Intrauterine contraception: impact of provider training on participant knowledge and provision

被引:25
作者
Lewis, Carrie [1 ]
Darney, Philip [1 ]
Thiel de Bocanegra, Heike [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif San Francisco, Bixby Ctr Global Reprod Hlth, Dept Obstet Gynecol & Reprod Sci, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
关键词
Family PACT; Medicaid; Medi-Cal; Long-acting reversible contraception (LARC); Program evaluation;
D O I
10.1016/j.contraception.2013.06.004
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Background: In California's Medicaid family planning expansion, the Family Planning, Access, Care and Treatment (Family PACT) Program, only 1.9% of contracepting women received intrauterine contraception (IUC) in 2006. Ten skills-based IUC provider trainings were offered from 2007 to 2010. Objective: The objective was to evaluate the impact of these trainings on participant knowledge of the broad range of appropriate IUC candidates and measure changes in IUC provision following training. Study Design: We evaluated changes in provider knowledge using a nine-item IUC Candidate Selection Scale on pre- and posttraining surveys. Changes in provision of IUC following the training were measured using Family PACT claims data. We compared changes in insertions posttraining to pretraining levels as well as to matched comparison sites that did not send trainees. Results: Most participants at the training were advanced practice clinicians (70%) specializing in general primary care (77%) and practicing at community clinics (45%). Training participants increased their understanding of appropriate candidates (mean change in raw summary score=8.6, p<.001), from an average of 58% correct responses to 81%. Provider sites that participated in training provided a mean of 4.6 more women with IUC following training than during baseline (p<.01), an increase of 25% compared to only 7% increase among comparison sites. The impact of the training differed by practice size such that the largest and smallest clinics both changed IUC provision the most and had the largest differences over comparison sites. Conclusions: This study shows that skills-based training is an important strategy for the increase of IUC provision. (c) 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:226 / 231
页数:6
相关论文
共 16 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], NATL HLTH STAT REPOR
  • [2] Bixby Center for Global Reproductive Health. University of California San Francisco, 2012, FAM PACT PROGR REP F
  • [3] Enhancing Service Delivery Through Title X Funding: Findings from California
    de Bocanegra, Heike Thiel
    Maguire, Fran
    Hulett, Denis
    Horsley, Kathryn
    Puffer, Maryjane
    Brindis, Claire D.
    [J]. PERSPECTIVES ON SEXUAL AND REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH, 2012, 44 (04) : 262 - 269
  • [4] Cost Savings From the Provision of Specific Methods of Contraception in a Publicly Funded Program
    Foster, Diana Greene
    Rostovtseva, Dana P.
    Brindis, Claire D.
    Biggs, M. Antonia
    Hulett, Denis
    Darney, Philip D.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2009, 99 (03) : 446 - 451
  • [5] Mazurek Gerald H., 2010, Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, V59, P1
  • [6] Challenges in translating evidence to practice - The provision of intrauterine contraception
    Harper, Cynthia C.
    Blum, Maya
    de Bocanegra, Heike Thiel
    Darney, Philip D.
    Speidel, J. Joseph
    Policar, Michael
    Drey, Eleanor A.
    [J]. OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2008, 111 (06) : 1359 - 1369
  • [7] Intrauterine contraception: evaluation of clinician practice patterns in Kaiser Permanente Northern California
    Postlethwaite, Debbie
    Shaber, Ruth
    Mancuso, Victoria
    Flores, Jean
    Armstrong, Mary Anne
    [J]. CONTRACEPTION, 2007, 75 (03) : 177 - 184
  • [8] Pourat N., 2011, Californians newly eligible for medi-cal under health care reform
  • [9] SAS Institute Inc, SAS VERS 9 2
  • [10] The Contraceptive CHOICE Project: reducing barriers to long-acting reversible contraception
    Secura, Gina M.
    Allsworth, Jenifer E.
    Madden, Tessa
    Mullersman, Jennifer L.
    Peipert, Jeffrey F.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2010, 203 (02) : 115.e1 - 115.e7