Efficacy of cyclosporine 0.05% ophthalmic emulsion in contact lens wearers with dry eyes

被引:27
作者
Willen, Christi M. [1 ]
McGwin, Gerald [1 ,2 ]
Liu, Bin [1 ]
Owsley, Cynthia [1 ]
Rosenstiel, Carol [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Alabama, Dept Ophthalmol, Sch Med, Birmingham, AL 35294 USA
[2] Univ Alabama, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Epidemiol & Int Hlth, Birmingham, AL 35294 USA
来源
EYE & CONTACT LENS-SCIENCE AND CLINICAL PRACTICE | 2008年 / 34卷 / 01期
关键词
contact lens; cyclosporine ophthalmic emulsion; dry eye;
D O I
10.1097/ICL.0b013e3180676d44
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Purpose. To assess the efficacy of cyclosporine 0.05% ophthalmic emulsion (Restasis Allergan, Inc., Irvine, CA) in the treatment of contact lens wearers with dry eyes. Methods. Contact lens wearers citing dry eye problems were identified through chart review. Participants were randomly assigned to a treatment group, receiving vials of cyclosporine 0.05% ophthalmic emulsion to use twice daily, or a placebo group, receiving vials of rewetting drops (Refresh Preservative Free Artificial Tears; Allergan, Inc.) to use twice daily. Corneal staining, tear film breakup time, and Schirmer test results were documented at baseline and after 3 months. Participants also completed questionnaires, the Ocular Surface Disease Index, and the National Eye Institute Refractive Error Quality of Life Instrument at baseline and after 3 months. Results. For all parameters, including objective findings and subjective reporting of symptoms, there was no statistically significant difference between the treatment and placebo groups, Conclusions. This study did not detect a beneficial effect in using cyclosporine 0.05% ophthalmic emulsion over rewetting drops for contact lens wearers. This may be attributable to the small sample size. It is also possible that the mechanism of the dry eye state in contact lens wearers may be different from that of other dry eye states and thus make cyclosporine 0.05% ophthalmic emulsion an ineffective treatment.
引用
收藏
页码:43 / 45
页数:3
相关论文
共 15 条
  • [1] Cakmak Sevin Soker, 2003, Eye Contact Lens, V29, P230
  • [2] Chalmers Robin L, 2006, Cont Lens Anterior Eye, V29, P25, DOI 10.1016/j.clae.2005.12.004
  • [3] Foulks Gary N, 2003, Eye Contact Lens, V29, pS96
  • [4] Psychometric properties of the National Eye Institute-Refractive Error Quality of Life instrument
    Hays, RD
    Mangione, CM
    Ellwein, L
    Lindblad, AS
    Spritzer, KL
    McDonnell, PJ
    [J]. OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2003, 110 (12) : 2292 - 2301
  • [5] Hom Milton M, 2006, Eye Contact Lens, V32, P109, DOI 10.1097/01.icl.0000175651.30487.58
  • [6] Lemp Michael A., 1995, CLAO Journal, V21, P221
  • [7] Evaporation from the ocular surface
    Mathers, W
    [J]. EXPERIMENTAL EYE RESEARCH, 2004, 78 (03) : 389 - 394
  • [8] Responsiveness of the National Eye Institute Refractive Error Quality of Life instrument to surgical correction of refractive error
    McDonnell, PJ
    Mangione, C
    Lee, P
    Lindblad, AS
    Spritzer, KL
    Berry, S
    Hays, RD
    [J]. OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2003, 110 (12) : 2302 - 2309
  • [9] Sensitivity of the National Eye Institute Refractive Error Quality of Life instrument to refractive surgery outcomes
    Nichols, JJ
    Twa, MD
    Mitchell, GL
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2005, 31 (12) : 2313 - 2318
  • [10] Reliability and validity of refractive error-specific quality-of-life instruments
    Nichols, JJ
    Mitchell, GL
    Saracino, M
    Zadnik, K
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2003, 121 (09) : 1289 - 1296