance frequency analysis (RFA) measurements made by two different magnetic resonance frequency analysers are comparable. This in vitro study was designed to compare the RFA measurements made by the two magnetic resonance frequency analysers and to evaluate the intra- and interobserver reliability of the magnetic devices. Material and Methods: Thirty-two implants were placed in four cow ribs. The RFA value of each implant was measured by five different examiners. The measurements were repeated five times, in both the buccal and mesial directions, for each implant at 2 h intervals, and the averages of registered implant stability quotient (ISQ) units were recorded as the buccal ISQ value and the mesial ISQ value for every implant. Results: No statistically significant differences (p > 0.05) were observed between the RFA measurements made by the two magnetic devices. The intra-observer reliability of both devices was excellent, whereas the interobserver reliability of the devices was poor. Conclusion: The results of the RFA measurements of both tested devices overlap. Although both devices show excellent intra-observer reliability, there are variations between the measurements of different examiners.
引用
收藏
页码:508 / 513
页数:6
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]  
Albrektsson T O, 1994, Periodontol 2000, V4, P58, DOI 10.1111/j.1600-0757.1994.tb00006.x
[2]   Validity and clinical significance of biomechanical testing of implant/bone interface [J].
Aparicio, Carlos ;
Lang, Niklaus R. ;
Rangert, Bo .
CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2006, 17 :2-7
[3]   Immediate restoration of single implants placed immediately after tooth extraction [J].
Barone, Antonio ;
Rispoli, Lorena ;
Vozza, Iole ;
Quaranta, Alessandro ;
Covani, Ugo .
JOURNAL OF PERIODONTOLOGY, 2006, 77 (11) :1914-1920
[4]   Implant stability measurements for implants placed at the time of extraction: A cohort, prospective clinical trial [J].
Becker, W ;
Sennerby, L ;
Bedrossian, E ;
Becker, BE ;
Lucchini, JP .
JOURNAL OF PERIODONTOLOGY, 2005, 76 (03) :391-397
[5]   Influence of surgical technique, implant shape and diameter on the primary stability in cancellous bone [J].
Bilhan, H. ;
Geckili, O. ;
Mumcu, E. ;
Bozdag, E. ;
Sunbuloglu, E. ;
Kutay, O. .
JOURNAL OF ORAL REHABILITATION, 2010, 37 (12) :900-907
[6]  
BRANEMARK PI, 1977, SCAND J PLAST RECONS, P7
[7]   Reliability and validity of the instrumental assessment of implant stability in dry human mandibles [J].
Brouwers, J. E. I. G. ;
Lobbezoo, F. ;
Visscher, C. M. ;
Wismeijer, D. ;
Naeije, M. .
JOURNAL OF ORAL REHABILITATION, 2009, 36 (04) :279-283
[8]   Electronic monitoring of dental implant osseointegration [J].
Dario, LJ ;
Cucchiaro, PJ ;
Deluzio, AJ .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN DENTAL ASSOCIATION, 2002, 133 (04) :483-490
[9]  
Friberg B, 1999, INT J ORAL MAX SURG, V28, P297
[10]  
Friberg B, 1999, INT J ORAL MAX SURG, V28, P266, DOI 10.1016/S0901-5027(99)80156-8