Protecting Democracy from Disinformation: Normative Threats and Policy Responses

被引:55
作者
Tenove, Chris [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ British Columbia, Dept Polit Sci, C425-1866 Main Mall, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z1, Canada
关键词
online disinformation; democracy; election campaign; media law; Internet; policy making;
D O I
10.1177/1940161220918740
中图分类号
G2 [信息与知识传播];
学科分类号
05 ; 0503 ;
摘要
Following public revelations of interference in the United States 2016 election, there has been widespread concern that online disinformation poses a serious threat to democracy. Governments have responded with a wide range of policies. However, there is little clarity in elite policy debates or academic literature about what it actually means for disinformation to endanger democracy, and how different policies might protect it. This article proposes that policies to address disinformation seek to defend three important normative goods of democratic systems: self-determination, accountable representation, and public deliberation. Policy responses to protect these goods tend to fall in three corresponding governance sectors: self-determination is the focus of international and national security policies; accountable representation is addressed through electoral regulation; and threats to the quality of public debate and deliberation are countered by media regulation. The article also reveals some of the challenges and risks in these policy sectors, which can be seen in both innovative and failed policy designs.
引用
收藏
页码:517 / 537
页数:21
相关论文
共 75 条
  • [1] Trends in the diffusion of misinformation on social media
    Allcott, Hunt
    Gentzkow, Matthew
    Yu, Chuan
    [J]. RESEARCH & POLITICS, 2019, 6 (02)
  • [2] Social Media and Fake News in the 2016 Election
    Allcott, Hunt
    Gentzkow, Matthew
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC PERSPECTIVES, 2017, 31 (02) : 211 - 235
  • [3] [Anonymous], 1996, FACTS NORMS CONTRIBU
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2017, Freedom on the Net 2017: Manipulating Social Media to Undermine Democracy
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2018, LAWFARE
  • [6] [Anonymous], 2017, AUDIENCE PERSPECTIVE
  • [7] Aspinwall N, 2020, FOREIGN POLICY
  • [8] Australian Competition and Consumer Commission, 2019, Digital Platforms Inquiry: Final Report
  • [9] Benkler Yochai Robert, 2018, NETWORK PROPAGANDA M, DOI [DOI 10.1093/OSO/9780190923624.001.0001, DOI 10.1093/OSO/9780190923624.003.0010]
  • [10] Hallin and Mancini Revisited: Four Empirical Types of Western Media Systems
    Brueggemann, Michael
    Engesser, Sven
    Buechel, Florin
    Humprecht, Edda
    Castro, Laia
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COMMUNICATION, 2014, 64 (06) : 1037 - 1065