Wound Complications and Perineal Pain After Extralevator Versus Standard Abdominoperineal Excision: A Nationwide Study

被引:18
作者
Colov, Emilie P. [1 ]
Klein, Mads [2 ]
Gogenur, Ismail [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Copenhagen, Rigshosp, Dept Surg C, Copenhagen, Denmark
[2] Univ Copenhagen, Herlev Hosp, Dept Surg D, Copenhagen, Denmark
[3] Univ Copenhagen, Dept Surg, Koge & Roskilde Hosp, Copenhagen, Denmark
关键词
Abdominoperineal; Abdominoperineal excision; Extralevator; Extralevator abdominoperineal excision; Rectal cancer; Wound complications; LOW RECTAL-CANCER; SINGLE-CENTER; RISK-FACTORS; RESECTION; ELAPE; RECONSTRUCTION; PERFORATION; EXPERIENCE; CARCINOMA; CLOSURE;
D O I
10.1097/DCR.0000000000000639
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
BACKGROUND: Extralevator abdominoperineal excision was introduced as an alternative to conventional abdominoperineal excision for low rectal cancers. The perineal dissection is more extensive with extralevator abdominoperineal excision and leaves a greater defect. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate, on a national basis, the risk of perineal wound complications, pain, and hernia after conventional and extralevator abdominoperineal excision performed for low rectal cancer. DESIGN: This was a retrospective study collecting data from the Danish Colorectal Cancer Group database and from electronic medical files of patients. SETTINGS: The study was conducted at Danish surgical departments. PATIENTS: A total of 445 patients operated between 2009 and 2012 with extralevator or conventional abdominoperineal excision were included. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The main end points of this study were perineal wound complications and pain lasting for >30 days after the operation. RESULTS: The 2 groups were demographically similar except for a higher ASA score in the conventional group. In the extralevator group, neoadjuvant chemoradiation was more frequent (71% vs 41%; p < 0.001), T stage was higher (more T3 tumors; 52% vs 38%; p = 0.006), and more tumors were fixed (21% vs 12%; p = 0.02). Perineal wound complications and pain were more frequent after extralevator versus conventional excision (44% vs 25%; p < 0.001 and 38% vs 22%; p < 0.001). After multivariate analyses, neoadjuvant chemoradiation, extralevator excision, and operation early in the study period were found to have a significant influence on the risk of long-term wound complications. Neoadjuvant chemoradiation and wound complications were significant risk factors for long-term perineal pain. Results were similar after subgroup analyses on low tumors only. LIMITATIONS: This was a retrospective study. The 2 groups were not completely comparable at baseline. CONCLUSIONS: Neoadjuvant chemoradiation, extralevator compared with conventional excision, and operation early in the study period were significant factors for predicting perineal wound complications. Neoadjuvant chemoradiation and wound complications were predictors of long-term perineal pain.
引用
收藏
页码:813 / 821
页数:9
相关论文
共 25 条
  • [1] Risk factors for impaired healing of the perineal wound after abdominoperineal resection of rectum for carcinoma
    Artioukh, D. Y.
    Smith, R. A.
    Gokul, K.
    [J]. COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2007, 9 (04) : 362 - 367
  • [2] Outcome of extralevator abdominoperineal excision compared with standard surgery: results from a single centre
    Asplund, D.
    Haglind, E.
    Angenete, E.
    [J]. COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2012, 14 (10) : 1191 - 1196
  • [3] Primary perineal wound closure after preoperative radiotherapy and abdominoperineal resection has a high incidence of wound failure
    Bullard, KM
    Trudel, JL
    Baxter, NN
    Rothenberger, DA
    [J]. DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2005, 48 (03) : 438 - 443
  • [4] Perineal reconstruction after extra-levator abdominoperineal excision (eLAPE): a systematic review
    Butt, Hisham Z.
    Salem, Murtaza K.
    Vijaynagar, Badri
    Chaudhri, Sanjay
    Singh, Baljit
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2013, 28 (11) : 1459 - 1468
  • [5] Perineal Repair After Extralevator Abdominoperineal Excision for Low Rectal Cancer
    Christensen, Henrik Kidmose
    Nerstrom, Peter
    Tei, Troels
    Laurberg, Soren
    [J]. DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2011, 54 (06) : 711 - 717
  • [6] Risk factors for perineal wound complications following abdominoperineal resection
    Christian, CK
    Kwaan, MR
    Betensky, RA
    Breen, EM
    Zinner, MJ
    Bleday, R
    [J]. DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2005, 48 (01) : 43 - 48
  • [7] Wound Complications in Rectal Cancer Patients Undergoing Primary Closure of the Perineal Wound After Abdominoperineal Resection
    El-Gazzaz, Galal
    Kiran, Ravi Pokala
    Lavery, Ian
    [J]. DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2009, 52 (12) : 1962 - 1966
  • [8] Reconstruction of the perineum following extralevator abdominoperineal excision for carcinoma of the lower rectum: a systematic review
    Foster, J. D.
    Pathak, S.
    Smart, N. J.
    Branagan, G.
    Longman, R. J.
    Thomas, M. G.
    Francis, N.
    [J]. COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2012, 14 (09) : 1052 - 1059
  • [9] Randomized clinical trial of conventional versus cylindrical abdominoperineal resection for locally advanced lower rectal cancer
    Han, Jia Gang
    Wang, Zhen Jun
    Wei, Guang Hui
    Gao, Zhi Gang
    Yang, Yong
    Zhao, Bao Cheng
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2012, 204 (03) : 274 - 282
  • [10] Harling Henrik, 2005, Ugeskr Laeger, V167, P4187