Review of optimal techniques for robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy

被引:3
作者
Kasabwala, Khushabu [1 ]
Patel, Neal A. [1 ]
Hu, Jim C. [1 ]
机构
[1] Weill Cornell Med Coll, New York Presbyterian Hosp, Dept Urol, 525 East 68th St,9th Floor Starr Pavil,Room 900, New York, NY 10065 USA
关键词
prostate cancer; robotic prostotectorny; surgical techniques; LYMPH-NODE DISSECTION; VATTIKUTI-INSTITUTE PROSTATECTOMY; BLADDER NECK PRESERVATION; POSITIVE SURGICAL MARGINS; LAPAROSCOPIC PROSTATECTOMY; URINARY CONTINENCE; LEARNING-CURVE; PELVIC LYMPHADENECTOMY; FUNCTIONAL OUTCOMES; URETHRAL LENGTH;
D O I
10.1097/MOU.0000000000000473
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose of review Robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy has been rapidly adopted and is now the standard of care in the surgical management of prostate cancer. Since the initial description in 2001, the technique has evolved to optimize oncological functional outcomes. Herein, we review key techniques for the robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy. Recent findings With the current influx of new technology such as focal therapy, stereotactic body radiation therapy and prostate-sparing treatments, there is greater emphasis on maximizing outcomes of robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy. The evidence-based techniques of optimizing oncological outcomes including the lymph node dissection and improving cancer control through minimizing positive surgical margins are reviewed. Improvements in functional recovery has also been seen with technical modifications such as nerve sparing, preservation of the urethral support structures and the bladder neck and the urethra-vesical reconstruction. Summary Robotic prostatectomy has demonstrated adequate long-term oncologic success and satisfactory functional recovery. As technology and techniques in robotic-assisted surgery evolve, surgeons will continue to optimize techniques to maximize functional outcome recovery and cancer control. Further studies are actively being conducted to provide level one evidence in multiple aspects of the robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy.
引用
收藏
页码:102 / 107
页数:6
相关论文
共 63 条
[1]  
American Urological Association, 2017, CLIN LOC PROST CANC
[2]   Positive surgical margins in robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy: Impact of learning curve on oncologic outcomes [J].
Atug, F ;
Castle, EP ;
Srivastav, SK ;
Burgess, SV ;
Thomas, R ;
Davis, R .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2006, 49 (05) :866-872
[3]   Is a limited lymph node dissection an adequate staging procedure for prostate cancer? [J].
Bader, P ;
Burkhard, FC ;
Markwalder, R ;
Studer, UE .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2002, 168 (02) :514-518
[4]   Assessing the Impact of Barbed Suture on Vesicourethral Anastomosis During Minimally Invasive Radical Prostatectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis [J].
Bai, Yunjin ;
Pu, Chunxiao ;
Yuan, Haichao ;
Tang, Yin ;
Wang, Xiaoming ;
Li, Jinhong ;
Wei, Qiang ;
Han, Ping .
UROLOGY, 2015, 85 (06) :1368-1375
[5]   Long-term outcome after radical prostatectomy for patients with lymph node positive prostate cancer in the prostate specific antigen era [J].
Boorjian, Stephen A. ;
Thompson, R. Houston ;
Siddiqui, Sameer ;
Bagniewski, Stephanie ;
Bergstralh, Erik J. ;
Karnes, R. Jeffrey ;
Frank, Igor ;
Blute, Michael L. .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2007, 178 (03) :864-870
[6]   Critical assessment of ideal nodal yield at pelvic lymphadenectomy to accurately diagnose prostate cancer nodal metastasis in patients undergoing radical retropubic prostatectomy [J].
Briganti, Alberto ;
Chun, Felix K. -H. ;
Salonia, Andrea ;
Gallina, Andrea ;
Zanni, Giuseppe ;
Scattoni, Vincenzo ;
Valiquette, Luc ;
Rigatti, Patrizio ;
Montorsi, Francesco ;
Karakiewicz, Pierre I. .
UROLOGY, 2007, 69 (01) :147-151
[7]   Anatomic and technical considerations for optimizing recovery of sexual function during robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy [J].
Carter, Stacey ;
Le, Jesse D. ;
Hu, Jim C. .
CURRENT OPINION IN UROLOGY, 2013, 23 (01) :88-94
[8]   Influence of Modified Posterior Reconstruction of the Rhabdosphincter on Early Recovery of Continence and Anastomotic Leakage Rates after Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy [J].
Coelho, Rafael F. ;
Chauhan, Sanket ;
Orvieto, Marcelo A. ;
Sivaraman, Ananthakrishnan ;
Palmer, Kenneth J. ;
Coughlin, Geoff ;
Patel, Vipul R. .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2011, 59 (01) :72-80
[9]   Adequacy of lymphadenectomy among men undergoing robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy [J].
Cooperberg, Matthew R. ;
Kane, Christopher J. ;
Cowan, Janet E. ;
Carroll, Peter R. .
BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2010, 105 (01) :88-92
[10]   Patient-Reported Outcomes after Monitoring, Surgery, or Radiotherapy for Prostate Cancer [J].
Donovan, J. L. ;
Hamdy, F. C. ;
Lane, J. A. ;
Mason, M. ;
Metcalfe, C. ;
Walsh, E. ;
Blazeby, J. M. ;
Peters, T. J. ;
Holding, P. ;
Bonnington, S. ;
Lennon, T. ;
Bradshaw, L. ;
Cooper, D. ;
Herbert, P. ;
Howson, J. ;
Jones, A. ;
Lyons, N. ;
Salter, E. ;
Thompson, P. ;
Tidball, S. ;
Blaikie, J. ;
Gray, C. ;
Bollina, P. ;
Catto, J. ;
Doble, A. ;
Doherty, A. ;
Gillatt, D. ;
Kockelbergh, R. ;
Kynaston, H. ;
Paul, A. ;
Powell, P. ;
Prescott, S. ;
Rosario, D. J. ;
Rowe, E. ;
Davis, M. ;
Turner, E. L. ;
Martin, R. M. ;
Neal, D. E. .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2016, 375 (15) :1425-1437