Numerical simulation of soot formation in a turbulent diffusion flame: comparison among three soot formation models

被引:8
作者
Sarlak, R. [1 ]
Shams, M. [1 ]
Ebrahimi, R. [2 ]
机构
[1] KN Toosi Univ Technol, Fac Mech Engn, Tehran, Iran
[2] KN Toosi Univ Technol, Fac Aerosp Engn, Tehran, Iran
关键词
soot formation; turbulent flame; Khan and Greeves model; Tesner model; Lindstedt model; COMBUSTION; PREDICTION; RADIATION;
D O I
10.1177/0954406211421997
中图分类号
TH [机械、仪表工业];
学科分类号
0802 ;
摘要
Combustion and soot formation in a turbulent diffusion flame are simulated. Chemistry of combustion is treated with a detailed reaction mechanism that employs 49 species and 277 reactions. Turbulence is taken into account via the corrected k-epsilon model. Radiation heat transfer from flame is modelled by the P-1 model. An empirical model proposed by Khan and Greeves and two semi-empirical models proposed by Tesner and Lindstedt are used to simulate the soot formation in the flame. Khan and Greeves model showed to underpredict the maximum soot volume fraction. Nevertheless, the main shortcoming of Khan and Greeves model which undermines the applicability of this model to prediction of soot formation in turbulent diffusion flames is the inability to locate the highly sooting regions of the flame properly. Tesner model underpredicts the soot formation significantly, although the predicted shapes of the soot profiles are in accordance with the experimental measurements. Lindstedt model performs well in predicting both the maximum soot formation and the soot profile shapes in the chamber. Therefore, Lindstedt model can be considered as the most suitable model for the prediction of soot formation in turbulent diffusion flames.
引用
收藏
页码:1290 / 1301
页数:12
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]   Kinetic modeling of soot formation with detailed chemistry and physics:: Laminar premixed flames of C2 hydrocarbons [J].
Appel, J ;
Bockhorn, H ;
Frenklach, M .
COMBUSTION AND FLAME, 2000, 121 (1-2) :122-136
[2]   Detailed kinetic modeling of soot aggregate formation in laminar premixed flames [J].
Balthasar, M ;
Frenklach, M .
COMBUSTION AND FLAME, 2005, 140 (1-2) :130-145
[3]   Predictions of soot and thermal radiation properties in confined turbulent jet diffusion flames [J].
Brookes, SJ ;
Moss, JB .
COMBUSTION AND FLAME, 1999, 116 (04) :486-503
[4]  
FLUENT Inc, 2005, FLUENT 6 3 US GUID
[5]   Dynamics of soot formation by turbulent combustion and thermal decomposition of natural gas [J].
Gruenberger, TM ;
Moghiman, M ;
Bowen, PJ ;
Syred, N .
COMBUSTION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2002, 174 (5-6) :67-86
[6]   PREDICTION OF LAMINARIZATION WITH A 2-EQUATION MODEL OF TURBULENCE [J].
JONES, WP ;
LAUNDER, BE .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEAT AND MASS TRANSFER, 1972, 15 (02) :301-+
[7]   SOOT FORMATION BY COMBUSTION OF A FUEL DROPLET IN HIGH-PRESSURE GASEOUS ENVIRONMENTS [J].
KADOTA, T ;
HIROYASU, H ;
FARAZANDEHMEHR, A .
COMBUSTION AND FLAME, 1977, 29 (01) :67-77
[8]  
Khan M., 1974, HEAT TRANSFER FLAMES, P389
[9]  
Kleiveland R. N., 2005, THESIS NORWEGIAN U S
[10]   Modeling soot formation in turbulent methane-air jet diffusion flames [J].
Kronenburg, A ;
Bilger, RW ;
Kent, JH .
COMBUSTION AND FLAME, 2000, 121 (1-2) :24-40